# data[].attributes.body
Sharing Good Practice via KCEP+ - need to highlight these case studies etc. Just have to work out the best way to do this

# data[].attributes.body
Need mechanisms to share good practice - what are they?

# data[].attributes.body
Invite Planning to come and talk to us at the next LTEC all meeting - present and offer a workshop so we can really start to shape this?

# data[].attributes.body
What support can Planning give us now - as we move into supporting L2 programmes on KCEP. The collection of data - what we are collecting, what for and why - needs to be clear before having the conversation with Planning

# data[].attributes.body
What support is available for us via Planning - they should be able to take on some of the data analysis etc. We need to be clear what we need from Planning if we went down this route.

# data[].attributes.body
Would be useful to have a resource (a person) around evaluation and research to enable this work to happen in LTEC.

# data[].attributes.body
Impact on staff and courses = one form of evaluation
Impact of KCEP+ PROCESS = another evaluation
Important to separate the two

# data[].attributes.body
Use students as part of the evaluation strategy - enables co-creation. What impact did it have on them and what changes they suggest going forward.

# data[].attributes.body
Need to develop our own mechanisms for evaluation - what are we looking for here and let's develop an evaluation strategy that works for us

# data[].attributes.body
Impact is a long term thing.
Engagement is quick/easy to measure - in terms of bums on seats but that doesn't measure impact

# data[].attributes.body
Focus groups would help - on a longitudinal basis, over 3 years. Will show impact and change to the student experience - but needs to be built in at the start of the project. The time limitations need to be acknowledged

# data[].attributes.body
Tamara sets actions for colleagues/course teams and then goes and checks in with them again 3 months later.

THIS ALSO TAKES TIME - WE DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCE!

# data[].attributes.body
Tamara following up with staff 3 months later to find out what changes etc. they have made. Tamara takes a semi structured interview approach with colleagues - to allow for that individualisation rather than having them just "fill the form in".

# data[].attributes.body
Individualised evaluation per project is most useful - we don't always want the same outcomes, therefore the evaluation needs to be tailored to the specific instance.

# data[].attributes.body
We need to gather data that is going to be relevant to our purposes. Currently a homogenous one size fits all evaluation form that covers all of our offer is not fit for purpose. We need to have a rethink of this ASAP.

# data[].attributes.body
Remember that the outcomes of the evaluation has the potential to be written up a research paper(s) - this has many benefits, for us as individuals and for the wider university

# data[].attributes.body
Talk to Planning about treating this as a piece of institutional research - what support they can offer for the evaluation?

# data[].attributes.body
Have an independent evaluator - someone not involved in the specific initiatives. Set up regular "check in" times for evaluation? Approach as a research project

# data[].attributes.body
Staff involved in KCEP need to appreciate that transformational change doesn't happen overnight - often this is an iterative process - this must be acknowledged across the whole piece

# data[].attributes.body
Case studies at Festival of Learning etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Need time to do evaluation properly - a generic happy sheet after the event is not sufficient!