# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
It's possibly the single most pondered question in history - what caused World War One? It wasn't, like in World War Two, a case of a single belligerent pushing others to take a military stand. It didn't have the moral vindication of resisting a tyrant.

Rather, a delicate but toxic balance of structural forces created a dry tinder that was lit by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo. That event precipitated the July Crisis, which saw the major European powers hurtle toward open conflict.

M-A-I-N

The M-A-I-N acronym - militarism, alliances, imperialism and nationalism - is often used to analyse the war, and each of these reasons are cited to be the 4 main causes of World War One. It's simplistic but provides a useful framework.

Militarism

The late nineteenth century was an era of military competition, particularly between the major European powers. The policy of building a stronger military was judged relative to neighbours, creating a culture of paranoia that heightened the search for alliances. It was fed by the cultural belief that war is good for nations.

Germany in particular looked to expand its navy. However, the 'naval race' was never a real contest - the British always s maintained naval superiority. But the British obsession with naval dominance was strong. Government rhetoric exaggerated military expansionism. A simple naivety in the potential scale and bloodshed of a European war prevented several governments from checking their aggression.

Alliances

A web of alliances developed in Europe between 1870 and 1914, effectively creating two camps bound by commitments to maintain sovereignty or intervene militarily - the Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance.

The Triple Alliance of 1882 linked Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy.

The Triple Entente of 1907 linked France, Britain and Russia.

A historic point of conflict between Austria Hungary and Russia was over their incompatible Balkan interests, and France had a deep suspicion of Germany rooted in their defeat in the 1870 war.

The alliance system primarily came about because after 1870 Germany, under Bismarck, set a precedent by playing its neighbours' imperial endeavours off one another, in order to maintain a balance of power within Europe

Imperialism

Imperial competition also pushed the countries towards adopting alliances. Colonies were units of exchange that could be bargained without significantly affecting the metro-pole. They also brought nations who would otherwise not interact into conflict and agreement. For example, the Russo-Japanese War (1905) over aspirations in China, helped bring the Triple Entente into being.

It has been suggested that Germany was motivated by imperial ambitions to invade Belgium and France. Certainly the expansion of the British and French empires, fired by the rise of industrialism and the pursuit of new markets, caused some resentment in Germany, and the pursuit of a short, aborted imperial policy in the late nineteenth century.

However the suggestion that Germany wanted to create a European empire in 1914 is not supported by the pre-war rhetoric and strategy.

Nationalism

Nationalism was also a new and powerful source of tension in Europe. It was tied to militarism, and clashed with the interests of the imperial powers in Europe. Nationalism created new areas of interest over which nations could compete.

For example, The Habsburg empire was tottering agglomeration of 11 different nationalities, with large slavic populations in Galicia and the Balkans whose nationalist aspirations ran counter to imperial cohesion. Nationalism in the Balkan's also piqued Russia's historic interest in the region.

Indeed, Serbian nationalism created the trigger cause of the conflict - the assassination of the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, Archduke Franz Ferdinand.

The spark: the assassination

Ferdinand and his wife were murdered in Sarajevo by Gavrilo Princip, a member of the Bosnian Serbian nationalist terrorist organization the 'Black Hand Gang.' Ferdinand's death, which was interpreted as a product of official Serbian policy, created the July Crisis - a month of diplomatic and governmental miscalculations that saw a domino effect of war declarations initiated.

The historical dialogue on this issue is vast and distorted by substantial biases. Vague and undefined schemes of reckless expansion were imputed to the German leadership in the immediate aftermath of the war with the 'war-guilt' clause. The notion that Germany was bursting with newfound strength, proud of her abilities and eager to showcase them, was overplayed.

The almost laughable rationalization of British imperial power as 'necessary' or 'civilizing' didn't translate to German imperialism, which was 'aggressive' and 'expansionist.' There is an on-going historical discussion on who if anyone was most culpable.

Blame has been directed at every single combatant at one point or another, and some have said that all the major governments considered a golden opportunity for increasing popularity at home.

The Schlieffen plan could be blamed for bringing Britain into the war, the scale of the war could be blamed on Russia as the first big country to mobilise, inherent rivalries between imperialism and capitalism could be blamed for polarising the combatants. AJP Taylor's 'timetable theory' emphasises the delicate, highly complex plans involved in mobilization which prompted ostensibly aggressive military preparations.

Every point has some merit, but in the end what proved most devastating was the combination of an alliance network with the widespread, misguided belief that war is good for nations, and that the best way to fight a modern war was to attack. That the war was inevitable is questionable, but certainly the notion of glorious war, of war as a good for nation-building, was strong pre-1914. By the end of the war, it was dead.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It's possibly the single most pondered question in history - what caused World War One? It wasn't, like in World War Two, a case of a single belligerent pushing others to take a military stand. It didn't have the moral vindication of resisting a tyrant.

# data[].attributes.body
The countries involved wanted to prove their nations importance in the world. They continued to compete with each other by building up their armies and weapons. This really helped to spark WWI.

# data[].attributes.body
Nationalism also affected people in these nations. It led to a rise in Anti Semitism which was strengthened in the war. Nations continue to be pitted against each other as Anti Semitism became a stronger idea amongst the people.

# data[].attributes.body
In the beginning of the war, nationalism caused nations to build up their armies and it led to increased militarism. It also created high tensions between nations in Europe. The tension eventually became too much and the nations went to war.

# data[].attributes.body
Germany was expanding and it wanted to build a railway from Berlin to Baghdad. At the same time, Britain and France also had interest in trading in this area so they began to compete for the land. Eventually war was declared and this helped to start WWI as more countries began to get involved.

# data[].attributes.body
Austria-Hungary wanted to expand into the balkans and Russia didn't like that. Russia limited Austria-Hungary's expansion as they also secured their own access to the black sea. Tension rose and eventually, Russia declared war on Austria-Hungary.

# data[].attributes.body
Around this time, many countries were expanding their territory and competing against each other for more land. As they continued to compete, tension around between countries. Pretty soon, the tension became too much and war broke out over the land ownership.

# data[].attributes.body
Alliances during the war joined more people together against countries and increased the size of the war. It also helped to create tension within the countries early on. This meant some countries HAD to help and join in the war as they were obliged to help certain countries.

# data[].attributes.body
The triple alliance was formed between Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy in 1882. Italy wanted to join in against France. Germany and Austria-Hungary had been alliances for a long time before this one was formed.

# data[].attributes.body
After Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, Russia joined in to help Serbia. This caused Germany to declare war on Russia as France was dragged into this. France was against both Germany and Austria-Hungary.

# data[].attributes.body
With the expanding militaries and growing tension, the military began to have more and more influence over the public. They had gained more power over the policies in the countries as the military grew. This and the tension was the push they countries needed for the war to start.

# data[].attributes.body
Many countries were competing with each other for the biggest military and this created many issues within them. It causes tension to form between the countries as they continued to grow their armies. It also caused the countries to be suspicious of each other and pushed them closer and closer to war.

# data[].attributes.body
Before the war, Germany and Great Britain both began to expand their navies while the militaries in Germany and Russia gained a better influence on public policies. The countries were each trying to build the biggest army as they competed with each other. Because of the increase in militarism, it helped to push the countries into war.