# data[].attributes.body
In your last assignment, you observed shortcomings in the lesson created by the AI.

Then, in class, you tried to improve the lesson based on what was missing.

Now, let's see how ChatGPT would do with a better prompt, compared to you.

1. Try and write a better prompt, including the weak points you found.

2. Compare your proposal and the AI’s. Comments?

3. Record a video (2 minutes) where you compare your proposal and the AI’s.

Work in groups, everyone must talk a bit. Also upload:

The prompt you prepared

Your lesson

The new AI's lesson

# data[].attributes.body
Sara Guercilena, 1082930

Marina Romedi, 1089984

Marta Radaelli, 1090614

Giulia Briotti, 1075806

Martina Serughetti, 1089979

Amedea Dehó, 1025870

# data[].attributes.body
Key Differences:

ChatGPT's lesson is more complex and generally more interactive.

Our lesson incorporates the students' L1 (first language) and a video.

ChatGPT proposes an experiment and a dramatization-based game.

Our game features an information gap activity ("To be or not to be").

The cultural aspect has a different focus.

# data[].attributes.body
Francesca Baitelli

Valentina Grigia

Sabrina Longoni

# data[].attributes.headline
COMPARISON BETWEEN OUR PROPOSAL AND THE AI’S LESSON 

# data[].attributes.subject
COMPARISON BETWEEN OUR PROPOSAL AND THE AI’S LESSON 

# data[].attributes.body
Sabrina Peli 1075877

Claudia Taiocchi 1023325

Emanuela Civillini 1025659

# data[].attributes.body
Erika Michetti 39974

Alessia Maccarini 1079135

Matteo Pirola 1090086

Mariachiara Giaccardi 1089406

# data[].attributes.body
Orsi Alessandra 1084771

Bana Leonardo 1074414

Assolari Sabrina 1089103

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
the water cycle - Curti, Gandola, Guarienti, Marchina

# data[].attributes.body
Federica Marino 1090049

Gaia Vimercati 1084743

Sofia Novelli 1084761

Gaia Frassoni 1084722