# data[].attributes.body
For
1. Launguage barriers will be removed. Will be easier to communicate with one universal language.
Evidence: One single language will lead to there being an ease in communicating with people from other countries.

2. There Will not be a need for translators, thus will be reduced costs for people who communicate in different languages.
Evidence: some businesses pay hundreds of dollars to translators to translate stuff between two big international company's meetings. With there being one universal language, no extra costs will be borne by the companies.
Against
3. There will not be any diversity in the world.
Evidence: Diversity is one of the most important things in the world, with there being one language, the world will not be diversified anymore.
4.  There will be a loss of ethnicity as different languages represent different cultures, thus being a disadvantage.
Evidence : languages have a history, languages are developed over many years, thus representing a separate culture everytime. Using will universal language will lead to there being no cultural differences

ROGER.

# data[].attributes.body
Content point 1: Implementing one universal language would lead to job loss.
Evidence: The introduction of one, universal language would arguably make the job of many people like linguists, language teachers and students expandable. The value of such professional will no longer be respected. What will happen to their degrees as linguistics? It will be useless.
Persuasive Devices: Emotive language and facts.

Content point 2: Exploring new languages and learning about ancient languages is super exciting.
Evidence: While learning english at school, students usually choose French or Spanish and explore their cultures which helps them know about other people and their cultures more.
Persuasive devices: Exciting tone with real life interests about students.

Content Point 3: Different languages have their own different values and history.
Evidence: Since the time dinosaurs lived, people have been communicating using symbols which has its own history- auxiliary language would destroy such histories.
Persuasive Evidence: Facts

Content Point 4: Easy to communicate with people from the same country or religion.
Evidence: It would be really convenient to have their own languages as children start learning and talking in their mother tongue which connects the child with its family.
Persuasive Devices: Creating a path of communication towards the readers and engaging them in this conversation.

Roger.

# data[].attributes.headline
KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR  

# data[].attributes.subject
KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR KUBAIR  

# data[].attributes.body
AGAINST:
CONTENT POINT#1:  it steals the identity and culture of the people.
EVIDENCE: it steals the identity of people and steals the culture and where the people come from and where they actually belong from,because it helps in show your old family background  and whats the history of your culture .
PD:facts and emotive language

CONTENT POINT #2: no secrecy in topics that cant be spoken outside in public
EVIDNECE :at times when you are with your family abroad and you are in the mall or a grocery there are times when you would not want to talk in a language which everyone understands
for eg : if you want to bargain in a mall.

CONTENT POINT #3: its good to learn new languages.
EVIDENCE:if people who love to travel should be well versed with different languages because it will be easy for them merge in the country they are travelling to for example to ask for directions and etc.
PD:facts

CONTENT POINT #4: learning one language could be a reason for job loss
EVIDENCE : when people recruit employees for a job they might also look for people who are well versed with multiple languages because then it will be better for them to understand their customers better than what they can if they both are well versed with the same language .
PD: FACTS

ROGER..

# data[].attributes.body
AGAINST-
CONTENT POINT:
1)Disruption of identity.
example- multifarious languages originated in different parts of the world are developed and flourished in their particular nature in response to ecological as well as geopolitical differences of each particular area. Therefore, any language has its unique cultural elements that describe its speakers. Replacing it with a universal language, lead to disruption of the national identity.
*PD*-fact

2)it is important to learn different languages-
example- learning different languages helps to expose us to languages of different countries.also learning them is fun .
*PD*facts

3)Not possible to have everyone in world speaking in one language.
example-it is near to impossible to establish one language for around 4 million people
*persuasive device*-fact and figures

4)Learning foreign language could be time consuming.
example:each country has it own language and hence learning each countries language could be time consuming
*PD*-facts

RODGER

# data[].attributes.body
Content Point#1: People can share their views with each other
Evidence: Many people have problems talking to people in different cities and have to struggle a lot. WIth a common language now they can communicate freely

Content Point #2:Trading becomes easy
Evidence: People who trade have to learn and talk many languages and have a lot to work with as well. So the people who are new now dont have to learn many languages to do so.

Content Point#3:  Better international communication
Evidence: Many of the previous wars occurred because of bad communication. now because of common language officials can communicate effectively and efficiently

Content Point#4: Save a lot of money
Evidence: Big corporate firms spend a lot hundreds of dollars behind translators, but now they can save a lot of money with the help of a common language.

Rogerr

# data[].attributes.body
AGAINST
Content Point #1: Loss of cultural background as languages are strongly related to the origins and roots of peoples' cultures/casts/religions.

