# data[].attributes.body
Discussion method can develop following abilities
among students
• Thinking and communicating powers
• Leadership quality
• Expression ability
• Problem solving ability
• Creativity
• Motivation and confidence
In short higher level cognitive and affective
objectives can be realized through discussion
method.

Disadvantages of Discussion Method

There is a chance that only a few students may dominate
the whole discussion.
• It is possible that discussion is initiated on those aspects of
the problem with which few prominent students of the class
are concerned.
• It is time consuming.
• Not adaptable to all teaching-learning situations.
• If it is not properly guided, a discussion can degenerate into
a consideration of inappropriate topics adding confusion
rather than clarification to the lesson.

# data[].attributes.headline
Panel discussion method4-8 qualified person discuss a given topic

# data[].attributes.subject
Panel discussion method4-8 qualified person discuss a given topic

# data[].attributes.body
Discussion method includes
1. Small group discussion technique
2. Socialized classroom discussion technique
3. Panel discussion technique

# data[].attributes.body
Discussion
The word 'discuss' has been derived from the Latin root 'discutere', which means to shake or strike. Thus 'discussion' refers to thoroughly shaking up the subject, that is, examining it thoroughly to reach a conclusion.
• A discussion is an activity of sitting and talking about a specific subject.

Discussion method
A discussion method is the means by which people share experiences, ideas and attitudes.
• Discussion method enable to engage in an orderly verbal interchange and to express thoughts on a particular subject.

Discussion method cont
Discussion involves two-way communication between participants.
• In the classroom situation a teacher and students all participate in discussion.
• During discussion, the teacher spends some time listening while the students spend sometimes talking.
• The discussion is, therefore, a more active learning experience for the students than the lecture.

# data[].attributes.body
a conference for discussion or deliberation by several participants
Also used to describe a discussion or meetingwhere everyone is thought of as equal in importance:

The round table discussion will be with business executives.

# data[].attributes.body
Technique roundtable consist of four until five students; and teacher give a picture about something and students discribe in paper with share the ideas every student. This a technique can to give the effect in learning English especially in writing descriptive text for learner.
Roundtable is a good cooperative structure and interactive activity to practice vocabulary, grammar, or even content. Students pass a paper around, adding an item according to the criteria you designate. It is similar to Roundrobin, which is an oral chain activity. In Roundtable, each student says a response, writes it on the page, and passes it on. You may want to brainstorm possible substitutions first.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer review is the independent assessment of your research paper by experts in your field.
Its purpose is to evaluate the manuscript’s quality and suitability for publication.

As well as being a form of quality control for academic journals, peer review is also a very useful source of feedback, helping you to improve your paper before it is published. At its best, review is a collaborative process, where authors engage in a dialogue with their peers and receive constructive support to advance their work.
Some of practical reasons why peer review is beneficial to you. Review can alert you to any errors in your work or gaps in the literature you may have overlooked. Researchers consistently tell us that their final published article is better than the version they submitted before peer review.
There are four main types of peer review used:

Single-blind: the reviewers know the names of the authors, but the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript unless the reviewer chooses to sign their report.

Double-blind: the reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript.

Open peer: authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article and the authors’ response to the reviewer.

Transparent peer: the reviewers know the names of the authors, but the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript unless the reviewer chooses to sign their report. If the manuscript is accepted, the anonymous reviewer reports are published alongside the article and the authors’ response to the reviewer.

# data[].attributes.body
Discussion methods are a variety of forums for open-ended, collaborative exchange of ideas among a teacher and students or among students for the purpose of furthering students thinking, learning, problem solving, understanding, or literary appreciation. Participants present multiple points of view, respond to the ideas of others, and reflect on their own ideas in an effort to build their knowledge, understanding, or interpretation of the matter at hand.

Discussions may occur among members of a dyad, small group, or whole class and be teacher-led or student-led. They frequently involve discussion of a written text, though discussion can also focus on a problem, issue, or topic that has its basis in a “text” in the larger sense of the term (e.g., a discipline, the media, a societal norm). Other terms for discussions used for pedagogical purposes are instructional conversations (Tharp & Gallimore, 1988) and substantive conversations (Newmann, 1990).

A defining feature of discussion is that students have considerable agency in the construction of knowledge, understanding, or interpretation. In other words, they have considerable “interpretive authority” for evaluating the plausibility or validity of participants responses.

# data[].attributes.body
A case study is a detailed study of a specific subject, such as a person, group, place, event, organization, or phenomenon.

Main Goal: To gain concrete, contextual, in-depth knowledge about a specific real-world subject.

Types: Collective (studying a group), Descriptive (a descriptive theory), Explanatory (focus on reasons), Exploratory (a prelude to more in-depth research), Instrumental (more than obvious understanding), Intrinsic (a personal interest in the case).

How to make a case-study:
Step 1: Select a case
Step 2: Build a theoretical framework
Step 3: Collect your data
Step 4: Describe and analyze the case

# data[].attributes.headline
PPT by Iskakova Zhansaya and Kurbanova Madina

# data[].attributes.subject
PPT by Iskakova Zhansaya and Kurbanova Madina

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.canva.com/design/DAE7I5Rxvg4/JsLmqWe2qW2aI9DDLsjMkQ/edit?utm_content=DAE7I5Rxvg4&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
EDMOdo - Presentation by Zhansaya Iskakova

# data[].attributes.body
Brainstorming combines a relaxed, informal approach to problem solving with lateral thinking. It is a technique that maximizes the ability to generate new ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
Don’t criticize any ideas.

Encourage a wide variety of ideas.

Build on each other’s ideas.

Don’t be afraid to share unrealistic or unconventional ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
A Mind Map is an easy way to brainstorm thoughts organically without worrying about order and structure. It allows you to visually structure your ideas to help with analysis and recall.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Everyone silently writes down their ideas on a piece of paper.

2. Each person passes their paper to the person next to them who then adds to, and expands on, those ideas.

3. Keep passing the papers around until they’ve gone full circle.

4. When you’re done, share all the ideas on a whiteboard and discuss.