# data[].attributes.headline
Problem is that it might lead to the falsification of evidence if the other side can think in advance how to defeat your argument

# data[].attributes.subject
Problem is that it might lead to the falsification of evidence if the other side can think in advance how to defeat your argument

# data[].attributes.body
If you're paid by clients, you have an incentive to win rather than to conform to due process

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence properly scrutinised by both sides

# data[].attributes.body
1. Prevents wrongful convictions

2. Evidence presented at trial has been fully investigated by both sides
3.  Prevents imbalance of resources

# data[].attributes.body
Preventing wrongful conviction through tactical exclusion of evidence is most important. Don't trust the bent coppers!

# data[].attributes.body
Prevents trial by ambush - most significant; we do not want to be creating a system that is very much a courtroom drama in-and-of-itself where it comes down to who can put on the greatest show for the jury, bedazzle and entertain them, and throw precedent and fact out of the window . May as well employ actors rather than lawyers

# data[].attributes.body
Cases come to fruition as quickly as possible.

# data[].attributes.body
Fairness/Due Process

# data[].attributes.headline
Appropriate rules for evidence admissibility

# data[].attributes.subject
Appropriate rules for evidence admissibility