Content Point #2: Having your own mother tongue sets you apart from the rest as it is very special to you and it represents your cultural background.

Content Point #3: Compulsorily learning a new language without being given an option could be demotivating.

Content Point #4:  Implementing one universal language will lead to losses of jobs of linguists, translators etc

Roger.

# data[].attributes.body
#FOR

1.Humanity's next step-local language would lead to world wide communication, countries could become united , beneficial for global peace  mutual understanding of each other Having a unique universal language is inevitable and will happen

2with that we wouldn't need translators, and we could communicate easier with different people

3 trade will improve highly as everyone will speak one language no trade problems
communication will be better  peed up processes concerning world communication, laws, communication between people. For example EU is translating every year hundreds of thousands of documents, processing them in every language+ making speech translation.
new languages to communicate with people easily. But if there will be just one global language there will be no need to learn other languages

4.Very useless to have over 6,000 languages 1. Waste of brain capacity
we only use about 10% of our brain. So we should really be use
ing it wisely.

roger

# data[].attributes.body
For
1. Content :People can communicate quickly and easily
Evidence:there wouldn't be aneed  for translators and people would understand each other, it would be easier to get information from around the world and saves time
Pd: facts and figures

2.content:eliminates language barriers
Evidence: lot of people spend time on learning different languages, having a common language saves time and avoid conflicts between people there are no misunderstandings and it help in maintaining peace.
Pd: facts and figures

3. Easier for tourist
Evidence: it is easier for tourist to find directions and explore places as a lot of time is taken away to understand directions and sign ,figures and numbers
P.d: facts and figures

4. Increases trade
Evidence: trade between countries would become easier if there would be a common language also students can easily study in different countries then

Nistha
Roger

# data[].attributes.body
AGAINST:
1). Content Point: Creates Controversies.
Evidence: People from one country will probably not see eye to eye with those from other countries. Therefore, people may not stop arguing when forming a universal language, let alone accepting its replacement to their own languages.
Persuasive Device: Data and Facts.

2).Content Point:  Helps children learn online.
Evidence: there are children all over the world who use the internet for studying. If there was only one common language, it would be difficult for them to learn a subject in the language they know well and can converse with.
Persuasive Device:  Data, Facts and Figures.

3)Content Point: Loss of Culture
Evidence: People in different countries speak different language, their mother tongue. If only one language was made to speak all over the world it would result in the loss of culture.
Persuasive Device: Facts.

4). Content Point:  Conversation isn't that easy as it seems.
Evidence: In a population of about 6.5 to 7 billion, it is not possible for everyone knowing the same language.
Persuasive Device: Facts and Figures.

Roger

# data[].attributes.body
1) Content Point: Learning and knowledge expansion.
Evidence: Language diversity stimulates the mind and contributes to the expansion of one's knowledge. It has also been proven to slow the effects of diseases such as Alzheimer's. Persuasive Device: Data and information.

2) Content Point: Conflicts
Evidence: Speaking the same language may lead to conflicts. For example, if the 1.5 billion people who speak english, tell the 6 billion people who don't speak english to make a language and communication shift, the world would face a lot of disagreement and dispute.
Persuasive Device: Data and statistics.

3) Content Point: Nothing distinctive and special.
Evidence: Same language would lead to no cultural diversity. With no cultural diversity, the world would be very dull, monotonous and boring.
Persuasive Device: Exaggeration

4) Content Point: Belongingness
Evidence: The people from the from the same background who speak the same language may feel a sense of belongingness and connection.
Persuasive Device: Emotive Language and data.

Roger

# data[].attributes.body
#AGAINST
1. Language shapes our culture and creates diversity . It encourages people to forget their roots and traditions
Devices used : persuasive techniques
2. It is impractical to have all people learn the same language .
Evidence : there are billions of people and it is near impossible for then to agree and learn one common language
Devices used: facts
3.Implementing one universal language will lead to job losses
Evidence: linguists , translators and language teachers will be no longer required
Devices used: facts and persuasive techniques
4. Languages will continue to evolve and new will also be formed hence a universal language can not be maintained for long .
Devices used : facts and persuasive devices
Roger

# data[].attributes.body
For

1. Using one language all around the world will make communication easier and there won't be any miscommunications.
Evidence- We only use 10% of our brain capacity so it will be easier to use one language rather than learning 3-4 languages. PD- facts and figures

