# data[].attributes.headline
​中秋节每十年发生在十月

# data[].attributes.body
​中秋节每十年发生在十月四号。 这是中越两国人聚在一起庆祝的活动。 它主要在中国庆祝，后来传播到亚洲其他国家。 这是庆祝的朋友和家人可以聚在一起为一个家庭团聚。 此外，家人和朋友聚在一起为未来的宝宝，配偶，甚至是美好的未来祈福。

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
English:

Mid-Autumn Day, Moon Festival, Mooncake Festival, Autumn Moon Festival

Chinese:

中秋节 zhōng qiū jié

Date:

15th day of 8th lunar month; Sep. 29, 2023; Sep. 17, 2024

Holiday:

3 days, or 8 days if close to China National Day on Oct.1

Observed by:

All Chinese people; people in some other Asian countries like Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Malaysia & Singapore.

Mid-Autumn Festival, or Mid-autumn Day, is the second grandest festival in China after the Chinese New Year. It is named so for that it is celebrated on the 15th day of the 8th lunar month, which is always in the middle of the autumn season in China.

Chinese Moon Festival

The day is also known as the Moon Festival, as at that time of the year the moon is believed to be at its fullest and brightest and Chinese always worship the moon and appreciate the full moon on that day.

Time for Family Reunion

In Chinese culture, full moon symbolizes reunion, so that they reunite with their families for celebrations. They worship the moon together, appreciate the moon together, enjoy reunion dinner and even share one mooncake to celebrate the reunion.

Read more:
11 Mid-Autumn Festival Facts You Should Know
10 Unexpected Fun Facts about Mid-Autumn Festival You don't Know

Chinese Mid-Autumn Festival is celebrated on the 15th day of 8th month in Chinese lunar calendar. In Gregorian calendar, it usually falls in September or early October.

People in mainland China enjoy one day off on the festival day which is usually connected with the weekend to be a 3-day holiday. If it falls adjacent to China National Day on October 1st, the holiday will be 8 days long, celebrated together.

In Hong Kong and Macau, people also enjoy one day off. However, it is not scheduled on the festival day, but the following day and it is usually not connected with the weekend. In Taiwan, the one day holiday falls on the festival day.

How do Chinese celebrate the Mid-Autumn Festival? - Top Activities & Traditions

This is the most popular Mid-Autumn Festival activity. Mooncakes are cookies with various fillings like nuts, read bean paste, lotus root paste, egg yolk, meat, and fruit, etc. They are usually round to symbolize the full moon and family reunion.

Read more:

Appreciate the Full Moon

In traditional Chinese culture, the moon on the festival night is believed to be the fullest and brightest of the whole year, symbolizing family reunion. Even a family member is not home, he or she is appreciating the same moon with other families, seeming like they are together.

Read more Chinese Moon Festivals to Celebrate the Full Moon

Worship the Moon

This tradition has been 3,000 years old. On the night, people set a table with mooncakes and other sacrifices towards the moon, make wishes, offer incense and kowtow to the moon. Afterwards, the families will share the sacrifices.

Enjoy family reunion dinner

During the festival, all families try their best to go home and enjoy a big feast. In addition to mooncakes, other popular dishes for the reunion dinner include osmanthus cake, osmanthus wine, crab, duck, taro, and pumpkin.

Read more: Mid-Autumn Festival Food in China - Top 10 Dishes You Must Try

Drink Osmanthus Wine

Around the festival, the Osmanthus is always in full blossom, making it a good time to make and drink osmanthus wine. It is light yellow with strong osmanthus fragrance and grape similar flavor, tasting sweet, sour and soft.

Make and Hang Festival Lanterns

This is an activity popular in Guangdong and Hong Kong areas, favored especially by kids. In other places of China, people also set Kongming lanterns to make best wishes.

Read more: Why Chinese make Mid-Autumn Festival lanterns?

Other traditions to celebrate the Mid-Autumn Festival include fire dragon dance popular in Hong Kong, playing Lord Rabbit in Beijing, and watching Qiantang River Tide in Hangzhou, etc.

