# data[].attributes.body
This essay is really well written, its very complete and everything the writer wanted to explain to us was very clear. The title is really good
because it doesn't tell us if Maximilian it's good or bad. It is very well argued because he tell us all the things that were fine and it also tell us the horrible things he made, like he was a great leader, he had creative ideas, he helped to teach future generations other ways to think, thought he did try to do some good he did it in radical way, killing people and that was a real horror. What i support the most in this essay is this part "Robespierre cannot be classified as a bad nor good person, but just a human being, like everybody else." because it´s the true, everybody judge him by the way he punishes but we are all humans and we all have mistakes so i really like this essay because he never said if Maximilian was good or bad he only told us the truth about him.

# data[].attributes.body
The essay is well written he or she writed with a very god choice of words. He or she compered both things about Maximillian the hero side and the villan one. It was very good specially the last part.
I liked how the author wrote his point of view.

# data[].attributes.body
The author in his essay made a balanced comparission of the positive and the negative aspects of Maximilien Robespierre, but, in my opinion the author lacked further in the explanation of the sources of the text, because he simply said what was on the annotation in another words. Another thing that I would suggest to the author is that he/she could gave to the audience a conclusion saying his/her point of view, because as he ended with a balance argument the audience cant know if he/she approve or disapprove to Robespierre´s methods.

# data[].attributes.body
It seems to me that this essay is very complete, it has a pretty clear opinion about how this person was, the way this student describes him is easy to understand and it also highlights a little bit the good side of Robespierre.
I feel that the argument is written in an incredible way, I like how the causes of the horrible behaviors of this villain are explained.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay is really good written and with the correct words. The author gives its point of view and goes with it until the end. He/she makes its ideas clear and easy to understan. This essay gives readers precise citations to defend that point of view and the precise words to make it reliable and exact.

# data[].attributes.body
while reading this essay i can realize that she/he made it easy to understand, had a great grammar and understandable, formal words. In this essay the author is not contradicting that Robespierre was a bad person, but he is also not agreeing that he was the best person alive. And what i liked about that part of the essay is that he/she explained each situation , when he was being a selfish, rude person and also including the good things he added to the society. I wouldnt change anything of this essay because it includes great sources that expose Robespierre's real intentions that are malitious and how he made people believe he was a hero.

# data[].attributes.body
The essay clearly states the author's point of view, which is the main goal in an argument. Every source and event was fairly presented in an unbiased way, creating a reliable text. I would like to mention the way citation and word conectors were correctly used in most paragraphs. The only  aspect that somehow affects the reading and understanding process are the words used to describe some terms. Is important to make clear your point, but also to make use of other words for giving a brief understanding to the readers.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading this essay, it can be concluded that the author had very clear his/her ideas and the things he/she wanted to state. The structure of it is easy to read, it has a great introduction that clearly states what he/she means and what will be said bellow in the text. The use of sources is very well done, but the way the author explains his/hers ideas after it can be a little confusing or repetitive.

# data[].attributes.body
While reading this essay I can see that the author wanted to make his/hers point of view and write in a way I as a reader could understood seeing he/she talks about the good and bad things about Robespierre; he/she also highlight good and bad things so I could the opinion wasn't biased at all.
The grammar used in the essay is really good, he/she also used the correct words in the correct sentence but sometimes the ideas seemed repetitive and confusing to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay it’s good it on the tittle said that it would be of both sides, but in my opinion he or she talk more about that he was a hero, the grammar and vocabulary is good but in my opinion he or she could put both things but like 50|50 talking about that it was a hero and a perverted.
Grammar its good and he|she used good words and they are so formal to interpretate this.

# data[].attributes.body
From my point of view, the essay itself is good but it has some flaws. I felt that it is incomplete, as if a piece was missing from the puzzle. When I read it, I didn't feel any kind of satisfaction at the end, like if I already reed that before. Another defect is that it lacked explanation since it said what the quotes said only in different words. That is another reason why it became monotonous when reading it. It have a good structure but it can be improved. The words used are very common and that makes the essay monotonous and boring. He or she didn't quote the sentences well, something that at the end of the day became difficult to understand, like in the source D. The title given to it does not call attention to something that is considered a failure since it does not capture the readers' attention. Although it has good spelling and punctuation after all.

# data[].attributes.body
The title just fits right with what the author is expressing. Being transparent and clear in what his opinion about Robespierre intentions were. I refer to it as transparent because he is giving his opinion in both ways, positive and negative, like he expressed once that Robespierre was a good person with bad methods He made his point extremely clear.
His ways of expressing himself are stunning, he uses a great grammar and very sophisticated but easy to understand words. I really enjoyed reading this essay.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay clearly expresses the author's point of view but also tells us the other side of the story, letting us think which is correct and does not force us to think that only his point of view is correct. Also he use the sources well both to support and validate his argument and to validate part of the other side of the story even if he or she does not agree.

