# data[].attributes.body
Read the "Demo" text, then evaluate it by answering the questions on the next post.

Click on "Add comment" to respond to the text. (only 1 post from each group allowed)

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is the author's claim and supporting reasons? Are these clearly stated and effectively connected?

2. Does the counterargument effectively address a valid critique?

3. What type of evidence is integrated? Is it relevant, effective, and properly cited?

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the link to read Text 1 and evaluate its arguments and integration of evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is the author's claim and supporting reasons? Are these clearly stated and effectively connected?

2. Does the counterargument effectively address a valid critique?

3. What type of evidence is integrated? Is it relevant, effective, and properly cited?

# data[].attributes.body
Rewrite the argument, applying the strengths and techniques observed in the Demo. Focus on improving clarity, adding well-supported evidence, and refining counterarguments to improve coherence and credibility.

Click on "Add comment" below to record your response.

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the link to read Text 1 and evaluate its arguments and integration of evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is the author's claim and supporting reasons? Are these clearly stated and effectively connected?

2. Does the counterargument effectively address a valid critique?

3. What type of evidence is integrated? Is it relevant, effective, and properly cited?

# data[].attributes.body
Rewrite the argument, applying the strengths and techniques observed in the Demo. Focus on improving clarity, adding well-supported evidence, and refining counterarguments to improve coherence and credibility.

Click on "Add comment" below to record your response.

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the link to read Text 2 and evaluate its arguments and integration of evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is the author's claim and supporting reasons? Are these clearly stated and effectively connected?

2. Does the counterargument effectively address a valid critique?

3. What type of evidence is integrated? Is it relevant, effective, and properly cited?

# data[].attributes.body
Rewrite the argument, applying the strengths and techniques observed in the Demo. Focus on improving clarity, adding well-supported evidence, and refining counterarguments to improve coherence and credibility.

Click on "Add comment" below to record your response.

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the link to read Text 2 and evaluate its arguments and integration of evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is the author's claim and supporting reasons? Are these clearly stated and effectively connected?

2. Does the counterargument effectively address a valid critique?

3. What type of evidence is integrated? Is it relevant, effective, and properly cited?

# data[].attributes.body
Rewrite the argument, applying the strengths and techniques observed in the Demo. Focus on improving clarity, adding well-supported evidence, and refining counterarguments to improve coherence and credibility.

Click on "Add comment" below to record your response.

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the link to read Text 3 and evaluate its arguments and integration of evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is the author's claim and supporting reasons? Are these clearly stated and effectively connected?

2. Does the counterargument effectively address a valid critique?

3. What type of evidence is integrated? Is it relevant, effective, and properly cited?

# data[].attributes.body
Rewrite the argument, applying the strengths and techniques observed in the Demo. Focus on improving clarity, adding well-supported evidence, and refining counterarguments to improve coherence and credibility.

Click on "Add comment" below to record your response.

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the link to read Text 3 and evaluate its arguments and integration of evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is the author's claim and supporting reasons? Are these clearly stated and effectively connected?

2. Does the counterargument effectively address a valid critique?

3. What type of evidence is integrated? Is it relevant, effective, and properly cited?

# data[].attributes.body
Rewrite the argument, applying the strengths and techniques observed in the Demo. Focus on improving clarity, adding well-supported evidence, and refining counterarguments to improve coherence and credibility.

Click on "Add comment" below to record your response.

# data[].attributes.body
1.a. Integrating social emotional learning into curriculum design is important for fostering well a rounded student's development and enhancing academic performance. Supporting reasons are; SEL programs significantly improve students' emotional intelligence,

empathy, and self-regulation. Yes, they are clearly stated and connected

2.Yes.From research findings from CASEL (2022) research suggests that the

advantages of SEL integration far outweigh these concerns. It enhances students' readiness to engage with academic content by

fostering a stable and supportive environment

3. The type of evidence employed is quotation and paraphrasing. he two have been integrated properly and are relevant.