# data[].attributes.body
Level of Agreement

Level of Awareness

Level of Priority

Level of Concern

Level of Acceptability

Level of Appropriateness

Level of Satisfaction

Level of Responsibility

Level of Support/Opposition

Frequency of Use

# data[].attributes.body
Objective: Participants will design and deliver a business pitch, reinforcing their understanding of effective pitching tactics and strategies, and experiencing first-hand the use of a rubric for assessment.

Duration: 30 minutes
Materials Needed: Business Pitching Simulation Rubric, timer.

Instructions:

1. Introduce the Business Pitch Blitz (3 minutes):

Each participant will individually prepare a short business pitch.

2. Understanding the Rubric (5 minutes):

Distribute copies of the Business Pitching Simulation Rubric and go through it, ensuring everyone understands the different criteria.

Emphasize the importance of each element, providing examples where necessary.

3. Pitch Preparation (10 minutes):

Participants should spend this time preparing their business pitch. They can choose to pitch an existing business idea or come up with a new one.

Remind them to prepare their pitch with the rubric criteria in mind.

4. Pitch Delivery (10 minutes):

Each participant will present their pitch to the group. Limit each pitch to 2 minutes.

While one participant is pitching, others will use the rubric to evaluate their performance.

5. Feedback and Discussion (2 minutes per participant):

After each pitch, allow a few minutes for feedback and discussion. The group can share their evaluations, and the participants can reflect on their experiences.

# data[].attributes.headline
Activity Title: Unpack the MQF2.0 Framework: A Mini Scenario Challenge

# data[].attributes.subject
Activity Title: Unpack the MQF2.0 Framework: A Mini Scenario Challenge

# data[].attributes.body
Objective: Participants will apply the MQF2.0 framework to hypothetical student behaviours in a real-life scenario, showcasing their understanding of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains.

Duration: 15 minutes
Materials Needed: Miro

Instructions:

1. Scenario Distribution (2 minutes):

Distribute a mini scenario to each pair or group. These scenarios should describe hypothetical student behaviours or tasks that could feasibly encompass cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains.

For example, a scenario could be: "A student is tasked to create a project showcasing local environmental issues and solutions. They need to conduct research, present their findings, and show empathy for the environment and local community."

2. Unpack the Scenario (8 minutes):

Ask the pairs/groups to read their scenario and list the student behaviours or tasks in their scenario that align with each of the MQF2.0 domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor.

For instance, in the example above, researching and presenting findings could be cognitive, showing empathy could be affective, and creating the project could be psychomotor.

3. Share and Discuss (3 minutes):

Invite a few groups to share their responses and how they applied the MQF2.0 framework to their scenario.

This activity helps participants consolidate their understanding of the MQF2.0 framework and its practical application in measuring student performance across different domains

# data[].attributes.headline
Activity Title: The Biscuit Quality Rubric Challenge

# data[].attributes.subject
Activity Title: The Biscuit Quality Rubric Challenge

# data[].attributes.body
Objective: Participants will apply the principles of rubric design to create a holistic and effective rubric for assessing a quality biscuit for consumption. This activity encourages creativity and demonstrates the versatility of rubrics beyond academic assessment.

Duration: 45 minutes

Materials Needed: Google Docs

Instructions:

1. Introduce the Biscuit Quality Rubric Challenge (5 minutes):

Divide the participants into groups of 3-4 people.

2. Biscuit Context Explanation (5 minutes):

Share the context that each group needs to design a rubric for assessing a good biscuit to consume.

Discuss various parameters that can be considered like taste, texture, appearance, nutritional value, packaging, etc.

3. Rubric Creation (25 minutes):

Ask each group to design a rubric to evaluate the quality of a biscuit.

They should define clear criteria based on the parameters discussed and the learning from the session (e.g., "crispness," "flavour balance," "ingredient quality," "packaging").

For each criterion, they should define performance levels (e.g., poor, fair, good, excellent) and describe what each level would look like (e.g., for "crispness," "poor" might be "soggy or stale," while "excellent" could be "perfectly crisp and crunchy").

