# data[].attributes.headline
It Really depends on the situation, if it was someone who knows that it was a risky or dangerous decision, they should have been ready to pay the price.

# data[].attributes.subject
It Really depends on the situation, if it was someone who knows that it was a risky or dangerous decision, they should have been ready to pay the price.

# data[].attributes.body
Tim Jett

# data[].attributes.headline
They are aware of the risks and they shouldn't need to depend on other people to fix their mistakes

# data[].attributes.subject
They are aware of the risks and they shouldn't need to depend on other people to fix their mistakes

# data[].attributes.body
Tanner Jenkins

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on the situation.

# data[].attributes.body
You can put a price on lives

# data[].attributes.body
taxes shouldn't go to people who willingly put themselves at risk, because its truly their own fault. if they do get into trouble, it should come from their own pockets. then again there are accidents and unforeseen circumstances that cause people to be put in danger when there was none before

# data[].attributes.headline
Our tax payer money should not go to people that demonstrate risky behavior.

# data[].attributes.subject
Our tax payer money should not go to people that demonstrate risky behavior.

# data[].attributes.body
When people know that their actions will be covered by the government, they are more likely to make those risky actions. Tax payer money should go towards things that are more likely to be beneficial to our average citizens, rather than towards something that not many people are likely to experience.

# data[].attributes.body
It depends but all lives matter what no matter how risky the task is.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it depends on the circumstances (it is their tax money too). But if they are taking risks, I think they should be ready to pay if something bad happens.

# data[].attributes.body
i think yes and no because some risky behavior is good.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it depends on where and what the risky behavior was.

# data[].attributes.body
I depends on whether or not it was done on purpose or if it occured accidently.

# data[].attributes.body
It depends, if it is legal and they are just exploiting the system then sure. But if it's against the law or rules then no

# data[].attributes.body
I think those that put themselves in risky situations knowingly should be ready to foot the bill before they put themselves in these places.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it depends on the circumstance, if it is clearly marked  that you should not do it then the people who do it should pay and the inverse is true.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it depends on why they are risky. If we are able to spend our tax money to help, it may help lessen risky behavior in the long run.

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on what risky means.  If it is risky as in a mental illness, then yes, they deserve help via the means of tax money. If it is something along the lines of exploiting risky behavior to receive monetary compensation then no. Things such as search and rescue services should also be allowed by the means of tax money. Accidents happen and some people will need help.

# data[].attributes.headline
as an avid hiker i have to say that the fine for rescue is very steep. I have never had to be rescued but it will cost multi thousand dollar fines for wilderness rescue. taxpayer money should be used because human life is important but the lost person is responsible for their actions and should be accountable for some portion of the cost based off of circumstances.

# data[].attributes.subject
as an avid hiker i have to say that the fine for rescue is very steep. I have never had to be rescued but it will cost multi thousand dollar fines for wilderness rescue. taxpayer money should be used because human life is important but the lost person is responsible for their actions and should be accountable for some portion of the cost based off of circumstances.

# data[].attributes.body
max Needham

# data[].attributes.body
Not, but only in part. By connecting behaviour and costs, better economic outcomes can be achieved. Formally, having people pay for their rescues is

# data[].attributes.body
Honestly no because it's pretty much their own fault for putting themselves at risk.

# data[].attributes.headline
It depends on why they are risky, if they have a mental illness that influences them then defiantly, but if they are willingly throwing themselves into that behavior for no reason then we have no reason to help them.

# data[].attributes.subject
It depends on why they are risky, if they have a mental illness that influences them then defiantly, but if they are willingly throwing themselves into that behavior for no reason then we have no reason to help them.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that people breaking the law or park regulations should have to pay for their rescue. If someone is within a parks boundaries and taking proper precautions the responsibility of their rescue and subsequent costs should fall to tax payers.

I have spoken.

# data[].attributes.body
No, we shouldn't be responsible for others financial issues