2. Using a common language will help businesses function better.
Evidence- Communications with other businesses will be easier. Business travel, trade would be much easier as all countries will speak one common language. PD- facts and data

3. There will peace and the same culture around the world.
Evidence- Many people fight because they are scared of the differences between them and others, a language which everybody understand could sustain our society and there won't be many differences between people. PD- facts and data

4. Unity amongst people
Evidence- The point of the language was not to destroy every other language in the world, but to give everyone on earth a neutral way to communicate. A common language would not replace cultural languages. We would all keep our individualism, but have a perfect political language. PD- facts and data

Roger

# data[].attributes.body
FOR
Content Point #1: Easier to communicate all over the world.

Content Point #2: Makes education better globally as people can go to educate themselves anywhere in the world without facing a language barrier.

Content Point #3: Travelling can be made easier as everyone shares the same language globally. Less misunderstandings and less chances of miscommunication.

Content Point #4: Improves trading between countries as there would be no language barriers between them.

Roger.

# data[].attributes.body
FOR-
Content Point#1:It will be easier to communicate all over the world.

Content Point#2:Reduced risk of conflict.The world would not be in conflict due to mistakes in translation.

Content Point#3:People can talk to each other in one shared language to save effort and energy. It will be easier for students to take in a common educational system in a common language.

Content point#4:Improvement in trading and conferences between countries.

Roger.

# data[].attributes.body
AGAINST

Content Point #1: There is an opportunity cost of learning a foreign language. This much time could be used to do something else.
Evidence- The time used in learning a language could be used to enhance his working skills

Content Point #2: Learning a foreign can be expensive.
Evidence- It can cost a lot of money to learn a new language especially if you learn from private sources.

Content Point #3: If you learn more than one language there is a possibility that you may get weaker in your mother tongue language.
Evidence- If you learn a foreign language then your spoken mother tongue language can be messed up by 35% verbally

Content Point #4: There can be some Cultural Discrepancies
Evidence- There is a village in India where even if one person speaks another language it's taken as an offence.

ROGER

# data[].attributes.body
Content Point#1: People who don't know the the common language have to learn a new language even if they don't want to
Evidence: Chinese is the most spoken language. So if it's decided that everyone should speak Chinese now, then from the Asians to the Europeans have to learn Chinese.

Content Point#2:Culture gets affected.
Evidence: IF all people start speaking the same language they tend to leave their roots and join the new culture. This affects the culture as well as the people in culture.

Content Point#3: Practically not possible.
Evidence: It is next to impossible for all people to learn an absolutely new language. Some people are old and cant learn new languages at this age.

Content Point #4:Translators will be affected.
Evidence: If people speak common languages then there will be no need for translators. They will become extinct like dinosaurs.

# data[].attributes.body
FOR:
Content point #1
Sharing one language would eliminate the language barrier which stops people from going abroad for education or for a job.

Content point  #2
More multinational businesses can spread their businesses across the globe which will also help create more job opportunities for citizens of many countries across the globe.

Content point #3
Using one language will make communications between countries much easier. Misunderstandings between countries would be prevented.

Content point #4
Travelling around the world would be made much easier as everyone would share one common language all over the world. This would prevent miscommunications between individuals from two countries.

ROGER.

# data[].attributes.headline
Mahek Patel                                      AGAINST auxiliary language.

# data[].attributes.subject
Mahek Patel                                      AGAINST auxiliary language.

# data[].attributes.body
Content point 1: Implementing one universal language would lead to job loss.
Evidence: The introduction of one, universal language would arguably make the job of many people like linguists, language teachers and students expandable. The value of such professional will no longer be respected. What will happen to their degrees as linguistics? It will be useless.
Persuasive Devices: Emotive language and facts.

Content point 2: Exploring new languages and learning about ancient languages is super exciting.
Evidence: While learning english at school, students usually choose French or Spanish and explore their cultures which helps them know about other people and their cultures more.
Persuasive devices: Exciting tone with real life interests about students.

Content Point 3: Different languages have their own different values and history.
Evidence: Since the time dinosaurs lived, people have been communicating using symbols which has its own history- auxiliary language would destroy such histories.
Persuasive Evidence: Facts

Content Point 4: Easy to communicate with people from the same country or religion.
Evidence: It would be really convenient to have their own languages as children start learning and talking in their mother tongue which connects the child with its family.
Persuasive Devices: Creating a path of communication towards the readers and engaging them in this conversation.

Roger.