Read more:

The top places are usually the best sites to appreciate the full moon, like waterside Shichahai and Beihai Park in Beijing, and West Lake in Hangzhou, where the full moon reflects clearly over the water; and high places such as World Financial Center and Jinmao Tower in Shanghai, and the top of Yellow Mountain, where one can gets closest to the moon. The ancient sites like City Wall in Xi'an are also great places to go, where many traditional ways of celebration are held.

How to Greet Each Other for Mid-Autumn Festival

Send Mid-autumn Festival Greeting Cards

Why do we celebrate the Moon Festival? The festival was originated from the moon worship to celebrate the harvest in autumn season about 3,000 years ago. About 1,800 to 2,200 years ago, the word "Mid-autumn" was started to be used to record the festival. Since 1,100 to 1,400 years ago, mooncake has been widely eaten on the festival date. In the Northern Song Dynasty about 900 to 1,000 years ago, the 15th day of 8th lunar month was finally set as the official festival date. Later, the festival became more and more popular and was celebrated national wide.

Story & Legend

As the Mid-Autumn Festival was originally derived from the worship of the moon god, many interesting stories and legends are told and spread among folklore explaining the purpose of the worship. The most famous one is the ' Chang E Flying to the Moon'. The legend goes like this:

Chang E's husband, Hou Yi was rewarded the elixir of immortality for shooting down the extra nine suns which tortured people a lot. But he would not like become immortal alone and left his wife to live in the heaven, so he gave the elixir to Chang E to keep it well. Unfortunately, one of Hou Yi's followers got to know it. One a 15th day of the 8th lunar month when Hou Yi went out hunting, that follower sneaked into Hou Yi and Cheng E's home and forced Chang E to handed over the elixir. Unhelpfully, Chang E ate the elixir, became an immortal and uncontrollably left the earth for the heaven. As she didn't want to leave her husband, she flew to the moon, the closest place to the earth in the heaven. Hou Yi, in hope of reunion, presented the mooncakes on every 15th day of the 8th lunar month since then.

Read more: 6 Most Well-Known Legends about Mid-Autumn Festival

Where is the Mid-Autumn Festival Celebrated outside China?

Due to frequent communications with China and migrations of Chinese people, Mid-Autumn Festival has become popular in other parts of the world, especially neighboring Asian countries. In addition to some shared customs, they add their own ways of celebration. For instance, in Korea, families also reunite, but their representative festival food is Songpyeon, a kind of stuffed rice cake instead of moon cake; in Japan, in addition to worshipping the moon and appreciating the full moon, house wives like to decorate their homes with flowers and pampas grass; in Vietnam, it is more like children's day in spite of eating mooncakes.

Read more: Mid-Autumn Festival in other Asian Countries: Korea, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Mid-Autumn Festival in China, 2023 Moon Cake Day

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Held on the 15th day of the 8th lunar month, the Mid-Autumn Festival, aka Moon Cake Festival, is the second grandest festival after the Chinese New Year in China.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
6 Foods To Eat During Mid-Autumn Festival!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Hi Beauties and happy Mid-Autumn Festival! It is the second most celebrated holiday in China and falls on October 4th this year! To celebrate, this episode will give you an insight of the Chinese traditional culture as it will explain what this holiday is about, legends and stories behind it, and show which foods Chinese people traditionally eat on that day with their benefits!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
All drawings were drawn by me Sources used: The Legend of Chang E." Joe Pastry. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Sept. 2013. http://www.joepastry.com/2013/the-legend-of-chang-e/. "Mid-Autumn Festival Stories." ChinaHighlights. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Sept. 2013. http://www.chinahighlights.com/travelguide/festivals/mid-autumn- festival-story.htm. "Traditional Chinese Festivals - China.org.cn." Traditional Chinese Festivals - China.org.cn. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Sept. 2013.

# data[].attributes.headline
我是一位前往台湾学习美食，文化，天气和传

# data[].attributes.body
我是一位前往台湾学习美食，文化，天气和传统的中国历史学家！台湾是一个非常有趣的景点。

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Taiwan is a food paradise. Multiple cultures, abundant produce and the people's passion for food combine to make Taiwanese cuisine a major attraction for locals and visitors alike. This video gives viewers a taste of the cuisine available in Taiwan, as well as the pluralistic society that has brought them together.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Taiwan - Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Guide to Taiwan and Taiwanese people, culture, society, language, business and social etiquette, manners, protocol and useful information.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
http://preparetoserve.com/TAIWAN Taiwanese Culture Tips: What not to do.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Shawn Stussy talks to the BBC - IST - International Stussy Tribe Old Skool

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Stussy Founder Shawn Stussy talks to the BBC about his label & what makes them stand out from the crowd.