# data[].attributes.body
this essay has very good point of view and its structure is also good,
i lile this essay because the author makes his point of view very clear and without need to use all the resources he makes clear that robespierre was not a good person also he point that robespierre had his good things, but the most are bad .
i think the author did a very good job , you understand perfectly what he means and i agree with it.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the essay specially the title.
The title of the essay is accurate for the content of the essay, the grammar is great and esay to understand.
He or she talks a litle bit more about the villan side.
His opinions are concrete and that is why the point of the essay is very clear.

# data[].attributes.body
Since i saw the title of this essay , i could imagine that this essay would talk about how Robespierre had been someone who, despite having defended many entities, he killed a lot of people as well. The author of this essay took into account how Robespierre's ideas were good, as his goal was to end oppression and inequiality, but in the attempt he ended the lifes of many people. This essay seemed to me to have a great way of explaining Robespierre's goal, and i think it made it very clear.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay's author is convinced about his/her point of view. I really liked the way it is written and the words used. However, It feels like she/he only talked about the negative things Robespierre did and the mistakes he made, but very little about the positive things. The sources' use is clear, and supports the ideas that the author wants to state. This leads for us to feel all the emotions the author wanted to print in the essay, and, personally, that is something hard to achieve.

# data[].attributes.body
The essay clearly expresses and defends the opinion of the author toward Robespierre, but poorly mentions the positive actions and goals that represent this person. Citation was correctly used in some sentences, perhaps in others the readers can't really understand why the author decided to cite that source. The structure makes it nice and easy to read, even though maybe with a broader description or terms in the essay, we can clearly identify a thesis fairly defended.

# data[].attributes.body
I like essay have a good point. they have a good describe of robert spiers and the year of the terror. Analizing the essay is complete and have good arguments of the situation. I like the essay because i have the same opinion of robert spiers.

# data[].attributes.body
i think that the essay is very complete and explains the other side of the story. i fell that the author clarified his point of view that is that we can´t judge him as bad or good he says that he was a great leader that his methods were not the best .
i don´t really agree. i think that killing people for not doing what you say is not righ, but i respect the author opinion .

# data[].attributes.body
I really enjoyed reading this essay as it generates great thoughts of each of the sources and make you deeply think and reconsider the way you see Robespierre. The author mentions mostly the positive actions and goals that represents him as a person. This thesis has a nice structure, good grammar, well used citations in many sentences, but has a broader description. However is a clear essay.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay in my opinion is one of the best ones, the author clearly knows what is the theme, it’s described events and both sides good and let us the information so clear, so if someone that never had read this story or this event of Robespierre it would be so clear I really like this argument and this point of view.

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay has a very clear lenguage and it is easy to understand the point of view, he or she talks and appreciates a little bit more the good side of him but its ok. also I like how he  also takes in account like how different populations can be feeling beacause of him

# data[].attributes.body
The author expressed a lot of good ideas but almost all of them were negative, i dident saw that much of positive ones, although  it is still a very good essay, but  the author wrote Maximilian last name wrong and had some grammatical and spelling errors.

# data[].attributes.body
From the start, the author shows her/his point of view. He/She is able to show both sides with some quotations, but they are lacking of a good and deep explanation. The way it is written is easy to understand, but maybe is kind of simple. I would have given the essay another ending.

# data[].attributes.body
Robespierre the influence of good and evil : This is a great essay,  the way the writer use ideas To highlight the good and bad side Robespierre had was perfect, also the language he uses in the essay makes it very understandable for any type of person. He/she make clear their ideas in this essay.

# data[].attributes.body
Though the author expressed good his ideas and stated clearly from the beggining his point of view, the author in my opinion did not gave a balanced comparission, also he/she did not know how to write the Robespierre last name.
Another thing that I would suggest to the author is that he/she could separate his text into parragraphs for the readers top underestand better his/her ideas.
Other thing that I would like highlight is that when you are talking about an action that happened on the past you should use the past tense and the author committed that error several times.
And finally, I would think that for a better underestanding of the readers it would be necessary to include more punctuation marks .

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion this is a good essay, he/she talks about negative and positive aspects of Robespierre, it shows that he was a man very carried away by his opinion and that he was not satisfied with what he had already achieved, I think it is correct that he was very taken of his opinion, but actually it is not so clear what he wants to transmit is that Robespierre was bad or good, he/she leaves it in a middle point in which it cannot be said that his actions were very bad as I think, if a person reaches killing for a contradiction is because he is not reasonable and can be dangerous because Robespierre took this to an extreme hurting others. but either he/she did not defended the positive way, she explains both but does not chose one.