# data[].attributes.body
*AGAINST
Content Point #1: loss of culture and all that history
Evidence: since BC numerous cultures were formed each with its own different languages. if one lingua franca is to be made then all that history could be lost
PD: facts

Content Point#2: nothing unique
Evidence: knowing different languages is what sets people apart
PD: hyperbole

Content Point#3: helps children learn
Evidence: studies show that children that have learned two or more languages, learn and absorb information better.
PD: facts and figures

Content Point#4: convient
Evidence:  families often speech in their mother tongue in foreign lands.
PD: connecting to the readers

ROGER.

# data[].attributes.body
AGAINST
CONTENT POINT 1-losing language is equal to losing their ethnicity.

EVIDENCE-there are people who follow their religion  and would not like to converse in hindi or any other language because that  would disrespect their ethics as well as their religion which they would not like to do so.

PERSUASIVE DEVICE-use of facts and data.

CONTENT POINT 2-learning new languages is quite fun and not uninteresting.

EVIDENCE-there are millions and thousands of people who find it interesting in learning new things and are not reserved to a specific thing which shows us that different languages will benefit them and will not let them get bored .

PERSUASIVE DEVICE-statistical, data.

CONTENT POINT 3-there are 7000 languages in the world and people will be restricted to a single language.

EVIDENCE-having more than 7000 languages in the world , millions of people have hundreds of interests,hobbies,and love for different kinds of activities afterwhich   only one language has been restricted .

PERSUASIVE DEVICE-statistics ,power of three,data,facts.

CONTENT POINT 4-different languages are from the history of the country they are from.

EVIDENCE-in india the national language is hindi which was used because of our ancient,inspiring ,motivating leaders and maharajas.

PERSUASIVE DEVICE-facts ,data ,power of three.

ROGER.

# data[].attributes.body
AGAINST:
1.strips the people of their cultural identity
evidence: the languages are associated with peoples cultural identity and of there is only one language, then there is a loss of identity, heritage and culture.
persuasive device: facts, data and emotive language.
2.learning a new language is fun
evidence: in school, we are made to learn another language other than our mother tongue. it makes us smarter and it is interesting to learn and speak in a new language.
3. it sets a person apart from the rest
evidence: no doubt, having a single language unites everybody, but having different mother tongues is unique. in france, when the

kids are made to choose a second language, they feel like they should only focus on french.
4.having your own language makes it easier to communicate with the people in the country
evidemce: when people go shopping, they prefer it when people speak to them in the mother tongue rather than a second language.
persuasive device: facts data emotive language

# data[].attributes.body
Content Point :
1) Better Communication :There are about 8000 languages in the world and according to a report of UR (universal report) suggests that if everyone learned one language it would be better everyone it could help people understand each other and travelling  will be easier.

PD:Facts and Figures

2) Cultural differences kept aside  For instance, every country has their own language because of cultural differences and background but in school they are taught another language to be able to communicate with someone of another ethnicity if they needed to. For example I am an Indian student who is learning French, but what if I wanted to travel to Germany and did not known German? I would have to take another foreign language course.

PD: Hyperbole

3) Beneficial  for global peace Most of the wars are because of not having proper communication between nations. Countries such as USA and Canada usually have very good relationship partially because of having adequate mutual understanding of each other. This understanding between nations can be achieved when the nations and not only the intellectuals are able to communicate with each other directly.

PD: Power of Three

4) World would develop much faster! This would be the number one point to speed up processes concerning world communication, laws, communication between people. For example EU is translating every year hundreds of thousands of documents, processing them in every language+ making speech translation.This slows everything down times ten. One language would be the most important to reduce bureaucracy. One language would unify people . That is what we actually need over the world. To feel as one . But different languages create barriers of language and differences in not understanding each other. Psychologically this creates a barrier.

PD: Emotive Language

Roger Jash A.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Content Point:- The world will become a boring place

Evidence:- A global language would take away from the individuality of the differing countries and their diverse cultures. The world would be bland and if everyone was the same, new ideas and inventions would stagnate.

Devices:- Facts and Figures

2. Content Point:- Losing our culture

Evidence:- With a global language most of people will lose their culture. Language can mean a lot to a family. Without their language the family might have a different meaning.

Devices:- Facts and figures

3. Content Point:- Extinction of Translators

Evidence:- With a global language, translators will go extinct. Even cultural diversity will diminish which will not allow people to be proud of their language.

Devices:- Facts and figures

4. Content Point:-  It will never work

Evidence:- Even if a global language is implemented due to the accents of various regions and countries the language will be broken up by local dialects thus the global language won't be global anymore.