# data[].attributes.headline
在我们的商店叫做Stussy，我们卖衣服

# data[].attributes.body
在我们的商店叫做Stussy，我们卖衣服，如T恤，长袖，毛衣，夹克/风衣。

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
How the original streetwear brand made it big without compromising its roots, told by the people that got it to where it is today.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Stüssy - The Official Website of Stüssy. Worldwide since 1980.

# data[].attributes.headline
这些故事有关于谁参与的细节以及不同角色之

# data[].attributes.body
这些故事有关于谁参与的细节以及不同角色之间的每个关系如何。

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
China is an ancient country full of mysteries and many Chinese deities and immortals can be found in China. The ancient Chinese believed in these gods, goddesses, magical beings, dragons, and ghosts and prayed to them for help. Below is a list of the 10 most famous Chinese gods and goddesses in Chinese mythology with their images.

1. Guanyin 观音

Guanyin, also known as Guanyin Pusa, is Chinese "Goddess of Mercy". She is considered to always help the distressed and hungry and gives comfort and aid wherever it is needed. Among all the Buddhist Bodhisattva, Guanyin is the most well-known one in China and liked by both young and old people.

2. Jade Emperor 玉皇大帝

Jade Emperor (or Yuhuang Dadi in mandarin Chinese) is considered the highest deity ruling the universe in Chinese Taoism. In Chinese mythological stories, he is the most powerful god and controls all gods from the Buddhist and Taoist and other religions. Jade Emperor is worshiped by ordinary Chinese people throughout all China.

3. Wangmu Niangniang 王母娘娘

Wangmu Niangniang, or the Queen Mother of the West, is the highest goddess and is the wife of the Jade Emperor in Taoism. She commands all female gods and is also a god of happiness and longevity and has magic pills which can make people live forever. She owns a Heavenly Peach Garden in which magic peach trees grow. The peach can make people perpetually young.

4. Yan Wang 阎王

Yan Wang is Chinese god of death who commands all the gods of the underworld. He has a filing book which records the life and death of every person. He gives appropriate punishment according to the conduct of each's acts during his lifetime.

5. Long Wang (Dragon King) 龙王

Long Wang, or Dragon King, is the Chinese god of the sea. He rules his own royal court and commands all creatures in water. The Dragon King also controls the rain and winds and can bring rainfall to the earth according to the order of Jade Emperor.

6. Nüwa 女娲

Nüwa is the Chinese goddess who created human beings. It was said she molded yellow mud into a figure like her, which was then alive and became the first human being. Nüwa is also known for mending the sky with five-colored stones.

7. Nezha 哪吒

Nezha is a great teen deity in Chinese mythology. Nezha was most well-known for assisting Jiang Ziya against the Shang Dynasty in the 16th-century Chinese novel Fengsheng Yanyi. In Journey to the West, Nezha was a general of the heaven. She fought the Monkey King and helped him defeat powerful demons.

8. The Eight Immortals 八仙

The Eight Immortals are a group of legendary immortals in Chinese mythology. Each Immortal has his/her own power tool to bestow life or destroy evil. They live on five islands in the east China's Bohai Sea including the famous Penglai Island in Shandong province.

9. Caishen 财神

Caishen is god in charge of wealth in Chinese mythology. Chinese people especially businessmen often offer sacrifices to Caishen at home or shops, hoping to become richer with the help of this "Chinese god of money". He is usually depicted in red clothes holding a golden rod.

10. Chang'e 嫦娥

Chang'e is the Chinese goddess of the Moon and the wife of Hou yi, a hero who shot nine suns in the ancient mythology of China. During the traditional Chinese Mid-Autumn festival, Chinese people usually offer moon cakes and stare at the moon in hopes of seeing her.

