# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huang was a good and a bad ruler at the same time.At the same time I think he was a good ruler because he even built the longest wall in history to protect his dynasty,but the people he chose were not that excited to help.I also think he was a bad ruler because he would kill them for not bringing their school books to get burned.

# data[].attributes.body
He was a band ruler because you need to take care of your people and you have to be a nicer ruler.

# data[].attributes.body
No, I do not think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler because he had harsh punishments and he would kill people with no good reason. For example he would kill people because they wouldn't give him books. This meant that he would punish people for no reason.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler for his dynasty but also harsh, I believe this because he built the longest wall in history to protect his dynasty, but people he chose had no choice, they had to do it. The Videos state that He was harsh but also protected his dynasty. Which means he did know how to survive and keep his dynasty thriving but he was harsh.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was and was not a good ruler. Ithink that was a good ruler because he did many good things for china. For example, he built more of the great wall of china ,and the reason why i also think that he is bad ruler is because he burned books and whoever lost there book would die so. I think that Shi huangdi was a harsh and was a okay man with the society.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi wasn’t a good leader because he made people work when they didn’t volunteer. When he was making the wall he needed help but instead of getting help he made people work for him.Then some those people died building the wall.

# data[].attributes.headline
Leila Perez                                        I think shi Huangdi was a good rule even when he had harsh punishment. I think this because he wanted to protect his country from invasion. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Leila Perez                                        I think shi Huangdi was a good rule even when he had harsh punishment. I think this because he wanted to protect his country from invasion. 

# data[].attributes.body
Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler because he made people work for him non-voluntary most people suffered while making the Great Wall of China they died because of hunger, because they are exhausted some people say that people died in the Great Wall of China.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler.  I think this because he had strict rules and harsh punishments.  Shi Huangdi also, treated his people badly.  As you can see I think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a  horrible ruler because he had strict ruler and he didn’t  listen to his people. He also had strict punishments. It’s states,”  He  claimed all the power and did not share it with the lords. He even took land away from them and forced thousands of nobles to move with their families to the capital so he could keep an eye on them. He also … For example Shi  Huangdi  didn’t even try to pay attention on his people .

# data[].attributes.body
I do not think he was a good ruler because he was a very harsh person. For example he burned peoples books, so whoever didn’t return their books to burn, he would kill and also when they were building the wall he did not give his people a break and they died. Because of this he is a bad ruler because he killed many of his people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think shi huangdi is a bad  ruler. One reason  he made the people build the wall. For example, if the people didn't want they had to no matter what.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion I think he ruled a bad. He ruled bad because he forced poor  people to work on the wall. While they were building the wall some of them lost their lives. After he got overthrown they continued force people to expand the wall, and I think that he influenced them. His people didn’t respect him and he was harsh on them

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi wasn’t a good ruler because of the rules and demands he gave his people. For example, he would kill them if they didn’t bring their school books or didn’t obey him. He randomly chose workers for the Great Wall of China and treated them like peasants. Majority of them died from starvation,exhaustion, and accidents. He overworked his society and threatened them. Overall, Shi Huangdi was a selfish and harsh ruler.

# data[].attributes.body
There were lot’s of great things that Shi Huangdi did for China.One good thing he did is build a wall to keep invaders out.This helped many people in many ways.One way is that it keeps them safe.

There were lot’s of great things that Shi Huangdi did for China.One good thing he did is build a wall to keep invaders out.This helped many people in many ways.One way is that it keeps them safe.

# data[].attributes.body
Shi Huangdi was not a good ruler. In the text it states, “Those scholars who did not bring their books to be burned were killed….., and many died of accidents of hunger.”This shows that he had strict, and harsh laws.

# data[].attributes.body
think he ruled a bad. He ruled bad because he forced poor  people to work on the wall. While they were building the wall some of them lost their lives. After he got overthrown they continued force people to expand the wall, and I think that he influenced them. His people didn’t respect him and he was harsh on them.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler because he burn 460 scholars. Another reason was because he killed a lot of poor people. Finally my last reason is took land away and forced them to move with their families.