Devices:- Facts and figures

Manuviraj Khare
Roger

# data[].attributes.body
FOR
CONTENT POINT #1:it would be really easy to communicate with everyone because there are so many languages in this world so hence one mother tongue would make it really easy because there wont be translation needed.
EVIDENCE:its easy for the people who love to travel because if they go to a country or a city who dont talk in the same language it is really hard for them to sit and translate every small thing.
PD: facts and data

CONTENT POINT#2: it could help in reducing to break laws
EVIDENCE: because people who are new the country or they are just visitors, its really easy for people to misunderstand what the rules are and hence they end up breaking them. For example when people go to museums or plays and click pictures when it isnt allowed.
PD:facts and figures
CONTENT POINT #3: there have been many wars that do take place because of miscommunication that takes place between two countries or nations.
EVIDENCE: there are many countries which have good mutual understanding because they have a common language in which they communicate and communication is a really good way to maintain good relationships.
PD:facts
CONTENT POINT#4: easier and effective learning in schools
EVIDENCE:it is always better to have a common language to speak in.Because it can make it really make a difference in students performance academically. it would also better for students who come to study abroad due to transfers or whatever reasons. it would surely help the students to do well
PD: facts

ROGER.

# data[].attributes.body
#AGAINST
1. will take away the individuality of the different countries and the diverse cultures

evidence -one language would eradicatie different ways of thinking- if everyone speaks the same language
new ideas and inventions would stagnate

2.conversion isn't as easy as it seems

evidence- switching to one global language will be difficult because we have a population of 7 billion and growing

3.family structures,individul
personalities,regional believes will all be diminished

the future would not know about ancestors and their religion cultures in the past

4.one language won't end wars
a lot of people are saying that they are for the global language are commonly saying that it would end wars. a global language won't achieve world peace, wars are because one country wants to be powerful than another

roger

# data[].attributes.body
#For
Content point:  1.Communication is made easier and faster
2. It establishes uniformity and is more convenient
3. Trade and conferences between countries becomes easier and can be understood by all countries
Devices used : facts and persuasive techniques
4. When asked tourists prefer to go to places where they know the language spoken as they get a sense of comfort and understanding and exploring the place is easier
Devices used: facts and persuasive techniques
5. There will be less pressure on children to learn a new language and can focus on other skill building studies.
Devices used: facts and persuasive techniques
Roger.

# data[].attributes.body
*FOR
Content Point #1: all people can talk to each other in one shared mother tongue to save effort and energy
Evidence: we only use 10% of our brain capacity, it'll be easier for education systems and for children to take in.
PD: facts and figures

Content Point #2:reduce to rate of thefts
Evidence: 45% of thefts that take place in Thailand are of tourists due to them not reading the situation correctly.
PD: facts and figures

Content Point#3: reduce to time wasted in trying to communicate prices and directions in foreign county.
Evidence: 15% of a tourist time during vacations is spent trying to communicate directions and understand number.
PD:FActs and figures

Content Point#4: improve trading
Evidence: a study from Stanford proved that USAs sales could rise by 25% internationally if they could communicate better with asian countries.
PD: facts and figures

ROGER.

# data[].attributes.body
1.it'll be easier to communicate: in a world with so many languages, words seem to get lost in translation. if there is only one language, communication will be a whole lot easier as everyone will be able to understand and speak to each other.
evidence: theres only a certain amount of languages people know, and for the people who love travelling, its very hard as they can't communicate and even do simple things such as read signs, or buy food for themselves.
persuasive device: facts and data
2.eliminates all language barriers
evidence:many times, when new companies are set up in foreign countries, there are many language barriers between the workers and employees, it leads to great difficulty as they can't understand and its difficult with training and it hard to deal with complaints.
persuasive device: facts and data
3.travelling easier
evidence: people have to make use of translators in order to ask for directions, and basic questions.
if there is only one common language, then travelling will be very easy, as every information can be found out easily
4. makes education easier
evidence: in school, children are made to learn a second language, and it may be completely useless as they may never use it. having one langauge makes it easy as they done have to learn extra
persuasuasive devices: facts and data.