Other Chinese gods and goddesses:

Yuelao 月老 - Chinese god of love

Fuxing 福星 - Chinese god of happiness

Gonggong 共工 - Chinese god of water

ZhuGeliang 诸葛亮 - Chinese god of wisdom

Tudiye 土地爷 - Chinese earth god

XieZhi 獬豸 - Chinese god of justice

Shennongshi 神农氏 - Chinese god of medicine

Jiutianxuannv 九天玄女 - Chinese goddess of war

Xihe 羲和 - Chinese god of sun

Chinese gods are a part of Asia God culture, Do you know other famous Chinese gods and goddesses or other gods in Asia? Please let me know these god names and stories about them below.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Top 10 Most Well-known Chinese Gods and Goddesses

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
China is an ancient country full of mysteries and many Chinese deities and immortals can be found in China. The ancient Chinese believed in these gods, goddesses, magical beings, dragons, and ghosts and prayed to them for help. Below is a list of the 10 most famous Chinese gods and goddesses in Chinese mythology with their images.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
9 Most POWERFUL Gods in Chinese Mythology

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
You've Heard about the powerful gods like Poseidon and Zeus, but did you know ancient China had a lot of powerful deities as well? Here are some deities that you may be surprised about that have a whole lot of power. Get tickets to see Shen Yun Performing Arts!!

# data[].attributes.headline
在我对查理卓别林的研究中，我了解到他是一

# data[].attributes.body
在我对查理卓别林的研究中，我了解到他是一位着名的无声电影演员，他的所有电影都具有相同的独特外表。

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A new double LP of the CITY LIGHTS soundtrack is now available as part of the collection of Chaplin film soundtrack vinyls we are producing in collaboration with [PIAS] France. This deluxe edition includes two 180g vinyls (in full mono), rare bonus materials and a 24-page booklet illustrated with photographs and documents from the Chaplin Archive.

The new 4K restoration of A WOMAN OF PARIS has just been released on blu-ray and DVD by POTEMKINE films in France.

This exciting edition includes a recently recorded soundtrack based upon Chaplin's 1976 score for the film and on a selection of his 1952-1969 composition sketches, restored, orchestrated, and conducted by Timothy Brock. According to Brock, "Over the course of many weeks I aurally transcribed what Chaplin was working out on the piano, and identified about 14 finished compositions and about 20 un-finished, or incomplete, musical ideas. It is these pieces, in conjunction with some of the 1977 score, that make up the new posthumous score, 100% composed by Chaplin. I developed the new score as best I could in the Chaplin earmarks and idioms, and orchestrated it in the model of CITY LIGHTS, which was Chaplin's earliest personal attempt at orchestration, some 8 years after A WOMAN OF PARIS." Recording by the Orchestra Città Aperta. Audio Post Production by l'Immagine Ritrovata.

Bonus materials:
- Introduction by David Robinson (5')
- Chaplin Today: A Woman of Paris - Documentary by Mathias Ledoux with the participation of Liv Ullmann. (27')
- Presentation of rare archives with commentary by Arnold Lozano of the Chaplin Office (9')
- Outtakes
- United Artists signature archival footage

Professor Lisa Stein Haven takes us back to The Early Years of Charlie Chaplin, her latest book just released by White Owl (an imprint of Pen & Sword Books).
Charlie Chaplin's career has been described, critiqued, and scrutinized. There are book-length studies on Chaplin's music hall career, his career at Keystone Studios and the Mutual Studios. Somehow, his tenure with First National, however, has been largely neglected, even though it was during this several-year contractual time period that Chaplin built and occupied his own studio for the first time, that he attempted and succeeded in filming a comedy feature (The Kid) and that he helped to set up United Artists, an organization that protected the salaries and creative freedom of actors in Hollywood. This period in Chaplin's story is especially interesting because such landmark moments are accompanied by Chaplin's first marriage and divorce, the death of his first child, his friendship with French silent film comedian Max Linder , World War I and the role he would play in it, and the production and release of several unsuccessful films that marked Chaplin's first creative blockage - one that threatened his future career.

This book discusses the transitional periods just before and after the First National contract, as well as the all-important period satisfying it. Archival evidence provides most of the support for the book's assertions, from the Chaplin archive (property of Roy Export, digitised by Cineteca di Bologna, Italy), and the personal archives of other individuals or institutions discussed. Rare photos illustrate the story.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Biography, Filmography, News, Live Performances dates, Video Clips and Trailers, Music and Song Lyrics (Smile), Products, a Community. Everything you wish to know about Charlie Chaplin's life and work, and the latest News about all things Chaplin...

