# data[].attributes.body
I don't believe in UFO's in general, but when it comes down to those two videos the only difference really was that one guy was formal and the other was not.

The Navy guy in the interview on 60 minutes was prepared to talk about that subject, he chose to wear professional atire, he had confidence in his voice but at least from that clip failed to provide any evidence and went completely off speculation.

The UFO guy however was inside a store, he gave us examples of when he faced sightings and was brave enough to tell us he could've been tripping balls.

# data[].attributes.body
I am most likely to trust the first videos because one, it looked more like a professional interview. Two, there were 2 people, which shows proof that more than 1 person could have seen the same thing. They both described it in the same way and seeing it together. Also as the lady said, I wouldn't have come forward if I had seen it alone because of how crazy it sounds. In the second video, the guy seemed like he couldn't get his facts straight and when he was talking he said, I don't know I'm always hallucinating, so that seemed like I couldn't trust what he says or sees.

# data[].attributes.body
The video I am most likely to trust would have to be the first video because the guy being interviewed spoke clearly unlike the guy in the second video where he kept jumbling his words. Another reason I would believe the guy in the first video is because of his body language and eye contact. He looked at the guy in the eye and sat tall. The guy in the second video kept looking away.

# data[].attributes.body
After watching both videos, I am more likely to trust the first video. Its in a studio with people are more serious than the second video, where the guy seemed to have a joking sense. The setting of the first video is more professional.

# data[].attributes.body
I am more likely to trust the first video because they were more professionals and seems to know what they were talking about. However, the second video the UFO guy seems like he wasn’t sure on certain things. He kept moving, questioning himself, second guessing him and most importantly didn’t have factual prove of what he was talking about.

# data[].attributes.body
I would trust the first video over the second because the first video's facts were presented much more professionally, as well as double-checked by a second person.

# data[].attributes.body
I would pick the first one because it’s more formal and the second guy literally admitted that he often hallucinates on planes.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel the 60 Minutes interview is more solid proof that UFO's exist because not only are there multiple eye witness accounts there was also video proof of what they saw. Even the guy that was being interviewed admitted he didn't believe in UFO's but what he saw was definitely not of this world. The guy in the store was funny but wasn't very credible. He just kinda rambled and said that they do exist and him and his buddies were gonna go to Area 51.

# data[].attributes.headline
I would trust the people in the first video…

# data[].attributes.subject
I would trust the people in the first video…

# data[].attributes.body
because the set up seems to be more professional. The questions being asked are in a more formal setting and the lighting makes it seem like an interview. I would not trust the second person because he was rambling and talking about how he hallucinates sometimes. The lighting and the way the interviewer is asking the questions in the second video is very unorganized and doesn’t seem very convincing the way he says he’s seen ufos.

# data[].attributes.body
I would believe the navy pilots saying that UFOS exist because they seemed very serious about what they saw and spoke in a sincere manner. They were also more trustworthy because the man stated he was “not a UFO guy” meaning he never believed in them until he encountered one himself with a group of others who claim to have seen the same thing.

# data[].attributes.body
Definitely the first video. They seemed educated and level headed. What they described seemed a little crazy, but they knew they sounded a bit crazy;Unlike the UFO guy. They also had other people that were in the plane with them, who also saw the same thing. They weren’t just making it up for attention.

# data[].attributes.headline
I would believe the first video more due to it being a more professional setting, the way they spoke, and the videos used. I would also believe it more because they say multiple people saw it and not just one person believing in ufo's.

# data[].attributes.subject
I would believe the first video more due to it being a more professional setting, the way they spoke, and the videos used. I would also believe it more because they say multiple people saw it and not just one person believing in ufo's.

# data[].attributes.body
I trust the Navy pilot because not only did he have multiple witnesses present to see the UFO, he also had footage of it. In addition, he does not jump to conclusions about what it might be and only tells reporters what he observed.

# data[].attributes.body
I would trust the pilots because they have experience being in the air, they have knowledge of other aircrafts and know what they are like and how they run, and they had multiple witness and evidence on what they saw. Also the interview itself was more professional then the UFO Guy.

# data[].attributes.body
I would trust the 1st video because the setting seemed more trustworthy and was backed up by more than one person therefore they could vouch for one another.

# data[].attributes.body
The 60 minute video since the man claimed he was in the air right next to it, other witnesses were there and they tried to get it on camera. In comparison the other guy said he was always hallucinating. I still wouldn't believe either of them though.

# data[].attributes.body
I would trust the first video because the interview setting seemed more professional, the interviewee was a credible source, and his language was not casual

# data[].attributes.body
the first video the people seem to be more serious and it two people instead of one and they are more structured with their story

# data[].attributes.body
i would trust the first person because one he’s more serious about it and he just looks more professional. he gave sort of videographic proof that he saw something disappear then reappear. he also had eye witnesses. the other guy looked more like he just liked the idea of them being out there.

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the "+" sign in bottom right corner, type your response in the box that appears, and then click "Publish."