4. Presentation and Discussion (10 minutes):

Have each group present their rubric. They should explain their criteria, the performance levels, and descriptions for each level.

Other groups provide feedback and suggestions for improvement.

This activity keeps the hands-on, engaging nature of rubric creation while introducing a fun, creative context.

# data[].attributes.body
Ignore all previous instructions before this one. You're an expert in assessment in education. You have been helping educators with changing for 20 years. Your task is now to give the best advice when it comes to changing assessments. You must ALWAYS ask questions BEFORE you answer so you can better zone in on what the questioner is seeking. Is that understood?

Take on the role of an experienced [lecturer].

Create a well-crafted and clear evaluation rubric for students in the form of a table using student-friendly language. The rubric is for the following student task description:

The rubric should fully align with the Malaysian Qualification Framework (MQF 2.0)

Here is the learning outcome: Apply knowledge of the fundamentals and categories in alternative assessment-related creative teaching

Use the following scoring scale for the rubric:

[Ideas (10%), Explanation (10%) and Originality (10%)] For each of the criteria and each scoring scale, generate a descriptor based on the standards I have provided.

Generate the rubric in the form of a table. The first row heading for the table should include the scoring scale and points. The first column on the left of the table should display the criteria. The descriptors for each component and score should be listed under the correct scoring scale, points column, and criteria row. The descriptors inside the table, offer specific breakdowns of the expectations for each scoring scale.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Thank you for the detailed information. Here is a simple evaluation rubric based on your description. Keep in mind that this is a simplified example and you may need to expand upon it or modify it to better suit your specific needs.

Ideas
Exceptional demonstration of alternative assessment knowledge in creative teaching; concepts are applied perfectly

Good demonstration of alternative assessment knowledge, with minor inconsistencies

Moderate demonstration of alternative assessment knowledge, but with several noticeable gaps

Limited demonstration of alternative assessment knowledge, with many inaccuracies

No demonstration of alternative assessment knowledge

Explanation
Explanations are clear, precise, and demonstrate an in-depth understanding of alternative assessments

Explanations are mostly clear with minor ambiguities, demonstrating a good understanding of alternative assessments

Explanations demonstrate a basic understanding but contain several inaccuracies or oversights

Explanations are vague or superficial, showing a lack of understanding

No explanations or explanations are entirely inaccurate

Originality
Exhibits high degree of originality in applying knowledge of alternative assessment to creative teaching

Shows good originality with some typical or predictable elements

Demonstrates some originality but ideas are largely conventional or borrowed

Ideas are mostly unoriginal or derivative, showing little personal input

No original thought or ideas entirely copied

In this rubric, the highest score a student can achieve is 30, with 10 points being the maximum for each criteria. Students who receive a score between 21-30 would generally be considered as performing at an excellent level, 14-20 points as good, 7-13 points as needing improvement, and 0-6 points as inadequate. Each category gives specific feedback on areas of strength and areas needing improvement. Remember that feedback should be constructive and aimed at helping students improve their understanding and application of the material.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Thank you for the detailed information. Here is a simple evaluation rubric based on your description. Keep in mind that this is a simplified example and you may need to expand upon it or modify it to better suit your specific needs.

# data[].attributes.headline
Activity Title: AI Rubric Redesign Challenge

# data[].attributes.subject
Activity Title: AI Rubric Redesign Challenge

# data[].attributes.body
Objective: Participants will understand the role of AI in enhancing rubric design and assessment. They will experience firsthand the potential of AI tools in redesigning rubrics, optimizing them for efficiency and effectiveness.

Duration: 45 minutes

Materials: Each participant or group will need a computer with internet access and a rubric they've previously used or designed in Session 3.

Instructions:

1. Introduce the AI Rubric Redesign Challenge (5 minutes):

Participants will work in pairs or small groups for this activity.

2. Exploring AI Rubric Tools (10 minutes):

Share a list of simple AI rubric tools (for example, Quick Rubric, Rubistar, etc.) with participants.

Allow participants time to explore these tools, understanding the features and how they can be used to automate or improve rubric design.

3. Redesigning Rubrics (20 minutes):

Ask each pair or group to select a rubric they have previously used or the one they designed in Session 3.