# data[].attributes.headline
​人造智能现在在我们的日常世界，即使我们

# data[].attributes.body
​人造智能现在在我们的日常世界，即使我们没有意识到。即使这些技术进步似乎是一件好事，但是很多人担心会接管很多工作，没有受过高等教育的人可能会失业。

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In the recent presidential election, automation and robotics got a slight reprieve from the accusations that it has been the key driver in job losses in the United States. During the campaign, the conversation shifted, thanks largely to then-candidate Trump's masterful scapegoating of Mexico and China, while calling out trade deals like NAFTA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership as clear and present threats to U.S. manufacturing.

Indeed, the administration continues to downplay automation as a factor in the U.S. economy, because that explanation runs against the political policies it hopes to enact under the guise of improving the conditions of America's workforce. On Friday, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin dismissed the prospects of artificial intelligence and automation eroding the workforce. In an interview with Axios, Mnuchin said:

"it's not even on our radar screen.... 50-100 more years" away. "I'm not worried at all" about robots displacing humans in the near future, he said, adding: "In fact I'm optimistic."

But even as some politicians look to divert attention from the issue, public focus returned to the evils of automation. The New York Times ran a story titled " The Long-Term Jobs Killer Is Not China. It's Automation," while the Associated Press explained "Why robots, not trade, are behind so many factory job losses." You get the picture. Technology is killing manufacturing jobs.

And there's truth in all of these reports. Robotics and automation have been linked to lost manufacturing jobs in the U.S., and even the most pro-technology industry analysts would have a hard time disputing it. But that simple fact raises some complicated questions.

Are we living in historically unprecedented times for job loss? Or is this part of a cycle that predates even the Industrial Revolution? Is it possible to retrain our workforce for these changes? Or will the gap between educated and non-educated workers only continue to grow?

This exceedingly complex issue has no simple solution, and any attempt by politicians to villainize or sensationalize matters will only serve to further its negative impact. Industry and government alike need to take a long, hard look at the effect of automation on industries as a means of maintaining the United States' role in manufacturing and innovation, while stemming domestic job loss.

Job loss

A number of representatives of pro-automation companies and advocacy groups I spoke with used words like "scaremongering" to describe a spate of recent reports that have raised alarm around the role of robotics in job loss. But when pressed, those same organizations will ultimately acknowledge that automation has been a driver of factory job loss in the U.S., at least in the short term.

It's pretty simple arithmetic, and something we've witnessed time and again. A much-cited Ball State University study suggests that automation has already proven a major driver of job loss this millennium. The paper notes that the decade between 2000 to 2010 marked the U.S.'s largest decline in manufacturing jobs in its history.

Those numbers are supported in part, by statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which notes that manufacturing jobs in the U.S. increased between 1994 (the year NAFTA went into effect) and 2000. After that, however, things look decidedly less rosy, with a loss of five million jobs in the intervening years. In spite of this troubling stat, productivity actually rose, according to Ball State's report.

That study only chalks up 13 percent of job loss to trade during that period, with automation constituting a major portion of that remaining job loss. "In 1998, the inflation-adjusted output per worker was much lower than it is today," write the study's authors, Michael J. Hicks and Srikant Devaraj. "This is due to a variety of factors, chief among them being the automation and information technology advances absorbed by these sectors over this time period."

Colin Parris, the vice president of Software Research at GE, is refreshingly straightforward when speaking to TechCrunch about the topic. "Yes," he says, matter-of-factly, "there will be job losses."

It's blunt, sure. But it's refreshing coming from an executive at a company so heavily invested in automation. But Parris' story, naturally, doesn't end there. His long-term projections - and those of his peers in manufacturing - are actually a fair bit sunnier.

"The only way to fight [job losses]," Parris continues, "is to train the talent that we have. Because in the future, we have to embrace robotics. It allows us to reduce cost. If I reduce cost, I have more money that I can use for innovation. The more money I have, the more new products I can create. The more products I create, the more workforce I can hire."

That's a trend that certainly has historical precedent. Technology has had a major impact on the workforce dating back at least as far as the Industrial Revolution - when various tasks became more automated and the types of jobs available changed as a result. At the turn of the last century, 41 percent of U.S. jobs were in or around agriculture. A century later, the number had plummeted to 1.9 percent.

