# data[].attributes.body
1.  How are we going to feed the additional 2,5 billion people on the planet by 2050
2. Climate changes, over-fished oceans, growing water shortage,
3. Switch to commercial algae farms & producing protein-rich flour from insects.
4. Less starvation, less environment pollution

# data[].attributes.body
The future of food
1.  How to feed all the people on Earth considering to all the climate changes and the cronical hunger
2. The climate changes, the threatening to the earth,  and the main problem, how to feed all the people on earth
3. Create commercial algae farms & to make protein rich flour of insects
4.  Feed more people so less have to starve and make food without harming the enviroment
5. The acces to the raw material considering how many people it is who most get food every day

Urban farming
1. How we can start growing our food in the cities
2. Cities are very cramped, the supply of water and sunlight to the garden plots are bad
3.  New technology, community support and economical incentives
4. When your food is so locally grown you reconnect with the earth and appreciate the food more
5.  Would cost a lot of money to eastblish these plots and it would not be the most money efficient to produce the food and more laboure
6. It is not effective, cost a lot of money and generate pollution with the labour needed to establish there plots

Local food challenges and opportuniities
1. The globalization of the food, the travelling of food over the whole world.
2. Bad for the enviroment, our health, our communities and our tastebuds
3. The local alternative offers huge economic opportunities
4. the reduction in the greenhouse effect. If we start produce our own plants or buy locally food, the long distance shipping would not be important and we can take down the emissions
5.  The people living in poverty end up in a hard situation since the locally produced food is more expencive

Is reducing meat consumption in the U.S. possible?
1. How to reduce meat consumption, as it is a political, ethnic and morally rooted issue
2. Enviromental, ethnic and political aspect of the problem
3. Education,  social pressure, banning, encouragement
4. Eating less meat would be more health relatable
5. When meat factory have to shut down a lot of people will be without jobs
6. finding the perfect solution is almost impossible

# data[].attributes.body
1. There is no problem. You manipulate the genes of an organism by transplanting DNA from other organisms. This makes the seed or whatever it is as good as possible. Problem for the farmers they cannot afford the seeds. Some people claims that the food has a lot of chemical herbicides which is not good for either our health or the enviroment.
2. Poitive: you get the best food as possible. You get more food than if it wouldent be GMO, larger harvest.
Negative: its not healthy to eat much processed food. Very expensive - not all local farmers are able to afford it whcih makes their own harvests to small --> which results in lower incomsts than it could have been.
4. 60% percent of processed foods in America grocery stores contain at least some GM ingredients.  I think that sounds very unhealthy and not so nutritious.

# data[].attributes.body
Local food's challenges and opportunities
Cons of long-distance travel:
- taste
- pollution
- more packaging
- globalization affects prices for both costumers and retailers
A solution to these problems could be that farmers sell their produce locally instead of globally.
-We need to encourage people to eat locally produced food, and to eat in season. But it will take some time for people to be willing to eat mostly locally produced food.
pros and cons of eating local produce:
+Money spent on local produce benefits the community (jobs etc)
+less grennhouse gas emissions
+less packaging

Is reducing meat consumption...
How do we get ppl to eat less meat:
-campaigns
-raise taxes on meat, and have lower taxes on meat-substitutes and vegetables
-role models advocating for a non-meat based diet
-make the problems related to meat-consumption more relatatable to people

positive aspects of not eating meat:
-better health
-better for the envorinment
less transport-related gas emissions

Genetically modified food
pros:
-"design" desired crops in order to get larger yields, and a better food value, avoid insect-infested crops
cons:
-smallholders get dependent on GM seeds from multinational companies

Dumpsters to Dinner Table
Main issue: food waste
Perfectly fine food is wasted

How not to waste food
-consumers making an effort not to throw away food

# data[].attributes.body
1.The main issue in this text is how the food transport changed from local investments from nearby farms to long- distance shipping in less than a decande. That we have a solution for long- distance transport include mor packing, refridgeration and fuel and a huge amount of waste. The advances in food processing made long-term storage possible.  There is no solution to the meat consumption, but it has decreased over the last years.
2. Positive: less pollution, its healthier which decreases our healthcare costs. We save water.
Negative: no
4. About a third of greenhouse gas emissions come from the resources needed to farm cows, chickens and pigs. This is a sign of how bad it is for both us and the enviroment to eat meat.