# data[].attributes.body
What I think that Shi Huangdi was a terrible ruler because he did a lot of greedy things. Shi Huangdi made the poor people the great wall of china also for a punishment you would have to help build the wall. During Shi Huangdi made people build the wall a lot of people died and dug near the wall.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler because he kill a lot of his people. First he burned 460 scholars alive because they were against the burning of the book. Also he didn't give he’s people a lot of freedom he made them go by he’s rules.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think Shi Huangdi was not a good ruler. For example, he said that if they didn’t burn their books they would get killed and he chose people involuntarily to build the Great Wall of China and many people died of accidents, exhaustion, and hunger. This shows that Shi Huangdi had harsh and strict rules.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Shi Huangdi was not a good ruler. For example, he said that if they didn’t burn their books they would get killed and he chose people involuntarily to build the Great Wall of China and many people died of accidents, exhaustion, and hunger. This shows that Shi Huangdi had harsh and strict rules.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler because he kill a lot of his people. First Shi Huangdi burned 460 schools alive because they were against the burning of the book. Puls Shi Huangdi also took land away and forced them to move with their families.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler. One reason is because he built a wall.  For example, he built a wall to keep the invaders out and keep the people and country safe .

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler because he had bad really strict punishments.

# data[].attributes.body
No, I do not think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler because he had harsh punishments and he would kill people with no good reason. For example he would kill people because they wouldn't give him books. This meant that he would punish people for no reason.

# data[].attributes.body
No, I don't think he is a bad ruler because he has harsh punishments, and  Made people built on the wall forever. He is a bad ruler because he had harsh punishments because people that are being bad gets bad punishments and it will hurts a lot the punishments. Second reason he is a bad ruler is that he did not give the people a break while on the great wall they worked so hard and they did not get a break and a lot of people died by that. In conclusion this is why shi huangdi is a bad ruler.

# data[].attributes.headline
He was not a good ruler. He had a lot of laws. So the people can not do the majority of things that other dynasty could do. 

# data[].attributes.subject
He was not a good ruler. He had a lot of laws. So the people can not do the majority of things that other dynasty could do. 

# data[].attributes.body
Shi Huangdi was a good ruler although he was a tyrant he made many achievements. For example he was the first emperor to unify China, “The first ruler to unify all of China… ”. He made many achievements but this was the first of many

# data[].attributes.body
Shi Huangdi was a tyrant because he was selfish and wanted history to start with his rule so he did many bad things so many people hated his policies. He was a selfish person, the article said, “He also ordered that most of existing books be burned. He wanted history to begin with his rule and the Qin dynasty. Those scholars who did not bring their books to be burned were killed.”. He was a very selfish man to want to be the first ruler when there were many before him so with his childish actions and power he burnt mostly all the existing books.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was not a good ruler because he forced peasants and other people to build the Great Wall and they would often die building it.

# data[].attributes.body
Shi Huangdi was a good ruler although he was a tyrant he made many achievements. For example he was the first emperor to unify China, “The first ruler to unify all of China… ”. He made many achievements but this was the first of many

# data[].attributes.body
The emperor was bad because he forced innocent peasants to build the Great wall and he killed students if they didn’t bring their books.

# data[].attributes.headline
Emperor was not a good emperor because He burned books because he wanted start again. However He would kill schaler that did not bring their books.He would force people to build the wall.