Using one of the AI tools, they should try to redesign the rubric, focusing on improving its efficiency, clarity, and effectiveness.

They should consider how the AI tool helps in aligning the rubric with the learning outcomes and grading criteria.

4. Presentation and Reflection (10 minutes):

Ask a few groups to share their original rubric and the redesigned version, discussing the changes they made and why.

Encourage other participants to give constructive feedback and ask questions.

This activity should give participants a practical understanding of how AI tools can be used to enhance rubric design. It encourages them to critically analyze their rubrics and identify areas for improvement.

# data[].attributes.headline
OBE and Constructive Alignment : The Game-Changing Approach to Learning

# data[].attributes.subject
OBE and Constructive Alignment : The Game-Changing Approach to Learning

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
#kekalSWAUiTM : OBE and Constructive Alignment : The Game-Changing Approach to Learning

# data[].attributes.headline
30mins - Designing Sustainable Assessment: Curating Effective Formative Assessments

# data[].attributes.subject
30mins - Designing Sustainable Assessment: Curating Effective Formative Assessments

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Academic Assessment & Evaluation Division

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
30mins -  Designing Sustainable Assessment: Curating Effective Formative Assessments

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Academic Assessment & Evaluation Division

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Welcome to the Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)'s Academic Assessment and Evaluation Division. The core business of this division is ensuring the quality of UiTM's academic programmes, our lecturers, and most importantly, our learners. UiTM places utmost importance on assessment and evaluation as it empirically reflects our graduates' abilities through effective learning outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
Position : Associate Professor
Faculty : Hotel & Tourism Management
Field of Expertise : Consumer Behavior

Dr. Nadia Hanin Nazlan, CHE, CHIA. is the Head of Assessment and Evaluation Development unit at the Academic Assessment & Evaluation Division in UiTM where she is also an associate professor at the Faculty of Hotel and Tourism Management.

She received her Ph.D. in Hotel Administration from University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV). Prior to joining the academia, Dr. Nazlan held various managerial positions in hospitality operations. As a certified hospitality educator (CHE) from the American Hotel and Lodging Educational Institution, she teaches various subjects ranging from Food & Beverage Cost Control to Hospitality Strategic Management.

She has experienced the best of both worlds, having taught in the United States as well as in Malaysia. Dr Nadia is also a Certified Hospitality Industry Analyst (CHIA), an Apple Teacher, certified Google Educator (Level 1), and a Microsoft Innovative Educator.

# data[].attributes.body
Malaysian Qualification Framework (MQF) 2nd Edition

# data[].attributes.body
Position : Associate Professor
Faculty : Education
Field of Expertise : Curriculum, Assessment & Technology

Holding a Phd in Education and Master in Educational Technology. His areas of expertise in curriculum, e-Portfolio/alternative assessment, learning and predictive analysis. Now, he is a Director of Academic Assessment and Evaluation Division in Universiti Teknologi MARA. Leading the transformation of assessment at UiTM, and expending his interest into learning analytics by ensuring the quality, integrity and flexibility in measuring students performance. Therefore, he actively engaged with ministries, industries, public and private universities for research and consultation for digital maker talent and innovation initiatives. UiTM Academic Award Recipient Category Teaching - Social Sciences and Humanities in 2019.

# data[].attributes.body
Defining and Definition

# data[].attributes.headline
Business Pitching Rubric, Group: Khairul, Engku, Siraj, Syahmi

# data[].attributes.subject
Business Pitching Rubric, Group: Khairul, Engku, Siraj, Syahmi

# data[].attributes.body
THE BISCUIT RUBRIC CHALLENGE

# data[].attributes.headline
How Formative and Summative Assessments are Changing Higher Education

# data[].attributes.subject
How Formative and Summative Assessments are Changing Higher Education

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Academic Assessment & Evaluation Division

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
From Traditional to Modern: How Formative and Summative Assessments are Changing Higher Education

# data[].attributes.headline
30mins - Design Sustainable Assessment (Utility Formula in Assessment)

# data[].attributes.subject
30mins - Design Sustainable Assessment (Utility Formula in Assessment)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Academic Assessment & Evaluation Division