# data[].attributes.body
Text 1
1. people starving
2. people starving
3. farming insects, and growing  algae
4. people stop starving
5. To much people on earth, maybe pollution from algae farms
6. making vegetarian food taste good, making climate friendly food suitable for all cultures
7. All´s good
8. "we will be starting with grasshoppers"

text 2.
1. polution from transport
2. polution from transport
3. local farming
4. less polution
5. urban soil may become toxic.
7. everything´s good
8. "we may soon be munching on skyscraper scallions"

text 3.
1.pollution from transport
2. pollution from transport
3. local farming
4. less pollution
5. water deficit in areas where local farming crave lots of water.
7. nope
8. "while travelling, the taste   doesn´t get any better"

text 4.
1. pollution from production of meat
2.  pollution from production of meat
3. eating less meat
4. less pollution
5. people get depressed when they can´t eat good food.
7. we want to eat meat
8. "meat, ... adds an imortant flavor to our culture"

text 5.
1. gmo leads to more herbicide and less money to farmers

2. gmo leads to more herbicide and less money to farmers
3. more gmo
4. a better world in peace
5. a worse world in war
7. that gmo leads to more pesticides and less money
8. "farmers find themselces trapped using costly technology"

text 6.
1. food waste
2. food waste
3. eat the food!!!
4. less food waste
5. we may get sick
7. people dumpster-diving
8. "the food I find in dumpsters is normally of a surprisingly good quality and quantity".

# data[].attributes.body
1. The main issue is that the land in the cities are very expensive which makes the rental for houses and apartments more expensive. Also, the soil is loaded with a lot of  toxins due to the polluted air.
2. The food doesnt need to be transported so far, which contributes to less pollutions in the air.  The plants will also take up the carbon dioxide, this doesnt affect the global warming.
3. Overall the food is often transported far and by cultivating in the city the food that is being produced becomes local, which benefit the earth.
4.“Urban soils can be loaded with lead, arsenic, and other toxins, requiring remediation or replacement before planting can be done safely.” it takes a lot of work before you can plant and harvest in the city. Is it really worth the effort?

# data[].attributes.body
1. There won´t be enough resources and food for all of the population
2.  We grow a lot more food today than just a generation ago, but the water and underground supplies aren´t enough. We´ll have to find new ways to feed the population.
3.  Eating insects and algae

Urban Farming
1.   Food has to be transported very far distances, not much is cultured locally. Negative impact on our planet, pollution and energy use.
2.  Land in cities is often expensive, and planting in cities can´t always be done safely. Getting enough water and sunlight can be concerns.
3.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  The world is running out of food. The solution is protein rich flour made out of insects as grasshoppers and to develop algae farms.
2.
Positive: insect flour is cheap to produce and the algae farms cleans up the polluted oceans.
Negative: The insects can carry diseases which makes us sick.
3. What is the complement food to the algaes?
4. The green revolution.

# data[].attributes.headline
Urban farming /Local food's challenges and opportunities

# data[].attributes.subject
Urban farming /Local food's challenges and opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
1.) Problems:  food travels long distances before ending up on our plates and this has devastating effects on the environment since these food miles emits huge amounts of carbon dioxide.
Solutions: to eat more locally produced food and to do so we have to engage in urban farming.
The positive impacts urban farming has on the society:
Adds greenery to the cities reduces harmful runoffs
A social aspect: helps people to reconnect with the earth,
offers vast economic opportunities to smallholders, for example it creates jobs and raise incomes.
Another problem:
- is rising rents due to expensive lands urbanised cities have
urban soils can be loaded with toxic substances such as arsenic. This requires remediation, could been as an ineffective method.
other challenges:
agriculture emits greenhouse gases more than gas-driven vehicles , due to the carbon dioxide that gets released when forests gets cut down in ordet to make up place for farming.