ROGER
sehar r

# data[].attributes.body
1)Content point : Easier to communicate.
Evidence: according to a survey conducted by a tourism company 55% of people said they would prefer to travel to a place where they can communicate easily
PD: facts and statistics

2)Content point: travelling becomes easier
Evidence : A survey was conducted where 60% of the people said they waste 10% of their time trying to figure out what their ways because they do not understand what the local people are saying or they have misunderstood what they are trying to say
PD: statistics

3)Content point : people will not get cheated
Evidence: due to the difference in language tourists might get cheated by shopkeepers or by using public transportation .
PD: facts

4)content point : learning different languages
Evidence: there are many languages people learn which is a waste instead people can spend that time to learn other useful things
PD: facts

Roger
Khushboo

# data[].attributes.body
FOR.
1) Content Point:  Easy to Communicate.
Evidence: If everyone spoke the same language, everyone would be able to understand each other and no one would need to learn multiple languages. This would ease people who travel a lot, and go to places that speak different languages. It would help people understand peoples culture easier, because they speak the same language. More than 50% admitted that they would prefer going to a destination where they speak the same language.
Persuasive Device: Use of Data and Facts.

2) Content Point: Easy to get Information.
Evidence: many universities provide their classes on the Internet such as podcasts, so you can take a lot of lessons whatever you like for free and in the language which is spoken all over the world.
Persuasive Device: Facts.

3)Content Point: Improves Judgement.
Evidence: People who only speak one language can judge their performance more accurately. For example schools reach many languages to students which may not help them in future, corrections for teachers correcting the same exam paper written in the same language makes their work easier.
Persuasive Device: Data and Facts

4).Content Point: Travelling becomes Easier.
Evidence:People have to make use translators in order to converse with the locals. If there is one common language spoken, it would make the work of the tourists simpler, having a conversation would be easier.
Persuasive Device: Data and Facts.

ROGER

# data[].attributes.body
FOR
content point number 1- misunderstandings between people, such as the managers and workers are reduced.

evidence-25% of the problems in business industries occurs due to the language barrier between the manager and their workers, the managers aren't able to effectively communicate with their workers.

persuasive device-statistics

content point number 2- easier communication since everyone is using one language globally

evidence- a third of the tourists travelling don't speak the native language of the place their travelling to

persuasive device-facts and figures

content point 3-  Reduces the time and money wasted by businesses.

evidence- businesses waste a lot of time and money which could've been used elsewhere, thousands of dollars and dozens of hours can go to waste just hiring a translator to help convey the message the business needs to convey.

persuasive device- facts

content point number 4- makes education and post education ( jobs ) easier and better.

evidence- 30% of kids and adults are restricted by the language barriers, they don't go abroad for better education or job opportunities solely on the fact that the native language of the place is alien to them, and the adjustment process for them would take far too long due to this.

persuasive device- statistics

ROGER

# data[].attributes.headline
Varanya                           #FOR                            1)Content point: Easier communication       Evidence: As seen in a survey conducted by Globalisation Limited (GL), a company promoting travel and tourism, more than 50% admitted that they would prefer going to a destination where they speak the same language as themselves. Hence, the implementation of having a common language will lead to an increase in tourism, which is an advantage achieved through easier communication.   Persuasive Device: Use of data, facts and statistics. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Varanya                           #FOR                            1)Content point: Easier communication       Evidence: As seen in a survey conducted by Globalisation Limited (GL), a company promoting travel and tourism, more than 50% admitted that they would prefer going to a destination where they speak the same language as themselves. Hence, the implementation of having a common language will lead to an increase in tourism, which is an advantage achieved through easier communication.   Persuasive Device: Use of data, facts and statistics. 

# data[].attributes.body
2) Content Point: No Misunderstandings

Evidence: In Prof.Michel Thomas’ expert opinion, The use of one language by all, will significantly reduce the chances of misunderstandings between communities, states and countries. This may also lead to a notable decrease in conflicts and will be one step further towards attaining world peace.

Persuasive Device: Use of data and emotive language.

3) Content Point: Easier Human Collaboration
Evidence: The CEO of Craft Ideas (CI), says that he has seen a major improvement in productivity and efficiency of his workers in the manufacturing unit ever since labourers from the same country, who speak the same language, were hired at his warehouse in India.
Persuasive Device: Data, facts and opinions.

4)Content Point: Easier and efficient learning.
Evidence: From a study conducted at British Columbia International School, it was concluded at 86% of middle school students found it a lot more easier studying from a teacher of the same decent, speaking a common language, english, that all the students were aware of, instead of a teacher speaking in a different language, French. Although the students were aware and understood french, english as a common language was a lot more comfortable. This also increased the efficiency rate of the students from 36% (with French), to 89% with english.