# data[].attributes.subject
Emperor was not a good emperor because He burned books because he wanted start again. However He would kill schaler that did not bring their books.He would force people to build the wall.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler even though he did many things he treated people harshly. He wanted everything how he wanted and even wanted history to start with his dynasty. He never respected peoples ideas and if they didn't do what he wanted he would kill them. For example, he told scholars to burn all the history book because he wanted history to begin with his dynasty and not somebody else's dynasty and if they didn't burn the books he would kill them.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler even though he did many things he treated people harshly. He wanted everything how he wanted and even wanted history to start with his dynasty. He never respected peoples ideas and if they didn't do what he wanted he would kill them. For example, he told scholars to burn all the history book because he wanted history to begin with his dynasty and not somebody else's dynasty and if they didn't burn the books he would kill them.

# data[].attributes.headline
No I think Shi Huangdi was not a good because he made people work on a 3700 mile wall this is not good because the workers are mad and sad that they left their families to work on the wall and the family of those workers would be mad that their husband die.

# data[].attributes.subject
No I think Shi Huangdi was not a good because he made people work on a 3700 mile wall this is not good because the workers are mad and sad that they left their families to work on the wall and the family of those workers would be mad that their husband die.

# data[].attributes.body
Emperor was not a good emperor because He burned books because he wanted start again. However He would kill schaler that did not bring their books.He would force people to build the wall.

# data[].attributes.headline
Do you think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler?

# data[].attributes.subject
Do you think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler?

# data[].attributes.body
No I think Shi Huangdi was not a good because he made people work on a 3700 mile wall this is not good because the workers are mad and sad that they left their families to work on the wall and the family of those workers would be mad that their husband die.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler because he made the 7 major states turn to one, he improved currency, he made transportation fast and easy. First, Shi Huangdi was a good leader because he a strong leader because he turned the 7 major states into 1 which is modern day China. It states on page 194 which states “One state, the Qin built a strong army that defeated the armies of the rivaling states”. Second, he’s a good ruler because he made only one type of currency. It says on page 196 “Standardized gold and copper coins became the currency used in all China”. Lastly, he was one of the best rulers in China because he made China transportation better. On chapter 7 section 3 stated “Each of these new roads was the same width, 50 paces wide. This design helped the army move quickly and easily to put down revolts in distant areas”. In conclusion Shi Huangdi was probably one of the best  leaders in China because he turn China into one, made only one currency, and made their transportation better at that time.  

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler because he made the 7 major states turn to one, he improved currency, he made transportation fast and easy. First, Shi Huangdi was a good leader because he a strong leader because he turned the 7 major states into 1 which is modern day China. It states on page 194 which states “One state, the Qin built a strong army that defeated the armies of the rivaling states”. Second, he’s a good ruler because he made only one type of currency. It says on page 196 “Standardized gold and copper coins became the currency used in all China”. Lastly, he was one of the best rulers in China because he made China transportation better. On chapter 7 section 3 stated “Each of these new roads was the same width, 50 paces wide. This design helped the army move quickly and easily to put down revolts in distant areas”. In conclusion Shi Huangdi was probably one of the best  leaders in China because he turn China into one, made only one currency, and made their transportation better at that time.  

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler because he made the 7 major states turn to one, he improved currency, he made transportation fast and easy. First, Shi Huangdi was a good leader because he a strong leader because he turned the 7 major states into 1 which is modern day China. It states on page 194 which states “One state, the Qin built a strong army that defeated the armies of the rivaling states”. Second, he’s a good ruler because he made only one type of currency. It says on page 196 “Standardized gold and copper coins became the currency used in all China”. Lastly, he was one of the best rulers in China because he made China transportation better. On chapter 7 section 3 stated “Each of these new roads was the same width, 50 paces wide. This design helped the army move quickly and easily to put down revolts in distant areas”. In conclusion Shi Huangdi was probably one of the best  leaders in China because he turn China into one, made only one currency, and made their transportation better at that time.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler. He made the 7 major states to one. He made transportation fast and easy. First Shi Huangdi was a good leader because he turned the 7 major states into 1 which is modern day China. Second, he’s a good ruler because he made only one type of currency. Lastly, he is was a good ruler because he made China transportation better than before . In conclusion Shi Huangdi was probably one of the best leaders in China.

