# data[].attributes.body
Although the argument has great diction the essay seems bland and also seems to be stretched for example the last paragraph has only two sentences the evidence helps his argument but its nothing outstanding

# data[].attributes.body
the author is clear and uses the correct amount of sources but the essay isnt

# data[].attributes.body
The essay adequately argues the position; 6 instead of 7 because it could be more complete and more devel

# data[].attributes.body
The essay had a really good structure and flowed well though some of the claims she made were not backed up by supporting evidence. Mediocre syntax

# data[].attributes.body
The writer could have done a better job at defending their position; diction and syntax were mediocre

# data[].attributes.body
The Writer makes a strong claim, and uses a sufficient amount of sources, although the authors writing seems odd and out of place.

# data[].attributes.headline
6. Sources are used well to support claims but overall reasoning behind some analysis is flawed.

# data[].attributes.subject
6. Sources are used well to support claims but overall reasoning behind some analysis is flawed.

# data[].attributes.body
There is not a clear thesis, and it is kind of confusing to know the writer's stance throughout the essay. The evidence was used poorly, and does not do a good job at development.

# data[].attributes.body
While the writer fails to meet several conventions of writing, the overall argument is supported well and the position is relatively clear when stated in the introduction.

# data[].attributes.body
The essay is able to achieve all descriptions of 6 like supporting their claim clearly and using sufficient analysis while at the same time using advanced syntax which for me gives it the edge for a 7.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a solid position and a sufficient amount of evidence and analysis to support it, however, there are several mistakes in grammar and the argument is not as elaborated on to be truly effective.

# data[].attributes.body
The author includes information in the introduction to clearly state the side he/she resides with (however, they do not provide evidence for the budget cuts). As you progress, you are being thrown information left and right, but they really dont have such a great impact on you. It is somewhat clustered

# data[].attributes.headline
7 - the position taken is defended well and the sources are cited correctly, however, the integration of the sources is choppy because no background was given on the sources, such as who the author was, and grammar/organizational mistakes can be seen 

# data[].attributes.subject
7 - the position taken is defended well and the sources are cited correctly, however, the integration of the sources is choppy because no background was given on the sources, such as who the author was, and grammar/organizational mistakes can be seen 

# data[].attributes.body
The writer's claim overall is not the strongest, however, the evidence and analysis used creates a strong connection with the claim. I think they just didn't go in depth enough with their ideas.

# data[].attributes.headline
so like idk this seems like more of a 5 but that also seems a bit to low, it's definitely not a 7 and maybe I'll change my mind later but for now I'll give this a 6

# data[].attributes.subject
so like idk this seems like more of a 5 but that also seems a bit to low, it's definitely not a 7 and maybe I'll change my mind later but for now I'll give this a 6

# data[].attributes.body
solid use of evidence, multiple minor grammatical errors and some decent diction problems. a couple subclaims were stated with no warrants or evidence. Also a weak conclusion. However, the main claim was supported acceptably enough I feel it deserves a 6 or so.

# data[].attributes.body
Although the argument has great diction, the essay seems to be stretched for example, in the last paragraph there are only two sentences. He uses a wide variety of sources that boost his score a bit, but other than that pretty good.

# data[].attributes.body
The essay has decent, clear points within it. The issue however, seems to be the little amount of evidence and the long paragraphs that made me lose focus.

# data[].attributes.body
The writer fails to use the sources efficiently but still manages to incorporate them when needed. Overall, the writer takes an explicit stance on the topic but is unconvincing.

# data[].attributes.body
While the author has a grounded stance on the subject and uses sufficent evidence to support their claim, thus creating a coherent connection with their overarching claim. However, their individual execution of the writing itself does not evoke any kind of personal constructive thought or emotion within the reader.

# data[].attributes.body
The thesis is not clearly stated , but the evidence provided is used to back up claims in the body paragraphs. There is a lot of repetition and transitions could be more fluid.

# data[].attributes.body
Though the argument clearly argues for one side and has good progression, it is not as developed as possible.

# data[].attributes.body
although the writer does make a clear stance the evidence used was uneven throughout the text.

# data[].attributes.body
The writer clearly takes a position and uses valid sources to back their argument up but they do make some grammatical and syntax errors which is why it doesn't get a 7

# data[].attributes.body
They make a decent stance on the subject and their claim is clear. However, their style is not mature and the writing is not flawless. At the same time it is not below average and their writing is not weak.

# data[].attributes.body
Solid stance on the subject with an acceptable amount of evidence and analysis. Overall,  it's a solid attempt, but it is missing that sort of flare that could give an essay like this a higher score. Diction and syntax were good also.

# data[].attributes.body
Clear ideas that flow from one to the other through the use of transitional language. Not any higher because it relies //too much on said language and uses the phrases as a crutch for wording variety. However, the author does quote incorrectly, even if they ideas are well supported

# data[].attributes.body
First that jumps off to me is that the thesis is not well articulated. This sets off a tone for the entire essay of confusion. While the warranting and explanation of her ideas are sufficient enough, they are by no means "convincing" enough to earn an eight. Her diction and syntax, while good, is not amazing and contians some lapses.

# data[].attributes.body
The writer has a clear position and supports it thoroughly. The punctuation is very poor, and the thesis is not intriguing.