# data[].attributes.body
She went to great lengths to check for prior understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Great. Explained everything very well.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't recall when she checked my prior knowledge before hand but when as we went through the first piece of art felt she was seeing at what level we view art at the time.

# data[].attributes.body
We learned the 4 things artist look for in paintings.

# data[].attributes.headline
Gabby                                                                 She provided step by step. It was sequenced well.

# data[].attributes.subject
Gabby                                                                 She provided step by step. It was sequenced well.

# data[].attributes.body
She communicated well by answering all the questions and good eye contact.

# data[].attributes.body
She gave us practice questions where we answered together and independent work where we got theanswers later on.

# data[].attributes.body
She asked enough questions, and was aware of our understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes. Great lesson.

# data[].attributes.body
She gave great feedback and answered very effextively to the questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Natasha gave us definitions to use as tools when dissecting artworks, what they men't, and how to use those new terms/context to interpret art.

# data[].attributes.body
Thoroughly.

# data[].attributes.body
Very sequential.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes. She used verbal communication to question and clarify with her audience while referring back to the multimedia context being displayed on the screen.

# data[].attributes.body
Not opportunities but did provide examples on how to use it though guided questioning with the tools she had given us.

# data[].attributes.body
She did noticed when we looked confused on topics to question and answer to clarify points.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes

# data[].attributes.body
Yes while the lesson achieved the overall goal It could have allow for more clarification by using the tools provided to lead to self acknowledgement of what the people have learned. By referring back to the first art work that we interpreted without the tools and reinterpret it with the tools and compare how we did and see if what we said at the start would still fit into the 4 terms that we used to breakdown the artwork.

# data[].attributes.headline
I thought you did well, you checked if I had seen the works used knew who the artists were and asked if I knew what was required in a critique.

# data[].attributes.subject
I thought you did well, you checked if I had seen the works used knew who the artists were and asked if I knew what was required in a critique.

# data[].attributes.body
Tegan

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, you went through each step and provided explanations and demonstrations as required

# data[].attributes.body
Yes you spoke clearly and refered back to the presentation/slides/artworks to get your point across

# data[].attributes.body
Yes you asked if we understood the lesson content and realised if we didnt, then helped us understand

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I thought so

# data[].attributes.body
there were the questions and multiple choice to see if we could pick out which parts of others critiques fell under which category,  but we didn't write an actual critique.

# data[].attributes.body
We were given definitions to each of the components of a critique, given examples and asked questions to grasp our understanding

# data[].attributes.body
It was good

# data[].attributes.body
Yes