# data[].attributes.body
After reading this essay I can specify that he or she express her/his point of view in a very complete and understandable way. The methods he/she use are adequate and understandable, the words are appropriate and you can tell that he took the time to make the structure because it is pretty good. You could say that if someone reads this argument without knowing who Robespierre was, he could understand quite well what kind of person Robespierre was and how he was. Another aspect that makes this argument unique is that it also highlights the good side of Robespierre, he/she said that Robespierre was a good person but with bad methods. Another thing to acclaim is the title, it is pretty well because it makes the people see the essay. In my point of view, this is an essay that has no comparison.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay is very well written, starting form the fact that the author states the sources where he got the information. I also think that the title is perfect for this essay because in the beginning it tells us the good thing Robespierre did, in middle it tells us the bad decisions Robespierre made (what made him a "bad person"), and the last paragraph is summarizing the fact that he is a good man, but he has made bad decisions.

# data[].attributes.body
Only if we will read the tittle we knew that this person it’s a good man that took bad decisions, but if we read the essay and understand the story of Robespierre. The author of this essay talk about the good thoughts of Robespierre, good discipline but also it talks about the bad decisions he took, he was a good person but he took Ed another way to do the things, so the things were in the bad side.

# data[].attributes.body
i like the opinion of these argument have clue ideas and central points. i think that the form to describe the acts, the moments, etc; is so good.

# data[].attributes.body
this essay is really complete and everything the author wanted to explain was very clear. He want to tell us how Robespierre is a Villain even though he did good things, he used many sources that describe Maximilian as a monster.
I think this is a really good essay because it has many descriptions of Robespierre and many examples of the bad things he made so it
convince people that he was a terror.
Another thing i like its that it says that he made really good things but he had a big mistake that he thought the only way he can punish people was killing them.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally enjoyed reading this essay, it had great grammar, the person knew how to use the sources given to him/her. The author is stating that every person has bad and god in them and Robespierre was not an exception.
I also think the authors use of words and sources was a big plus to his/her essay.

# data[].attributes.body
The author in general aspects did good with his/her essay, he/she put a very striking beggining for the readers.
The author gave a balanced essay between the both sides of Robespierre and he/she stated since the beggining of the story his/her opinion of who Robespierre was and tried to convince with several arguments to the readers that Robespierre was a really bad person.
The author used very good the citations although I think that he/she could explained them a little bit more to ensure the understanding of all the readers.

# data[].attributes.body
I really liked this essay because unlike many, it talks about how good Robespierre was, highlights that this man was a good leader and tries to see the positive side.
This text has a lot of evidence, which I think makes it more convincing when reading it.
At the end it has a plot twist that caught my attention because at the beginning it is talking about the beneficial actions that Maximilien has done  but later it says that this person should not be remembered in a good way.

# data[].attributes.body
It is a really nice essay, pleasant to read, interesting and it's redaction is perfect. Citation was used in the best way, supporting each point of view that was impartially presented. The lenguage and use of words were nice, maybe sometimes it can seem slightly informal at times, however is not big deal. The author expressed everything in the best way and I think is important to praise that and the whole structure used throughout the essay.

# data[].attributes.body
A very complete essay, one of the best so far. I loved the way the writer clarifies his point of view, but never leaves Robespierre´s "good" side aside. He is very understandable in all the ways, the language he uses, the ideas he uses and the way he uses them. In conclusion, I really liked it, the writer did an excellent job.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this essay is very complete, have a good point and apart from being complete I totally agree with this essay. Another good thing is that the title caught our attencion a lot, is so clearly and creative and the message that she or he is trying to say. And my finally opinion is that this essay is one of the best ones and very easy to understand

# data[].attributes.body
I like this essay becaouse is very good. it has a grammar and coherence . I like that the author gives his opinion on both sides for one that Robespierre is not the best person and have bad methods but he/she also says he had good things , the author is very clear with his opinion and is easy to understand de essay . I wouldn´t change anything in the essay because is very good and i agree with the author

# data[].attributes.body
This essay was very clearly and well written he or she was so clear and he or she knows what he's talking about. When i read the title I alredy knew that i was going to speak he or she, but never imagine that this essay is in complete and clear words. My finally opinion is that is very completa this one is one of the best ones too.

# data[].attributes.body
I really liked the way he expressed his idea by quotations and comparisons, this made the essay even easier to comprehend.
As he said there is always good in all bad. Robespierre wanted the best for all his people, but he had a lot of bad qualities which made him a bad leader with good intentions.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion this essay is good but it has a lot of gramatical errors, and some phrases are difficult to understand. Readers can´t see a big comparison between what Robespierre did good and bad. Also it is written with different types of fonts and that makes it look messy.  But at the end it is a good essay because it shows the two points of view even though one stands out more.