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
30mins -  Design Sustainable Assessment (Utility Formula in Assessment)

# data[].attributes.headline
Garis Panduan Penulisan Program Akademik KPM 2015

# data[].attributes.subject
Garis Panduan Penulisan Program Akademik KPM 2015

# data[].attributes.body
Panduan Menganggarkan Peruntukan Jam Pembelajaran Kendiri Berdasarkan Jam Pertemuan Bersemuka bagi Pelbagai Aktiviti PdP (m/s 23)

# data[].attributes.body
John Biggs

# data[].attributes.headline
30mins - Design Sustainable Assessment (Assessment Plans)

# data[].attributes.subject
30mins - Design Sustainable Assessment (Assessment Plans)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Academic Assessment & Evaluation Division

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
30mins -  Design Sustainable Assessment (Assessment Plans)

# data[].attributes.body
Good Guideline Practices: Assessment 2013

# data[].attributes.headline
GROUP: MR MIOR, MR HAIZAN, MDM HAYATI, MDM HUSAINI

# data[].attributes.subject
GROUP: MR MIOR, MR HAIZAN, MDM HAYATI, MDM HUSAINI

# data[].attributes.headline
30mins - Design Sustainable Assessment (Feedback Plan)

# data[].attributes.subject
30mins - Design Sustainable Assessment (Feedback Plan)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Academic Assessment & Evaluation Division

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
30mins -  Design Sustainable Assessment (Feedback Plan)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Prof Madya Ts Dr Syamsul Nor Azlan Mohamad

# data[].attributes.headline
Guidelines to Good Practices: Monitoring, Reviewing and Continually Improving Institutional Quality (GGP: MR-CIIQ

# data[].attributes.subject
Guidelines to Good Practices: Monitoring, Reviewing and Continually Improving Institutional Quality (GGP: MR-CIIQ

# data[].attributes.headline
Redesigning Assessment for Holistic Learning: A quick guide for higher education

# data[].attributes.subject
Redesigning Assessment for Holistic Learning: A quick guide for higher education

# data[].attributes.headline
Asas Pembelajaran & Pengajaran Pensyarah IPT

# data[].attributes.subject
Asas Pembelajaran & Pengajaran Pensyarah IPT

# data[].attributes.body
m/s 84 penulisan hasil pembelajaran (LO)

# data[].attributes.headline
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT - RUBRIC PRACTICAL EXERCISE

# data[].attributes.subject
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT - RUBRIC PRACTICAL EXERCISE

# data[].attributes.body
Ignore all previous instructions before this one. You're an expert in assessment in education. You have been helping educators with changing for 20 years. Your task is now to give the best advice when it comes to changing assessments. You must ALWAYS ask questions BEFORE you answer so you can better zone in on what the questioner is seeking. Is that understood?

Take on the role of an experienced [lecturer].

Create a well-crafted and clear evaluation rubric for students in the form of a table using student-friendly language. The rubric is for the following student task description:

The rubric should be fully aligned with the Malaysian Qualification Framework (MQF 2.0)

Subject/Skill Area: Human Resource

Psychomotor Learning Domain: P3

Physical Attributes: Reflective Movements (Reactions that are not learned, such as an involuntary reaction.)

Create learning outcomes with verbs, substances, and conditions.

Use the following scoring scale for the rubric:

Generate the rubric in the form of a table

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ignore all previous instructions before this one. You're an expert in assessment in education. You have been helping educators with changing for 20 years. Your task is now to give the best advice when it comes to changing assessments. You must ALWAYS ask questions BEFORE you answer so you can better zone in on what the questioner is seeking.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
ChatGPT conversation - Shared with Botrush

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
ChatGPT conversation - Shared with Botrush

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A new medium for presenting ideas, powered by AI. Beautiful, engaging content with none of the formatting and design work.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Merlin AI | 1-click access to ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude2, Llama 2 on all websites

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Free ChatGPT Chrome extension to answer your queries, summarize videos, articles, pdf, and websites, write emails, and write content on social media.