# data[].attributes.body
Today, i wrote my first draft for Task 1. First, i wrote the summary and then i evaluate the text. I read the abstract of  the article firstly which helped me know the purpose of this article. And then i met a lot of specialized vocabulary in the following paragraphs and i check the dictionary  to help me read this article consistently. In addition, some theories i did not understand that i search online to understand their meanings. Scanning and skimming the whole article can deepen my comprehension of  article.
Second,  the draft contains a lot of my understanding of this article. When i write the final task 1, it can help me save time to write down it again, furthermore,  it might exist some mistakes in my draft. I can achieve improvement in final writing if i correct mistakes and add more details.
Last but not least, i have foreseen some problems that i was not  critical enough for evaluation. I need to prepare more critical answers for possible focus questions. Only in this way can my final task 1 be well-done.

# data[].attributes.body
Today, i wrote my draft for Task 2. First, i wrote the summary of article 2 and then i compare the article 1 with the article 2. At the beginning, i read the abstract and conclusion of article 2 which were beneficial to  comprehend the article's main idea. Then i began to identify the similarities and difference among the two articles' topic, methods, evidence, bias, the reliability of authors and publication, and implications of my disciplines. I found the most large number of  details  in the methodologies of these papers. Furthermore, thesaurus and Cambridge dictionary helped me a lot when i met difficulty words.
Second, although the draft of writing task 2 was incomplete,  it had a lot of critical thinking. When i  began to write the final task 2,  more my own views of the papers would raise my work to higher level. Moreover,  reading my draft again can give me more opportunities to correct the grammar mistakes and master a new writing style which is comparison essays.
Last but not least, i have foresee several issues: How could i make my essay short and clean? What methods can help me state my opinions without ambiguity? Do i need to mention the data analysis?
If i solve these problems, i will make progress in the following  task.

# data[].attributes.headline
Task 2 Peer and Teacher Feedback Reflection

# data[].attributes.subject
Task 2 Peer and Teacher Feedback Reflection

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
PEPEAP Autumn 2017 Writing Task 3 cover sheet (3)

# data[].attributes.body
Today, i wrote my draft for Task 3.
At the beginning, i wrote the summary of the article 3. It is not difficult for me to write it because most of key ideas are in the abstract.  However, when i begin to compare the article 3 to article 1, the process had become more and more difficult than before since i need go through the two papers' content to get ideas of topic, sample, methodology, evidence, bias, author/publication's reliability, implications. Although i did not require to write all aspects,  i have to consider all these factors to improve my final writing task. Furthermore,  the draft was incomplete that in class i only had limited time to write down few ideas on the paper. After class, i would have enough time to think about what could i do for improving my writing task 3. The draft could provide some thoughts help me gather information and save time.
Finally, i have foresee some issues that as the teachers said, i am not supposed to follow the teacher's writing model all the time. If i desire for make great progress in the next year's learning, i have to give Jerry's idea which refers to my own critical thinking.

# data[].attributes.body
Huang, Z. & Benyoucef, M. (2015) User preferences of social features on social commerce websites: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 95, pp.57-72.

Pelet, J. E. & Papadopoulou, P. (2012) The effect of colors of e-commerce websites on consumer mood, memorization and buying intention. European Journal of Information Systems. 21(4), pp.438–467.