# data[].attributes.body
No I think Shi Huangdi was not a good because he made people work on a 3700 mile wall this is not good because the workers are mad and sad that they left their families to work on the wall and the family of those workers would be mad that their husband die.

# data[].attributes.body
No I think Shi Huangdi was not a good because he made people work on a 3700 mile wall this is not good because the workers are mad and sad that they left their families to work on the wall and the family of those workers would be mad that their husband die.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Shi Huangdi wasn’t a good ruler for different reasons. For example, he made a lot of his people build the wall like peasants, commoners, criminals, and warriors and they have all died in different ways. Shi Huangdi had made great accomplishments but he was too harsh on his people and he was very damandent for things.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler, because he was the one to cause a lot of great advancements in china. He started making the great wall of china, then united china as a whole, and he also made a new currency. For example, the wall prevented lots of raids from neighboring normal people, and the currency made buying/selling stuff a lot easier.

# data[].attributes.body
Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler because he made people work for him non-voluntary most people suffered while making the Great Wall they died because of hunger, because they are exhausted some people say that people died in the Great Wall.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler even though he did many things he treated people harshly. He wanted everything how he wanted and even wanted history to start with his dynasty. He never respected peoples ideas and if they didn't do what he wanted he would kill them. For example, he told scholars to burn all the history book because he wanted history to begin with his dynasty and not somebody else's dynasty and if they didn't burn the books he would kill them.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a harsh ruler along with the other rulers after him. He made his people build the Great Wall and die of hunger,  exhaustion, and labor. A rumor is told that people were buried inside the wall during construction and in a nearby gravesite. He punished people that did not obey his rules. I think Shi Huangdi is not a very good leader. He punished people harshly, he made people die from exhaustion.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler because he did a lot for China. Such as Uniteing  China, becoming the first emperor. He also created the great wall,

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Shi Huangdi wasnt a good ruler because he would give people hash punishment and his people hated his punishments.For example he would burry scholar alive because they wont return their books in time.This explains that he would do stuff people wouldn’t like and made people hate him.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a good ruler because he established things for In the text it states, “. With everyone using the same money and measurements, the economy ran much smoother.” In conclusion, I think he was a good ruler.

# data[].attributes.body
Shi huangdi was a good and bad. Some reasons I think he is good said he made people that i don’t know to built the great wall of china. Some reasons I think he is bad is because he burned books and people need books to read and to know information about it.
-Lindsay Maldonado

# data[].attributes.body
No, I do not think that he was a good ruler because he was selfish and his punishments were harsh. He was selfish because he wanted to have history start with him, so he burned most of the books that came before he was ruler. He had very harsh punishments because if the people who owned these books refused to let him burn them, they would be killed.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a harsh ruler along with the other rulers after him.

# data[].attributes.body
emperor Shi Huangdi did many great things for China.  He unified the country and expanded the empire.  However, he was a harsh ruler and did not always have the respect of his people. that he took people to work for him on his warriors and the great wall involuntarily. So Shi Huangdi was not such a great ruler.

# data[].attributes.body
great wall of china even if they didn't want to and most people died in the construction by accidents hunger. 

# data[].attributes.headline
I think shi huangdi was not a good ruler because he treated his people bad and to much people died he also forced them to build the 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think shi huangdi was not a good ruler because he treated his people bad and to much people died he also forced them to build the 

# data[].attributes.body
great wall of china even if they didn't want to and most people died in the construction by accidents hunger.

