# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates minimal understanding with multiple inaccuracies. Laws and policies are missing or irrelevant to the chosen setting.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows limited understanding of policies with some inaccuracies. Few relevant laws included, with minimal or unclear explanations.

# data[].attributes.body
Presents basic understanding of policies with some accurate information. Includes a few relevant laws but may lack detail in explanations or implementation specifics.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows good understanding of policies with mostly accurate information. Includes several relevant laws and policies with adequate explanations of their application in the chosen setting.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of cigarette/alcohol policies with detailed, accurate information specific to chosen setting (family/school/community). Includes multiple relevant laws and policies with clear explanations of their implementation and impact.

# data[].attributes.body
Minimal effort in design with few or no graphics. Information is chaotic and hard to read. Visual elements are missing or inappropriate.

# data[].attributes.body
Poor design choices with limited use of graphics. Information is disorganized and difficult to follow. Visual elements may distract from content.

# data[].attributes.body
Adequately designed poster with basic use of graphics and colors. Information is somewhat organized but may have minor issues with readability or flow.

# data[].attributes.body
Well-designed poster with appropriate use of graphics and colors. Information is organized clearly with good readability and visual flow.

# data[].attributes.body
Exceptionally well-designed poster with creative use of graphics, colors, and layout. Information is logically organized with clear hierarchy and excellent readability. All elements enhance understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Little to no evidence of group collaboration. Collaboration features barely used or not used at all.

# data[].attributes.body
Uneven participation among group members. Limited use of collaboration features with minimal interactions.

# data[].attributes.body
Some group members contributed more than others. Basic use of collaboration features with occasional interactions.

# data[].attributes.body
Most group members contributed actively with evidence of good participation. Good use of collaboration features with regular interactions.

# data[].attributes.body
All group members actively contributed to the project with clear evidence of equal participation. Excellent use of Padlet's collaboration features with frequent interactions and updates.

# data[].attributes.body
No meaningful analysis of policy impact. No suggestions for improvement provided.

# data[].attributes.body
Minimal analysis of policy impact. Suggestions for improvement are superficial or missing.

# data[].attributes.body
Basic understanding of policy impact with limited analysis. Some attempt at suggesting improvements but may lack depth.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows good understanding of policy impact with some analysis of effectiveness. Includes relevant suggestions for improvement.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates deep understanding of how policies affect the target setting. Includes thoughtful analysis of policy effectiveness and suggests meaningful improvements or implications.