# data[].attributes.body
1) Which sources inspired this question? Looking Glass, Muslim Women, Historian as Participant
2) How is each source connected? They are connected in that Alice from the Looking Glass utilizes her own life experiences to develop a desire to enter the looking glass house. Then for the Muslim women source, it talks about how people's biases and their experiences results in changes in viewpoints. Then for the last source, it discusses eyewitness history which relates to the experiences of the people living during the time period.

# data[].attributes.body
*feedback here*

# data[].attributes.body
1) Muslim Women, Historian as Participant, Extra Sensory Perception
2)

# data[].attributes.body
1) Looking Glass House, Scents and Sensibility, Muslim Women
2)

# data[].attributes.body
Historian as Participant, 3D art, Muslim Women

# data[].attributes.body
Extra Sensory Perception, Scents and Sensibility

# data[].attributes.body
Historian as Participant, Muslim Women - counterexample because lack of time distance, 3D art - for literal space distance from the art itself

# data[].attributes.headline
Setting (literal - background but also, context wise) and Perception 

# data[].attributes.subject
Setting (literal - background but also, context wise) and Perception 

# data[].attributes.body
Looking Glass House, 3D Art

# data[].attributes.headline
Setting (literal - background but also, context wise) and Perception

# data[].attributes.subject
Setting (literal - background but also, context wise) and Perception

# data[].attributes.body
Scents and Sensibility, Extra Sensory Perception, 3D Art

# data[].attributes.headline
Setting (literal - background but also, context wise) and Perception

# data[].attributes.subject
Setting (literal - background but also, context wise) and Perception

# data[].attributes.body
Looking Glass House, 3D Art, Muslim Women, Historian as Participant

# data[].attributes.headline
I think both mental and physical is too much to take on

# data[].attributes.subject
I think both mental and physical is too much to take on

# data[].attributes.body
JK

# data[].attributes.headline
In a specific artwork maybe? Like sculpture or painting

# data[].attributes.subject
In a specific artwork maybe? Like sculpture or painting

# data[].attributes.body
JK

# data[].attributes.body
What would be the problem and solution associated with this question?

# data[].attributes.body
What do you mean by "time and space"? Do you mean physical distance and how they would feel about the event if they were actually there versus if they weren't?

# data[].attributes.body
I like this one. Pretty specific and focused researched question.

# data[].attributes.body
The "distance" and "time/space" link is vague and pretty broad. Narrow it down.

# data[].attributes.body
Specify! What obstacle are you talking about?

# data[].attributes.body
Quantifiable? It doesn't seem like a question that has a lot of substance and seems open ended. What event/piece are you referring to specifically? What kind of context?

# data[].attributes.body
Pretty philosophical and broad, not a problem

# data[].attributes.body
Is it really a problem or broad enough for sources

# data[].attributes.body
Concise and to the point. Excellent question.

# data[].attributes.body
This question is broad. Specify what societal values and time period you're talking about.

# data[].attributes.body
Too many things in the question to research about. Maybe condense it to the point where it's primarily focused on the literal OR figurative interpretation of the art

# data[].attributes.body
This may be hard to get sources for.

# data[].attributes.body
Would you be able to find enough research to create a substantial argument for this problem?

# data[].attributes.body
Can you find research for this?

# data[].attributes.body
What type of event? This may be a bit broad try to narrow it down a bit. Also how would this be a problem?

# data[].attributes.body
What kind of obstacles, and what kind of factors, senses? Tech? History?

# data[].attributes.body
Not enough arguing, very vaguely stated

# data[].attributes.body
This is good, youll be able to talk about like virtual relatity and the declining importance of physcial experience etc etc, many routes to go in

# data[].attributes.body
Enclose on a specific field because obstacles are too vague