# data[].attributes.body
Can the Hub create a web page with links to all manner of foundations and private funders and a short synopsis of what the groups funds? A lot of people are unaware of the private funders out there and what they prioritize.

# data[].attributes.body
Writing Broader Impacts in today's context.

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe invite current or past grantees to share how they have secured industry or other foundational or organizational funding to extend, support or scale their work.

# data[].attributes.body
Could have, scattered throughout the year, virtual "coffee hours" where folks can join an online video chat (or in person, if geographically relevant) to continue building peer networks

# data[].attributes.body
Adapting your goals and interests to current priorities.

# data[].attributes.body
I understand that all researchers are facing a new landscape, but I am concerned that supporting "all" researchers will inadvertently return to a model where support actually goes mostly to the most elite, best historically funded, and MISSES historically underfunded groups. How will you make sure all MEANS ALL?

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe invite private funders and foundations to the meeting as exhibitors or presenters to share available opportunities

# data[].attributes.headline
Can i scale down the cost of my research to fit the current availability of funds? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Can i scale down the cost of my research to fit the current availability of funds? 

# data[].attributes.body
Is there any protection from unexpected $ freezes by having grant applications from multiple universities/departments?

# data[].attributes.body
For data management, will there be anything on open data practices? How to protect data from unscrupulous AI training?

# data[].attributes.headline
New Research Security training required for all PIs and key personnel

# data[].attributes.subject
New Research Security training required for all PIs and key personnel

# data[].attributes.body
Perhaps it would be useful for prospective grantees to see a module on what to expect in terms of administration of a grant if they are funded. This information might inform strategic partnerships for small institutions that don't have admin support - they might want to partner with a larger institution that HAS that support.

# data[].attributes.body
How many researchers are aware of venues such as The 74? Ed Week? others? There are so many venues for public-facing research findings that are just not top of mind to researchers.

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe have a virtual session of short lightening talks on their current or prospective research and use it to crowd source help. It could be a way for grantees with the desired expertise or resource to respond off line and them come together

# data[].attributes.body
While it’s great to repurpose existing resources as much as possible, for the sake of equity, there might need to be some forum for newbies to have some coaching and feedback on ideas. Prospective PIs from poorly supported institutions, may need a different kind of hand-holding, they don’t know what they don’t know, and many lack research chops to even understand what a literature review or rationale statement is for. i can think of instances where the the leader in a project thought “methods” meant how the program works, not the research.

# data[].attributes.body
There are a number of templates out there and links to them would help proposers have a framework for creating logic models.

# data[].attributes.body
Writing annual reports is sometimes daunting for harried and busy PIs, and NSF's template is a little vague. Maybe some kind of support or tutorial on writing annual reports.