# data[].attributes.body
“The bourgeoisie cannot exist without a continuous revolution in the instruments of production, and therefore in the relations of society.  On the contrary, the preservation of the old patterns of production unchanged was the first condition for the existence of all previous industrial classes.  The constant revolution in production, the constant upheaval of all social conditions, the constant uncertainty and agitation, all distinguish the bourgeois era from all previous ones.” (page27)
So, what is the difference between bourgeoisie and the Previous industrial classes? and, What kind of revolution can happen?

# data[].attributes.body
“The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with clash antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (p.25)
What does the Communist Manifesto say about how the proletariat evolves as capitalism progresses and as the revolution unfolds?

# data[].attributes.body
The Communist Manifesto advocated for workers’ rights by identifying oppressive systems used by the bourgeoisie and suggesting a revolutionary path. Marx discusses the condition of the capitalist ruling class and the way in which they’ve utilized historical milestones to further their own interest. He says that “modern industry has converted the little workshop of the patriarchal master into the great factory of the industrial capitalist” (Marx, 30). From this claim and social observations, what connection can we draw between the patriarchy and capitalism?

# data[].attributes.headline
In the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx, he states that in the modern industrial society there is a problem between the bourgeoisie and proletariat. The bourgeoisie he states had played a revolutionary part in creating the modern industry. He mentions that the modern industry has broken the man's bond with his natural superiors." The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. it has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his "natural superiors" and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self interest, than callous cash payment"( Marx 26). Why doas marx think that the bergeousie created the modern industry, and how is it that the proletariat which are the lower class submitted ttheir reality easily?

# data[].attributes.subject
In the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx, he states that in the modern industrial society there is a problem between the bourgeoisie and proletariat. The bourgeoisie he states had played a revolutionary part in creating the modern industry. He mentions that the modern industry has broken the man's bond with his natural superiors." The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. it has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his "natural superiors" and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self interest, than callous cash payment"( Marx 26). Why doas marx think that the bergeousie created the modern industry, and how is it that the proletariat which are the lower class submitted ttheir reality easily?

# data[].attributes.body
How the goals of Communism such as the exploitation of class to another have an impact on historical development, such as economic?

# data[].attributes.body
In Karl Marx’s The Communist Manifesto, the author is talking about the modern bourgeois society, and the overproduction problems that might happen in these societies. It is stated by Marx that, “In these crises there breaks out an epidemic that, in all earlier epochs, would have seemed an absurdity--the epidemic of over-production. Society suddenly finds itself put back into a state of momentary barbarism; it appears as if a famine, a universal war of devastation had cut off the supply of every means of subsistence; industry and commerce seem to be destroyed; and why? Because there is too much civilisation, too much means of subsistence, too much industry, too much commerce” (Marx 29). One thing that caught my attention in this passage is that the author believes that what causes this might be that there is ‘too much civilisation.’ What does Marx mean by that, and how can there be too much civilisation in a society?

# data[].attributes.body
Marx discusses the working forces within the first chapter of this text. He discusses the introduction of machinery and the way jobs are organized. While doing that, an interesting moment catches my attention. He says: “as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wages decrease” (30). This was interesting since it should be the other way around based on the basics of economics. So a question here emerges, how is it tgat when people do not want to work a certain job the wage for it will decrease?

# data[].attributes.body
In Karl Marx's The Communist Manifesto, he was discussing the proletarian as the lowest class in a capitalist society and how different his social relations were to that of a bourgeois, which strips him of any self characteristics even with nationality, and then Marx directly follows it up with, "Law, morality, and religion, are to him so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests" (33).

What is the link between the bourgeois and social relations outside of economy?

# data[].attributes.body
Choose a quote from the text, copy and frame it, and provide a reference (page). Ask an interperetive question on the basis of it. You should bring the quote that is related to your interpretive question.

A factual question has only one correct answer, but an interpretive question has more than one answer that can be supported with evidence from the text. Interpretive questions keep discussions going and require the reader to refer back to the text.

An interpretive question calls for a careful assessment of what the author means in a work. To decide whether a question is interpretive, you should try to think of two different answers to it, based on evidence from the text. The question should express genuine interest, doubt, or curiosity. You do not necessarily have to know the answer to your question!