And while technology adoption and its attendant short-term job loss certainly transformed those historical economies, that evolution of work didn't lead to mass unemployment as much as a transformation of the work being done. Changing times have traditionally closed doors and opened windows, as the old adage goes. As one representative of a major technology firm handily pointed out on background, the number of jobs that have been completely eliminated by automation boil down to one key position. It's a sentiment backed up in a Boston University study released in late 2015.

"[T]echnology rarely automates major occupations completely," writes the paper's author, James E. Bessen. "Many occupations were eliminated for a variety of reasons. In many cases, demand for the occupational services declined (e.g. boardinghouse keepers); in some cases, demand declined because of technological obsolescence (e.g. telegraph operators). This, however, is not the same as automation. In only one case - elevator operators - can the decline and disappearance of an occupation be largely attributed to automation."

So, if you work or live on a floor higher than three, maybe pour one out for the poor elevator operator, whose numbers seemed to have peaked at around 1950 when 97,000 were registered in the U.S. census and are virtually non-existent today.

If it's assumed that job automation has and will continue (in the short term, at least) to result in some form of job loss, automation's defenders point out that many of the jobs that will ultimately be displaced will be jobs that "no one really wants," or at the very least, positions that employers have difficulty keeping staffed.

"It might take employees out of what we call the 'three Ds,' a dull, dirty or dangerous job," says Bob Doyle of the Association for Advancing Automation. But "[it] puts them hopefully in a different position that creates more value to the company," he added.

Parris also cites the "three Ds" - referring specifically to flare stacks used to burn off the flammable gas from drilling operations in the Bering Sea. "These flare stacks are exposed to the elements because they're out in the ocean, and you have to have people climb these things and look to see if there's rust and corrosion," Parris explains. "Who wants to do that? They're dull, dirty and dangerous. It's a huge problem."

On a recent visit to the Massachusetts offices of industrial robotic gripper maker Soft Robotics last month, I put the question of replacing human labor with robots to CEO Carl Vause.

"There's a labor shortage in packaging, so we're working with customers in companies where they don't have enough labor to staff their factories," he answered, he says. "A lot of these companies have temporary labor constantly coming and going and worrying about training and quality and all of those challenges. So, what we're looking to automate is packing dough in a 40-degree warehouse. It's not a good job, it has a high turnover."

However, MIT economist David Autor takes issue with the notion that automation is simply replacing jobs that no one really wanted in the first place. While most of the roles displaced by technology were not particularly glamorous, they were still staffed by humans requiring steady employment to make ends meet.

"I don't think that automation will mean the end of work, but I do think the distribution consequences have been quite significant, and I do worry about those," Autor says. "I think the set of good jobs available to low educated or non-college educated workers without specialized skills is definitely contracting."

Autor, while not as apocalyptic in his vision as some of his peers, does consider growing professional dependence on machines a major contributing factor to the growing income gap between rich and poor. And it's a vicious circle, as growing unemployment makes it difficult or impossible for workers to enroll in the education required to break out of poverty.

"I think automation has had an absolutely enormous effect on the structure of work, the returns to skills and what people do with their time," says Autor. "I don't think it's created mass unemployment so far, and I don't think it will. But it has dramatically reduced the set of opportunities available to uneducated workers. And I think that's having very significant social and even political consequences."

Short versus long term

The conventional wisdom among economists holds that, while there may be some short-term job loss at the hands of automation, the vacuum will ultimately fill in over time. The notion echoes the historical precedent of things like the agriculture example. And there is probably something to the notion in some cases that increased productivity and margins provide companies with funds that allow them to expand their size and employment ranks.

"There are a lot of middle-income companies that, rather than getting rid of people when they get robots, they realize people are of value, especially if they've been working for them for a long time," says Doyle. "There's always some concern when people bring in a robot. But I think once they realize that it's there as a tool to help their companies, they really embrace it. Some of these companies... they even name the robot."

It's a rosy picture, but there's a clear caveat. As the market shifts, even the most labor-friendly companies won't be able to find new roles for the entirety of their workforce. Doyle describes different new roles that are being opened up in factories alongside robots, but the majority seem to require, if not an engineering degree, some sort of technical skill.