# data[].attributes.body
No, Shi Huangdi was a not so great ruler because he is a tyrant because he only cares for him and his family, he doesn't care for other people, he was harsh on the people that didn't obey his commands they would get punished or die. Shi Huangdi also was forcing people like soldiers, commads, peasants, criminals, to "Build the Great Wall of China". The persons who were forced to build the Great Wall of China died when they were to build the Great Wall of China of hunger, exhaustion, and thirst.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was not a good because he was harsh he is a tyrant because he only cares for himself and family, he doesn't care for other people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a harsh ruler along with the other rulers after him. He made his people build the Great Wall and die of hunger,  exhaustion, and labor. A rumor is told that people were buried inside the wall during construction and in a nearby gravesite. He punished people that did not obey his rules. I think Shi Huangdi is not a very good leader. He punished people harshly, he made people die from exhaustion.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a great ruler. I know this because he built roads to help that helped many people. The text states, “These roads made travel easier for everyone..This design helped the army move quickly and easily to put down revolts in distant areas.” this shows that Shi Huangdi built a network road that helped many people.

# data[].attributes.headline
 think shi huangdi was not a good ruler because he treated his people bad and to much people died he also forced them to build the great wall of china even if they didn't want to and most people died in the construction by accidents hunger. 

# data[].attributes.subject
 think shi huangdi was not a good ruler because he treated his people bad and to much people died he also forced them to build the great wall of china even if they didn't want to and most people died in the construction by accidents hunger. 

# data[].attributes.body
Misael duenas

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler. For example he would let you pay your bad behavior but if you got him really mad you would be killed.He as well only cared about himself and was obsessed with himself.

# data[].attributes.body
No, shi huangdi was not a great ruler he was a tyrant which means she only cared for himself,his family and didn’t care for his people if they did not obey his his command they would die or would get punished.He made so many people die when they were building the great wall by hunger,exhaustion,and thirst.He made people work for him and they had no choice or he would kill them.

# data[].attributes.body
Emperor Shi Huangdi did many great things for China.  He unified the country and expanded the empire.  However, he was a harsh ruler and did not always have the respect of his people. In the videos it stated that he took people to work for him on his warriors and the great wall involuntarily. So Shi Huangdi was not such a great ruler.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a great ruler. I know this because he built roads to help that helped many people. The text states, “These roads made travel easier for everyone..This design helped the army move quickly and easily to put down revolts in distant areas.” this shows that Shi Huangdi built a network road that helped many people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi huangdi wasn’t a good ruler because he would give people harsh punishment and people hated his policies. My evidence is, “Shi Huangdi unified China, but was a harsh ruler. Peasants, scholars, and nobles hated his policies. This explains that Shi huangdi didnt respect people very much that he made people hate him of how he ruled the Qin dynasty and treated people

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a bad leader because he would kill his people of books and he would also burn all books. Another reason why the ruler is a bad ruler is because he fought for power and power only even among his people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a good ruler because he built the Great wall of china and he made army to defeat invaders.

# data[].attributes.body
Shi Huangdi was not a good ruler because he was harsh to his people.For example it states,” That many people died of hunger, exhaustion, and accidents on building the Great wall. Shi Huangdi forced people to build the wall.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was not an good ruler because he was really harsh to his people. For example, many people died of hunger, exhaustion, and accidents on building the Great wall. People died on building the Great wall because of Shi Huangdi was being harsh to them.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion Shi Huangdi was a good ruler. I think he was a good ruler because he expanded and unified the empire. In the text it states, “He unified the country and expanded the empire.” Although he was a harsh ruler he did lead China to many successes as to building the great wall.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was not a good ruler because he forced people to make him stuff. Another reason Shi Huangdi is not a good ruler it that he told his older brother to kill himself for him to become king . last reason Shi Huangdi is not a good ruler he killed himself  by drinking mercury because he thought he can be immortal.

