# data[].attributes.body
The cat is dead.

# data[].attributes.body
The dog may have done something to the cat.

# data[].attributes.body
The dog attacked cat and possibly killed the cat.

# data[].attributes.body
The cat was buried in the dirt.

# data[].attributes.body
Group 3

The dog made the cat disappear

# data[].attributes.body
A crime was committed, bribery. Doritos were used as said bribe. It appears the man and dog were conspiring.

# data[].attributes.body
The dog was involved with the disappearance of fluffy the cat somehow if he is in fact bribing his owner.

# data[].attributes.body
The dog was involved in the disappearance of the cat.

# data[].attributes.body
Group 3

Evidence 1- the note saying you didn't see nothing

Evidence 2- the cat collar in the dirt

Evidence 3- the cat missing poster with the same collar that was seen in the dirt

Evidence 4- The man eating Doritos and replying to his wife he has not seen the cat

# data[].attributes.body
The dog was burying a collar in the beginning of the video.

The man planting flowers saw the dog doing something and then saw a poster of a missing cat.

The dog went to the man and stared him down.

The dog passed the man a bag of Doritos with a note that said “you saw nothing”

The poster showed a missing cat with a collar that looked like the one the dog was burying in the dirt.

At the end, a woman asked the guy that was planting flowers if he had seen their cat and the dog appeared at the door holding another bag of Doritos and the man replied “no”.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The dog is burying the cats collar in the dirt.

2. The dog bribes the man with Doritos with a note telling him he didn't see nothing.

3. The man looks at the cats' missing poster.

4. When the man's wife asks about the cat, the man sees the dog with another bag of Doritos and he says he doesn't know anything about the cat.

# data[].attributes.body
At 0:03 the dog buries a cat collar.

0:07 A missing cat poster is seen with the photo having the cat wear the collar we saw the dog had buried.

0:15 The dog realizes the man may have seen him do something and tries to bribe him with Doritos.

0:17 We see the bag of Doritos has a note from the Dog saying “you didn’t see nuthin.”

0:26 Man is asked if he has seen a missing cat and responds suspiciously as he realizes he may get another bag of Doritos from the dog.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The collar was hidden in the dirt

2. The dog was digging around the area where collar was located.

3. The missing cat poster

4. The picture of cat on poster shows it was wearing the collar .

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence 1: Dog is in possession of Fluffy's collar

Evidence 2: Dog is burying Fluffy's collar presumably to get rid evidence.

Evidence 3: Dog notices potential witness, man, and implements bribery ( we assume the dog wrote the note).

Evidence 4: Due to completed bribery potential witness is silenced and lies to cover up Fluffy's whereabouts.

Evidence 5: Collar is being buried is the same as the missing poster being worn by Fluffy.

Evidence 6: Dog reminds man of apparent agreement with the display of additional bags of Doritos and the bribery continues with the man lying to wife.

# data[].attributes.body
The sequence of events and the bribery makes us think the dogs actions were suspicious. The dog burring the collar makes us think he may have buried the cat or is buring the evidence. The missing cat poster confirms the cat has been missing and by the dog bribing its owner makes us believe the dog had something to do with the disappearance of the cat.

# data[].attributes.body
Bribes are often given when someone wants something from someone else like the dog giving the man Doritos.

When the dog appeared the second time with another bag of Doritos it shows reinforcement of previous agreement.

The dog growling at the man in the beginning was a scare tactic to usher compliance.

The dog appearing for the second time also reminded the man that he was being watched and better not talk.

These combined actions reinforce that the dog is guilty of malicious actions against the cat and hiding the evidence.

The dog wants to be the only family pet. The cat is the other family pet in this scene.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence 1: At 3 seconds into the video the dog can be seen moving dirt onto the cats' collar on the lawn.

Evidence 2: The cat is nowhere to be seen, and there is a missing cat poster at 7 seconds.

Evidence 3: The cat in the poster "Fluffy" appears to have the same collar as the one previously buried in the dirt at 3 seconds.

# data[].attributes.body
The dog is a consistent suspect based on questionable behavior with and towards the owner, treatment of evidence, and the frequent occurrence of bribery. The correlation of these details implies causation that the dog was involved in Fluffy's murder/disappearance. There are no apparent additional suspects.

# data[].attributes.body
The dog realized that the man was connecting the dots about the whereabouts of the cat. He bribed him with the first bag of Doritos, which is a form of admission of guilt. The second time he bribes the man, it further supports the claim that the dog had something to do with the cat's disappearance.

# data[].attributes.body
The dog and the owner are in alliance.

The owner doesn't even like cats, he's more of a dog person, the cat is his wife's cat. The cat ate the owner's Doritos, so the dog "took care of the cat" because he is both jealous of the cat having attention in the house and because he also loves his owner - DOGS ARE A MANS BEST FRIEND! So he opened the cat's door so the cat would run away. The owner didn't know he'd do this, but in the end he was happy about it.

# data[].attributes.body
We only see the collar (Evidence 1) and that the collar looks similar to the one "Fluffy" the cat was wearing (Evidence 3). We do not see any cat body parts or any evidence to conclude that any harm as come to the cat. (In Evidence 1, the clip only shows the dog putting dirt or burying the collar.) We only know that the dog knows something about the cat's disappearance.

# data[].attributes.body
We can neither confirm nor deny any harm to the cat other than the fact it is missing and the dog knows something. We know that the dog is associated with the cat's disappearance as the dog was burying the cat's collar. The cat collar looks identical to the collar on the cat picture for the Missing Poster for "Fluffy." There is not conclusive evidence that the dog has harmed the cat as the video clip only shows that dog was burying the cat's collar not cat parts.

# data[].attributes.body
The dog and man are in alliance with that cat missing. The dog provides the man with Doritos to keep him happy and quiet.

# data[].attributes.body
The dog was involved in an incident in which evidence needed to be disposed of, the dog was burying the cat’s collar. There is incriminating evidence, the dog bribing the man, that the dog may be responsible for the family cat’s demise.

# data[].attributes.body
The dog got rid of the cat in some capacity.

# data[].attributes.body
The dog is linked to the disappearance of the cat.