"The labor market for college-educated workers is very, very strong," says Autor. "And those people continue to get paid better. The set available to people who just have a college education or less has dramatically contracted as a function as well as trade, but automation has been the bigger fact. It's an important part of the growth of inequality we've seen over the past several years, the decline of earnings and fortunes of people without a college degree."

It's a deepening divide that speaks to the ever-growing need for STEM-based education that goes well beyond higher education. Common wisdom holds that the addition of productivity and the lowering of costs will open the possibility of more employment. And indeed, as factories become automated and more robots are introduced into the process, new, unforeseen categories will open up in the workforce.

But unlike some of the more entry-level manufacturing positions, companies do often have a problem filling roles that require a college education, or at the very least, specialization. As the nature of manufacturing jobs shift, so too will the divide.

While as Doyle suggests, it's in the best interest of companies to reward loyalty among employees, how many corporations will ultimately take on the financial burden of educating a changing workforce?

And even then, how much of a dent can such education really make? Larry Summers is skeptical. The National Economic Council Director turned Harvard professor who penned the bluntly titled piece "Robots are hurting middle class workers" tells TechCrunch, "I'm sure more and better STEM education would be good but doubt it is the panacea some suppose. If STEM were in genetically short supply two-thirds of engineers would not be working outside engineering and there would be more acute wage pressure across the board."

Nearshoring

Here, again, historical precedents can provide a little peace of mind. In his 2015 essay, "Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation," Autor cites an awfully familiar sounding 1961 Time Magazine story titled "The Automation Jobless," in which the author writes:

"In the past, new industries hired far more people than those they put out of business. But this is not true of many of today's new industries. . . . Today's new industries have comparatively few jobs for the unskilled or semiskilled, just the class of workers whose jobs are being eliminated by automation."

Perhaps the piece jumped the gun by half a century. Or maybe American ingenuity will simply find a new way to self-correct. There's hopefulness to be found in amongst all the doom and gloom of eroding manufacturing numbers.

"There's a lot of scaremongering stories about jobs that will disappear in 2020," Neil Kinson, Chief of Staff at Redwood Software, tells TechCrunch, "but the reality is actually that there will be jobs in 2020 that my children will move into that we don't even know exist today, as is paralleled by any of the great technological advances, whether it was automating agriculture, looms, the Industrial Revolution, whatever it is. What we're seeing is the ability to develop new services that drive growth and employment."

A newly released study conducted by the Centre for Economic and Business Research (CEBR), in conjunction with Kinson's company, notes that "A review of recent related economic studies suggests that there is a positive relationship between robotics automation and economic development."

And there does seem to be a potential silver lining in the form of nearshoring - bringing manufacturing closer to the userbase of its output.

"Natural disasters such as the Tsunami in Japan can knock out a supply chain that is insufficiently diversified, making redundancy in the system and the capability to manufacture in a number of places more attractive," Columbia Business School associate professor Rita Gunther McGrath wrote in a piece for The Wall Street Journal. "And as we see advances in automation and digitization, personnel cost as a fraction of total value created can be decreased, again making the economics of offshoring less compelling."

Automation and robotics could play a major role in making that ideal a reality. Technology has the potential to help drive down the cost of production and could ultimately even help domestic manufacturing cost competitive.

An AlixPartners study from January notes that "A decade ago, the labor-cost advantages of offshoring were clear. Today, determining the strategic location of manufacturing assets is a complex, high-stakes process." Automation is, undoubtedly, one of the key differentiators, "Two-thirds of respondents say they plan to invest a significant portion of their future capital in robotics and automation technologies[...] The case for those investments is strong: robots and automation technologies enable companies to reduce labor costs, enhance quality control, and improve throughput."

Of course, even if it does help bring manufacturing back to the U.S., nearshoring certainly won't mark a catchall solution to the recent loss of domestic manufacturing.

"I suspect we will see re-shoring of manufacturing as U.S. firms replace workers with technology and so labor costs diminish in relevance," says Summers, "but this won't help raise employment very much."

If automation does result in a return of manufacturing to the U.S., even by the most optimistic accounts it will replace jobs once reserved for humans. But many involved in the industry do point to a shift in the way industry views robotics.

