# data[].attributes.body
They should but with limits

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should be able to control what books are in the library. That is because some books that are adult books should be in high schools teen books in middle school and elementary. Example of such books would be books with adult or teen language.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members shouldn't ban books because its their opinion that children shouldn't read those books and half of the children might actually like those books. Its also up to there parents if they should be able to read those books not the communities.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should not be allowed to control what what books are in the library, because one persons opinion on the book could be different from someone else. Maybe if you get 50 votes than it can be banned....

# data[].attributes.body
community members should accept  one an others opinions because it is a part of being a citizen. not ours

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should not be able to control what books are in the library because its just their opinion .In the book Killing Mr.smith they said it might influences others to kill there teacher.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should not be able to control what books are in the library. I find my statement true because people should be able to control what they want, and do not want to read whether its challenged or not and should be left in the libraries for people to read. For example Harry Potter is challenged because of its occult things in the book. However Harry Potter is a award winning book that is put on display all over the world.

# data[].attributes.body
the community members should not be able to because everyone has different opinions and might not agree.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should/should not be able to control what books are in the library considering the facts of the different environments people were raised in. Some could have been very sheltered as kids and others could have learned of the world early, they are going to be exposed at some point in their life. One book has been challenged because they felt it was insulting to something they have in their life. Where as another may not see it as bad, just words on a page. Its all about perspective.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should be able to but within limits, because it depends on the reader's maturity or interests and the schools don't always know what that is.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should not be able to control books in the library. One reason is, they might be bias to a type of book in libraries. Or they might be to over protective over what kids should be able read.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should be able to ban books under some conditions. If there is a book that has something inappropriate or lots of language, then they should ban the book.The books should not be banned if it is based on religion because some people believe in it. If you do not believe in the book, then parents should make the choice to let or not let the child read the book.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should NOT be able to ban or exclude certain book.

# data[].attributes.body
I do believe that community members should be able to control what books are in the library, but not for unreasonable reasons. Sometimes books are a little unreasonable with the things they talk about. If a book has full detail of the gore in a killing and it's gross and brutal, I believe it should be challenged, or at least removed from school libraries, if it simply says, "he died" I think people should grow up. When I researched the challenge of Anne Frank's diary, I can agree that it was inappropriate. When I read why Harry Potter was challenged for, I will say it again, people just need to grow up.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should not be able to control what books are in the library because people have either a liking or not a liking to a book. That doesn't necessarily mean it should be taken away. If a book has strong language, or inappropriate content, don't you think the author would know that?? The author wrote the book knowing that if it wasn't approved they could write something different. But, if an author wrote something and it would be banned or challenged, why was it approved? Why would you take away a book that was approved by the publisher? It is understandable that there could be limits set to a book if the person that had limits was a child, but if a book was meant for a child, it should be noticed that the author wanted the child to experience that topic or knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should be able to control the books in the library because most books are not suitable for most children.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should be able to control what books library's allow to exhibit. The reason is that the book could be explicit in religion or sexuality.For example, Harry Potter, or Fifty Shades of Gray.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should NOT be allowed to BAN books in a public library. I think you can have your opinion on it but they can be put into older sections but should not be banned

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should not be able to ban books because it would be one persons opinion on what books are banned.

# data[].attributes.body
Community members should not be able to do banned books because 1. its their opinion and 2. the child might be on a mature level of reading. I think teen books should be allowed in middle school but not elementary schools. On the other hand, I believe that the community should and can  have some power over what we read, but must be reasonable and just. An example would be the immortal rules is a great book but has often used profanity and romance. This does not make it a bad book, it just means mature kids should only read it.