# data[].attributes.body
Love that all of these strategies are way to build love for each other in the network!

# data[].attributes.headline
How will you know if theses Goals are achieved? Should the goal be more SMART?

# data[].attributes.subject
How will you know if theses Goals are achieved? Should the goal be more SMART?

# data[].attributes.body
Shift and share power with whom specifically?

# data[].attributes.body
These are all really on point. Offering additional convening opportunities would be a really valuable evolution.

# data[].attributes.headline
Strategy 2.2: Create spaces for difficult conversations in service of action. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Strategy 2.2: Create spaces for difficult conversations in service of action. 

# data[].attributes.headline
These all feel so important and meet movement/network needs.

# data[].attributes.subject
These all feel so important and meet movement/network needs.

# data[].attributes.headline
Always love collaborative participatory process

# data[].attributes.subject
Always love collaborative participatory process

# data[].attributes.body
Should be mass movement not mobilization, which speaks to a single moment in time that we mobilize for. We need deeper organizing than that

# data[].attributes.body
Wondering if a bit more on external impact is useful or appropiate here (or maybe elsewhere?). What are we aligning towards?

# data[].attributes.headline
Forging the path towards mass mobilization really resonates with me!

# data[].attributes.subject
Forging the path towards mass mobilization really resonates with me!

# data[].attributes.headline
We need to add the TIA work that is also being used to facilitate these conversations.  Can we add that please

# data[].attributes.subject
We need to add the TIA work that is also being used to facilitate these conversations.  Can we add that please

# data[].attributes.body
2.3) Could someone say more about what the thinking is here? My sense is that USCAN has a big role to play in advancing anti-colonialism toward climate justice and as the US node of CANI we could be bringing a sharper focus.

# data[].attributes.headline
How will you measure increases in trust? 

# data[].attributes.subject
How will you measure increases in trust? 

# data[].attributes.headline
How dealing with lack of alignment will be reflected?

# data[].attributes.subject
How dealing with lack of alignment will be reflected?

# data[].attributes.body
1:4

# data[].attributes.headline
Appreciate creating space for difficult conversations.

# data[].attributes.subject
Appreciate creating space for difficult conversations.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that USCAN is well positioned to embark on this courageous and compassionate effort, which I think is critical to meet this current moment.

# data[].attributes.body
2:3

# data[].attributes.body
Is there anything new in this area from the previous/current strategic plan?

# data[].attributes.headline
Agreed. Trust, connectivity and relationship building is foundation of the rest of the goals.

# data[].attributes.subject
Agreed. Trust, connectivity and relationship building is foundation of the rest of the goals.

# data[].attributes.headline
May need to specify, what kind of expansion of membership requirements, and how do we know when it's needed. More detail would help with clarity.

# data[].attributes.subject
May need to specify, what kind of expansion of membership requirements, and how do we know when it's needed. More detail would help with clarity.

# data[].attributes.headline
Are there additional ways that membership can be monitored.  Surveys tend to get very little response.

# data[].attributes.subject
Are there additional ways that membership can be monitored.  Surveys tend to get very little response.

# data[].attributes.body
link to goal 1:4

# data[].attributes.body
This just feels like a fairly bureaucratic way of cultivating community engagement ... which is kind of the opposite of what motivates community engagement.

# data[].attributes.headline
Strategy 3.3: Continue to conduct member surveys to understand the network and progress toward this strategic plan.......What are other ways that we can use to get feedback? Video, Roundtables, etc

# data[].attributes.subject
Strategy 3.3: Continue to conduct member surveys to understand the network and progress toward this strategic plan.......What are other ways that we can use to get feedback? Video, Roundtables, etc

# data[].attributes.headline
We need 3.2 multiple avenues of member engagement. 

# data[].attributes.subject
We need 3.2 multiple avenues of member engagement. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Member requirement to participate in action teams can be tough because the team focuses might not line up with member organization's priorities year to year

# data[].attributes.subject
Member requirement to participate in action teams can be tough because the team focuses might not line up with member organization's priorities year to year

# data[].attributes.headline
Are action teams the best way to coordinate?

# data[].attributes.subject
Are action teams the best way to coordinate?

# data[].attributes.headline
Shared learning between Arm in Arm and USCAN is a wonderful idea!

# data[].attributes.subject
Shared learning between Arm in Arm and USCAN is a wonderful idea!

# data[].attributes.headline
TIA also needs to be added in this space as TIA is a practice upon which USCAN is incorporating in the infrastructure and practices across teams and internally

# data[].attributes.subject
TIA also needs to be added in this space as TIA is a practice upon which USCAN is incorporating in the infrastructure and practices across teams and internally

# data[].attributes.headline
How the work of the working groups is being reflected?

# data[].attributes.subject
How the work of the working groups is being reflected?

# data[].attributes.headline
What are the best ways to share information and what type of information should be in here

# data[].attributes.subject
What are the best ways to share information and what type of information should be in here

# data[].attributes.headline
Strategy 4.5 - would it be helpful to include a focus on implementation for USCAN's infrastructure and processes? To make sure these commitments are being achieved.

# data[].attributes.subject
Strategy 4.5 - would it be helpful to include a focus on implementation for USCAN's infrastructure and processes? To make sure these commitments are being achieved.

# data[].attributes.body
4.3 -- this would be great to do on an outward-facing basis, with a goal of opening up new and greater funding opportunities.

# data[].attributes.headline
I was on the original VECA transportation team, and represent USCAN on the Clean Vehicles Coalition. I tried to engage USCAN mmebers on comments to EPA regarding GHG standards for motor vehicles, but received no response. Is that effort to engage USCAN members in the EPA rulemaking process still of interest?

# data[].attributes.subject
I was on the original VECA transportation team, and represent USCAN on the Clean Vehicles Coalition. I tried to engage USCAN mmebers on comments to EPA regarding GHG standards for motor vehicles, but received no response. Is that effort to engage USCAN members in the EPA rulemaking process still of interest?

# data[].attributes.body
I also want to understand the prominence of Arm in Arm and the intense focus. I didn’t join for participation in disruptive direct actions

# data[].attributes.headline
Sometimes USCAN action team goals or strategies are so specific that it's difficult to find a way to participate (i.e. specifically fossil fuel tax breaks/subsidies, rather than other aspects of fighting fossil fuels, or framing work around VECA presumes organizational endorsement of the VECA platform). I understand the value in specificity because it focuses work more deeply. But more opportunities to participate in more general forums would be good too, perhaps.

# data[].attributes.subject
Sometimes USCAN action team goals or strategies are so specific that it's difficult to find a way to participate (i.e. specifically fossil fuel tax breaks/subsidies, rather than other aspects of fighting fossil fuels, or framing work around VECA presumes organizational endorsement of the VECA platform). I understand the value in specificity because it focuses work more deeply. But more opportunities to participate in more general forums would be good too, perhaps.