Persuasive Device: Data and Statistics

Roger.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Content point: Convenient Business transactions
Evidence: Wouldn't require a translator and according to a survey conducted by UniLang Ltd. also states that 60% of International trade does not successfully take place due to language barriers. Therefore, the implementation of a universal language would mean less trade barriers and free international trade.
Devices used: Facts and persuasive language

2. Content point: Would eliminate monetary fraud and theft when travelling as well as being cheated out of money.
Evidence: 93% of Italy's recorded theft is proven to be from tourists who do not speak the language.
Devices used: Facts and percentages.

3. Content Point: Increase the eligibility to study in foreign universities.
Evidence:  39% of prestigious Universities situated in Europe  do not offer any courses in English and have only 2% of foreign students. A survey conducted by the University Of Michigan proved that 87%  students feel more comfortable learning with a teacher that can communicate in a language that they familiarise with.
Devices used: Statistics and data from surveys

4: Content Point: Would have more opportunities to interact with other countries and possibly reduce racism.
Evidence: Most targeted racist attacks stem from cultural beliefs and a common language gives a sense of unification and and reduces risk of miscommunication by 94%.
Devices used: Persuasive techniques, repetition, facts and figures.

ROGER.

# data[].attributes.body
CONTENT POINT 1-people can talk to each other in a single mother tongue which makes it very convenient for them to understand.

EVIDENCE-not all people travelling to abroad know the native language so they prefer using a single language which creates no misunderstandings and provides them with pure mutual support even in the foreignland.

PERSUASIVE DEVIVE-facts,and data .

CONTENT POINT 2-it creates mutual support and solidarity among the people of the world.

EVIDENCE-there are millions of people who find it complex in conversing with different languages and as a result they would require some guidance  in the place where they are new.Using a single language among the unknown ,new and different group of people gives confidence and provides mutual support to the people.

PERSUASIVE DEVICE-statistics,power of three ,data.

CONTENT POINT 3-if people use a single language to converse they wont require any of the interpretations and translations for the others to understand or for themselves to understand.

EVIDENCE-for example ,if a person speaks in English to a person who also knows and understands English ,so the person wont require to translate or interprete anything.

PERSUASIVE DEVICE-facts and data

CONTENT POINT 4-having a single language might reduce the time wastage in explaining or describing.

EVIDENCE-50% of tourists waste their time in getting directions but if single language is being used a lot of time would be saved ,utilised,and spent on some other productive work .

PERSUASIVE DEVICE-power of three , facts and data.

ROGER.

# data[].attributes.body
FOR: the auxiliary language.

Content point 1: Most of the wars are because of not having proper communication between nations.

Evidence: Countries such as USA and Canada usually have very good relationship partially because of having adequate mutual understanding of each other. This understanding between nations can be achieved when the nations  are able to communicate with each other directly.

Persuasive devices: Statistics and data such a USA and Canada on good terms due to right communication.

Content point 2:  we wouldn't need machine translators, and we could communicate easier with different people.

Evidence: The values of each culture influence the way people within that culture communicate with each other. Without having experience with the culture, it is impossible to know which values  to be sensitive to when communicating. Machine translation cannot be sensitive to cultures’ values. This can cause problems by delivering the wrong message to your business associates or customer, or even worse offending them when you're not meaning to.

Persuasive devices: Statistics and data, saying that machine translators can cause problems in business meetings.

Content point 3: Reduce bureaucracy and speed up processes concerning world communication and laws.

Evidence:EU is translating every year hundreds of thousands of documents, processing them in every language making speech translation.This slows everything down and it takes ages to translate so many documents for EU.

Persuasive Devices: Exaggeration saying that "It would take ages to translate..." And Statistics and data stating problems faced by the EU.

Content point 4: Over 6000 languages to learn in this world.

Evidence: Waste of brain capacity.
we only use about 10% of our brain. So we should really be use
ing it wisely. There are more useful things in life than languages. Like science and maths. How are the new generation expected to learn, invent and discover new things if languages are taking up a big space?

Persuasive devices: Statistics supporting the content point and rhetorical question trying to communicate with the readers hence persuading them to agree with them.

Roger.

# data[].attributes.body
Dear students welcome!

# data[].attributes.headline
Mahek Patel                          FOR: In favor of the auxiliary language. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Mahek Patel                          FOR: In favor of the auxiliary language. 

# data[].attributes.body
Content point 1: Most of the wars are because of not having proper communication between nations.