Collaborative robots are being viewed as a major growth potential for the industry, leaving the machines to handle the three Ds, while a human coworker takes on tasks that are still better managed by people. "Before with robotics, we would be trying to create autonomous robots that do things themselves," says Parris. Now a lot of it is remote control ... That's new jobs that are being created."

Collaborative robots tend to be more affordable and safer than their fully automated counterparts. It's a concept that Amazon has deployed for some time now... at least since its acquisition of Kiva Systems, whose robots move shipping pallets in the company's massive fulfillment centers. "We like to think of it as a symphony of software, machine learning, computer algorithms, and people," a spokeswoman for the company told MIT in 2015. "And the people are such an important component; the technology wouldn't mean anything if you didn't have great employees that help interact and engage with it."

Staying competitive

With or without job loss, companies are going to continue to embrace robotics and automation in a major way. The bottom line for most corporations is that the bad press that comes with the elimination of what are generally regarded as low-skilled positions is offset by the savings, productivity and safety technology can provide.

But a future in which automation is ubiquitous in industries doesn't have to mean an apocalyptic elimination of jobs as we know it. IBM, predictably, has seen a silver lining in automation's influence on an evolving job market. The company's CEO Ginni Rometty recently began discussing the concept of "new collar jobs," in reference to positions augmented by things like automation and artificial intelligence.

In a letter to then-President-elect Trump, Rometty wrote, "The country should focus on infrastructure investments that incorporate Internet of things technology and artificial intelligence to improve performance."

In a conversation with TechCrunch this week, IBM exec Guruduth Banavar echoes the sentiment, referring to the newly created category as "differently skilled" jobs, rather than lumping them into the standard high- or low-skilled categories.

"If you were in the same room with me and I had a whiteboard, I'd draw a graph," he explains. "If you think of the distribution of expertise as a bell curve. If the high-end of expertise is on the right side and the low-end is on the left, there's a whole lot of medium-level expertise in the middle. That's going to shift to the right. What we consider today to be high-level expertise jobs will be taken by people who use machines in the future to fulfill some of the expertise needed."

It's a hopeful sentiment - that technology might help create new job categories, even as it displaces others. Banavar, naturally, cites the role IBM conceives of its Watson technology playing in a diverse range of fields, from medical to tax prep, augmenting the knowledge base of its users in the process.

And indeed, it reflects a historical precedent that we've seen played out time and again over practically every industry. Decades of science-fiction have taught us to be wary of robotics, and changing industries have only made us more keenly in-tune with those fears. But just because they don't represent end-times, doesn't mean they're not real.

"It's not just factory jobs," says Autor. "It's production, its clerical positions. I think there will be fewer sales workers going forward. I think retail positions will likely contract because people buy stuff online and it's less labor intensive. I think the set of good jobs available to low educated or non-college educated workers without specialized skills is definitely contracting."

When it comes to politics and economics, it's easy to engage in scapegoating. In the case of manufacturing, immigration, trade and automation, all have been on the receiving end of plenty of scrutiny over the years. And automation can certainly shoulder its share of the blame for real-world job elimination, which, as evidenced by the above BLS numbers amount to a not-insignificant five million lost manufacturing jobs since 2000.

But technology has also been a major driver in helping keep companies competitive, so to shy away from it would surely only result in even greater domestic job loss. In order to move forward, we need to embrace technology both as a means of production and a method for producing new roles.

But pulling off such a coup is going to require some massive investments in education, both on the part of the corporations looking to move valued employees into new roles and an education system preparing workers for the real world. Failure to do so will only accelerate the growing rift between so-called low- and high-skilled workers, and the whole of our economy - and future - will suffer as a result.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Technology is killing jobs, and only technology can save them

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Are we living in historically unprecedented times for job loss? Or is this part of a cycle that predates even the Industrial Revolution? Is it possible to retrain our workforce for these changes? Or will the gap between educated and non-educated workers only continue to grow?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Future of Work:  The Coming Age of Advanced Intelligence

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The International Labor Organization estimates more than 61 million jobs have been lost since 2008. It is estimated that over 500 million new jobs will need to be created by 2020 to prevent hyper-unemployment. This video examines the future of work in the context of advancements in software intelligence to addressing future job opportunities for workforces around the globe.