# data[].attributes.body
For Jia Qi slides, Good job on identifying the main fallacy of Amirah statement.

Although a suggest if you could elaborate further on how Amirah statement is a Anecdotal fallacy, so an explanation can be given on what the fallacy is and which statement falls into the category.

# data[].attributes.body
For the 2nd comment made by Ben, I personally disagree with the type of fallacy you associated with it. Slippery slope is linking various events together towards a final cause, which isn't what Ben is doing here.
Ben is simply stating similar facts, that social media is "fake" when it comes to their advertising and news.

Besides that, I agree with the rest of the points brought up. Ben need to make more logical statements backed up by evidence and have a better conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
Amirah's slides can be improved with an addition/ elaboration of each point making it more detailed but not overly complicated, such as adding on to how the conclusion she made or which points she made may be the cause of the fallacy.
It was also very straight to the point and accurate.

# data[].attributes.body
For Saricha slides, she found out the problem of the fallacy on ben comment which is circular reasoning fallacy. She also present clear and informative reasons about why ben statement does not support ben claim. I think saricha can give more improvements on how ben can improve his statement. Only problem is that maybe you can try to write in point form and not look so long winded, but overall is still good and clear. GOOD JOB! I like your slides :)

# data[].attributes.body
Amirahs second statement does not need the improvement bit bcause we only need to analyze her comment not how she  can improve her lifestyle

# data[].attributes.body
Ben's statement
I feel like the majority of the statement focused on what Ben could have done better and the different points and critiques were very well-versed. Ben's flaws were clearly pointed out and every statement was backed up by concrete evidence. The fallacy was on point as well. Well done! However, I didn't really like how the slides were presented and they could have been done in a clearer way. Other than that, everything was okay.

# data[].attributes.body
For Sita's statement in slide 5, the presenter gave good valid point and answered the problems clearly which gave me a better understanding of Sita comment.
However, the points for the part where (why does it not work )  could be back up more with reliable statements and information to make it a more concreate evidence then just saying how you think it in your way as not everyone will have the same opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
For Amirah's first statement I noticed that you found the correct fallacy which is Anecdotal fallacy as in Amirah's comment there wasn't any evidence and facts but based on her own experience. In the slides I can tell that it is very well done with lots of information and explanation on the type of fallacy and why you chose it for this comment. You even went the extra mile and gave ways Amirah can do to make her argument in her comment better.
One thing I noticed that you could improve on is the format of the slides as the slide is packed with words which makes it very hard to read and follow when you are talking.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally disagree with the type of fallacy you associated with it because i feel that the anecdoctal fallacy is more relevant because Sita used more of her own individual experience . A suggestion i have is that you could explain more and give more examples on why you feel like it is the circular reasoning fallacy. Additionally , i feel that you could try to suggest more on what Sita could do to improve her statement .