Evidence: Countries such as USA and Canada usually have very good relationship partially because of having adequate mutual understanding of each other. This understanding between nations can be achieved when the nations  are able to communicate with each other directly.

Persuasive devices: Statistics and data such a USA and Canada on good terms due to right communication.

Content point 2:  we wouldn't need machine translators, and we could communicate easier with different people.

Evidence: The values of each culture influence the way people within that culture communicate with each other. Without having experience with the culture, it is impossible to know which values  to be sensitive to when communicating. Machine translation cannot be sensitive to cultures’ values. This can cause problems by delivering the wrong message to your business associates or customer, or even worse offending them when you're not meaning to.

Persuasive devices: Statistics and data, saying that machine translators can cause problems in business meetings.

Content point 3: Reduce bureaucracy and speed up processes concerning world communication and laws.

Evidence:EU is translating every year hundreds of thousands of documents, processing them in every language making speech translation.This slows everything down and it takes ages to translate so many documents for EU.

Persuasive Devices: Exaggeration saying that "It would take ages to translate..." And Statistics and data stating problems faced by the EU.

Content point 4: Over 6000 languages to learn in this world.

Evidence: Waste of brain capacity.
we only use about 10% of our brain. So we should really be use
ing it wisely. There are more useful things in life than languages. Like science and maths. How are the new generation expected to learn, invent and discover new things if languages are taking up a big space?

Persuasive devices: Statistics supporting the content point and rhetorical question trying to communicate with the readers hence persuading them to agree with them.

Roger.

# data[].attributes.body
Point-1) No cultural diversity

Evidence-  There should not be a global language because there would be no cultural diversity if we all spoke the same language. No new ideas would be thought of and life would be very boring. Imagine you and your family want to go out to eat and you go to an Indian restaurant and all the food choices are the same as something you can get at a normal restaurant. This is what would happen if there was a global language

Persuasive device- Imperatives and Example

Point -2) Having the same language won't make the world a peaceful place

Evidence- There were many wars between people speaking the same language - Tutsi and Hutu in Rwanda, Croatians and Serbians in Yugoslavia etc.
You know, it won't work at all.
I don't want to live in a world without any diversity.
The fact we have so many languages makes the world beautiful.
We should try to preserve as many languages as we can.

Persuasive device- Imperatives and examples

Point- 3) There will be no diversity no variety of communication/entertainment can get monotonous.

Evidence- Studies have proven that people can get bored watching or listening to one language it can be monotonous and can also prevent you from learning new languages.

Persuasive language- Facts

Point-4) Cultures will be lost

Content- If we all spoke one language many traditional cultures around the world would suffer because many people wouldn't have the sense of individuality anymore. We would all be similar and the fun of visiting new places and new cultures just wouldn't be the same anymore. Why should some of the most unique cultures be put on the line because someone lacks interest to learn another language? This world is filled with complications but not being able to communicate with someone else isn't one that's a challenge that should be looked upon on as a way to become more united with people you are trying to communicate with.

Persuasive device- Facts and Imperatives

ROGER.

# data[].attributes.body
Point-1)Trade would increase drastically if everyone will communicate easily as no trade barriers.

Evidence-In a surveycommissioned by EF Education First in partnership with the Economic Intelligence Unit (EIU), of nearly 600 executives from across the world, almost half (49%) admitted that communication misunderstandings have stood in the way of major international business deals and therefore resulted in significant losses for their company. Language and cultural differences are therefore proving to be major barriers to businesses succeeding on an international level. We see this as a problem especially for companies who are making their first foray outside their native market, with almost two thirds (64%) saying that differences in language and culture have made it difficult to gain a foothold in foreign markets.

Persuasive device- Use of facts and figures

Point-2)-useless to have over 6,000 languages

Evidence-Waste of brain capacity
we only use about 10% of our brain. So we should really be use
ing it wisely. I am sure you will agree! There are more useful things in life than languages. Like science and maths. How are the new generation expected to learn, invent and discover new things if languages are taking up a big wad of the space.

One global language, like english would be more useful for more than one reason. I could list 50. But i only put one above.

Persuasive device- Imperatives and facts and stats

Point-3) Lesser conflicts and disputes between people

Evidence-  A study says people can understand each other and communicate properly this will reduce miscommunications and reduce faults and issues resulting in saving time and being more efficient.

Persuasive device- Facts and examples

Point-4)- Reduce the rate of theft

Evidence-  45% of thefts that take place in Thailand are of tourists due to them not reading the situation correctly.

Persuasive device- Facts and figures

ROGER.