# data[].attributes.headline
Issue 5 - Incidents with other students or in other schools

# data[].attributes.subject
Issue 5 - Incidents with other students or in other schools

# data[].attributes.headline
Issue 4 - Sexual relationship with this student after she turned 18.

# data[].attributes.subject
Issue 4 - Sexual relationship with this student after she turned 18.

# data[].attributes.headline
Issue 3 - Sexualised conversation with a student (17) at Ontario school

# data[].attributes.subject
Issue 3 - Sexualised conversation with a student (17) at Ontario school

# data[].attributes.headline
Issue 2 - Failure to notify the school of suspension of teaching license

# data[].attributes.subject
Issue 2 - Failure to notify the school of suspension of teaching license

# data[].attributes.headline
Issue 1 - Failure to disclose previous child protection concerns/investigation/sanctions

# data[].attributes.subject
Issue 1 - Failure to disclose previous child protection concerns/investigation/sanctions

# data[].attributes.body
Topic - Previously undisclosed safeguarding concerns

# data[].attributes.headline
Issue 4 - Touching other parts of the body

# data[].attributes.subject
Issue 4 - Touching other parts of the body

# data[].attributes.body
Topic - Inappropriate Touch

# data[].attributes.body
1. Questions need to be framed in age/ability appropriate language

2. The name of the accused person needs to be mentioned in some but not all questions to ensure there is no confusion about who the child is saying has been inappropriate.

3. Avoid leading questions  - e.g. “Did he put his tongue in your mouth?”

4. The interview strategy should not be a comprehensive list of questions that interviewers adhere to rigidly.

There needs to be room for flexibility and responding to what is presented.