# data[].attributes.body
Both Bin Laden and John Brown had definitely brought attention to the people with their purposes of changes.  However, result of the action with both of them turned out differently,  Bin Laden didn't express his willing well to the people before he made move. Revolutions cannot be made without petition, with only  violence.

# data[].attributes.body
both start with violence which ended up not in the way they expected. But their end caused the start of the war.

# data[].attributes.body
They are both similar, they both used violence in hope that they would get the outcome they wanted

# data[].attributes.body
Osama Bin Ladin and John Brown are similar because they both used violence to fight for what they believed and in the end they both got a response from where they were trying to get a response.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the prominent Jiu-Jitsu analogy is quite suitable in here, because both John Brown and Bin Laden were trying to trigger the reaction that would be entirely enacted by the governments - the U.S. sort of would be liable for digging its own grave - reputation-wise. After this point, the strategies of John Brown and Bin Laden start being different.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they are similar. They used violence to fight a violent system, which resulted in even more violence.
though their morals are very different.
They both were catalysts, but for their followers they were heroes who died for their cause.

# data[].attributes.body
They are similar, theres no denying that. Despite the fact their morals are incredibly different- they both became a catalyst and but also became symbols or 'martyrs' to their respective followers.

# data[].attributes.body
They both killed for there cause but were killed after because of there actions.

# data[].attributes.body
they both used violence to catch the society's attention

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion they are similar.

# data[].attributes.body
They are kind of similar, and I think the terrorism made USA very strong and careful on that point.
So now is way harder to attack the US.

# data[].attributes.body
They were both to make change and are similar in the respect that neither of them worked the way they were intended at first. They also both eventually were the cause of an amplified conflict or war.

# data[].attributes.body
John Brown's and Bin Laden's motives were similar. They fought with violence hoping that force they were fighting would pull out and retreat. They were catalysts that fought with violence and both of their actions resulted in more violence in the future. Yet, John Brown's violence created positive change and 9/11 created a negative effect in America and the Middle East.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I think they are similar in strategy because they both created chaos in order to catalyze change.

# data[].attributes.body
They are similar for me because terrorism and death of John Brown made US stronger.

# data[].attributes.body
They are similar in the way that they are a catalyst, but the destruction of the Twin Towers made the US just stronger because now the US had a motive to invade them and take harder measurements. It was kind of like a big umbrella that the US could use against any protesters.