# data[].attributes.body
in this essay we can identify clearly what was the point of view of the autor, but also he or she let os now the 2 parts of the story and the point of view in different positions, he or she citates or suports the both; at thee start has a great writting but in the last parts starts getting confusing

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay the author makes his point of view very clear. Make it clear that Robespierre was a leader with good goals but with the worst methods to achieve them. The author says that he was not a good person but not a bad person, that he is only a human like everyone else, but, I think he should have made it clear that although he
was a human with errors and defects as well as good things like others, He was a person
who killed many people and left a mark on the past of that country.

# data[].attributes.body
these essay have the 2 parts of the story, villian or hero what persons think and have her own opinion. i like that the autor writte her both opinions and give rasonable arguments.

# data[].attributes.body
The essay is well written with a choice of words very good. The author has his/her ideas very clear and he/she wants to show why does he/she believes that.
The grammar of the essay was very good and I really liked the authors point of Robespierre stating that it doesn't if you view him as hero or villain you can't ignore the good things he for the French society but if the author had explained about his point of view and the sources more it would have been great.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay was very clear to understand mostly because of the citations and the comparisons that were made throughout this thesis. The redaction and conclutions are perfect. The author was supporting both sides of Robespierre which made it impartially introduced. The language and words were a little unformal, however it doesnt change that it was a very good essay.

# data[].attributes.body
There were 3 things that caught my attention when I started reading this essay. 1. The title, it immediately robs you of your attention, and matches exactly with the ideas of the text.
2. The way the writer uses the sources, why? because for each source he used, he supported it perfectly with his words, making the text much more understandable for the reader
3. The language, good grammar, and the words you use for the text, It is concrete with all your ideas and opinions. She/He had made a great job writing this essay.

# data[].attributes.body
It was kind of short text but it had lots of information, i really like it.
He is expressing him self in a very good way, he is clear with what he is saying and what he is traing to tell. Its clear that Robespierre had good intentions, but he transmitted them by fear.
I really like this quotation “A depraved monster of small talent“ it closes and summarises the idea of the hole essay.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that this essay is pointing out to us good ideas, by giving us positive and negative aspects of thing that Robespierre did. But I wish the author went more into depth in the explanation and when he was talking about the sources. I also wish that the author would've written a concluding paragraph so that the what he or she would've better understood and clearer.

# data[].attributes.body
The author of this essay expressed his point of view well in front of this character, although, from my point of view, it is not a good and complete essay. It has several spelling and grammar mistakes. He/she misspelled Robespierre's last name and does not use the past tense in several occasions. In addition to this, he/she should use more punctuation marks such as commas and periods to make it clearly. Second, the author only focused on the bad, not giving a good comparison of whether Robespierre did good or bad. This error made the reading of the essay tedious and dull.

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay I don't see that they have made the author's point of view very clear. What I liked was that a good conclusion was drawn about how it was and what Robespierre did. About the effects of his actions, and he talked about how he had good ideals but bad methods, how he left that country marked but still made him have a better future.

# data[].attributes.body
The author's opinion is very concrete and expresses his ideas very well, which makes the essay easy to understand. I think it is a great work and I don't see anything that should be changed.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the way it started, starts determined about what he is going to talk, defends its point of view very well, leaving explicitly what he shares and what not about Robespierre's thoughts, although you can also see that he talks about his good points without leaving them aside, I think there could be more citations, and that he/she mark them better because it is not so clear to se them, I love his conclusion because it is quite clear, I like how he/she says that a leader whose objective is to oppose and execute is not specifically what France needed. Also the ending was great he/she leaved his point very clear, I like it.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay was so good because i liked it when i read it, but i don't read so i liked this essay a lot. I love the title because it is very clear and if people got to see the essay it is because of the title, it also talks about the two points of view and also that he or she of his arguments about why is that Robespierre was a villain with the mask of a hero. He or she use the correct words so that this essay is good, complete and easy to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay we can see that that author wanted to state it's point of view, by using sources that had both good and bad things about Robespierre.
The onlything that troubled me was that the sentences used by the author are a little repetitive and confusing.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay is one of the best as far, the autor makes its ideas clear and precise. This essay is easy to understand and explains really good each point of view, even though sometimes the ideas are contradicted.

# data[].attributes.body
This essay just with the title lets us know what its going to be about, the fact that Robespierre was a very controversial person. I think that he pointed out clearly the good things that Robespierre did, but also the bad ones. The only critique i have is that the end of the essay was kind of confusing.