# data[].attributes.body
He was a good ruler because he was harsh but he kept his people safe.

# data[].attributes.body
NO. I don’t think he’s a great ruler because he forced people to make him a wall which killed many people and he was harsh and mean to the people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a good ruler because he kept everybody safe but he was very harsh.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Shi Huangdi was a good ruler. For example, he built roads to travel to and from places and he biult canals for the cities won’t get flooded. Another example, is Shi Huangdi gave China a money system they can use to run things much smoother. My last example, is Shi Huangdi had the idea to build the Great Wall of China as a barrier to protect them from invaders.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler even though he was harsh and mean. Shi Huangdi was a good ruler because he built the Great Wall so that his people would be safe from invaders. In the textbook it states,” The first section of the wall was had been built in the 600s BC to keep invading groups out of China.” (pg 97) Shi Huangdi was a harsh ruler but a good ruler he built things for his people to try to save them so that is why I think Shi Huangdi was a good but harsh ruler.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler.For example,he did rule over all of the states in china and he also united china,he made a great defense against invaders.It states in the website”Once he had complete control of the state of Qin, King Zheng set out to conquer the other six Chinese states.He also began the building of the Great Wall of China. He had many of the existing walls throughout the country connected to form a long wall that would protect China from the invaders to the north.”.He united all of china by conquering one by one and when he finished he conquered all of china.

# data[].attributes.body
the l dont to warere good and wrong person.

# data[].attributes.body
I do think that Shi Huangdi was a good ruler because he wanted protection for his people and he made the group system.

# data[].attributes.body
Shi Huangdi is a good ruler because he unified the country/China and expanded the empire,and he was a harsh ruler and didn’t get the respect from his people he gave them their punishments because they are not graceful at all of all his work he did to make China a better place to live.However i think he is not a good ruler because  it states,”Workers faced years of hardship,danger,and often,death. He even took land away from them and forced thousands of nobles to move with their families.”It really seems he liked his people to be treated sadly which i think all the king's did that except for the ones how do honor them.I still know that Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler to his people because he will involve their families to move one place to another so he could have peace around him sometimes . Shi Huangdi would probably change his families laws and also i forgot he killed 460 kids because they didn't bring their book with them to their classes.

# data[].attributes.body
I do believe Shi Huangdi was a good ruler . In the book it states “Shi Huangdi also wanted to protect  the country from invision.”  Shi Huangdi built irrigation systems to make more food for farming. Shi Huangdi might be harsh and might not have respect for his people but he did do a lot during his rein.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion i think that Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler. The reason why i think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler was because in the the video stated that his people died in the wall from hunger accidents and exhaustion

# data[].attributes.body
I  think Shi Huangdi was a good ruler because of how strict and certain he was about his empire. Shi Huangdi had reinforced the government and economy, he had also established certain writing and started construction that made travel easier. Of course, he was harsh but his ruling had lasted for a very long time.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think he was a good ruler because he was harsh to his people he put people like warriors to work in vollterly

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler. He was a bad ruler because he was unfair to others. Also he made people build the wall for him and people died from being hungry.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a bad and very unfair ruler because he would have people build the wall for him and most of them died from hunger and exhaustion.

# data[].attributes.body
Shi huangdi was a tyrant and hursh ruler. but at the end of his life a new period has just started and civil wars.

# data[].attributes.body
He was a bad ruler because he would burn books of their history and if one person kept it tey wouldd be killed.

# data[].attributes.body
He was not a good ruler because he killed people just because they kept their book and i think that was wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Shi Huangdi was a good ruler.  In the article of Emperor of Qin Shi Huang it states, “Emperor Qin also unified China by establishing a common currency (money) and standard units of measure. With everyone using the same money and measurements, the economy ran much smoother”.   I think this because he made money, writing, and many more helpful things.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not think Shi Huangdi was a great ruler because he did harsh things. For example he burned the scholars books because he wanted history to begin with his rule. He also had harsh laws.

# data[].attributes.body
Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler for example he would leave the people who worked for the wall starve and when he was burning most of chinese books and if you didn't bring the books he would kill you. The text states ”Those scholars who did not bring their books to be burned were killed.” This shows that he was not a good ruler.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Shi Huangdi was a bad ruler. For example, when he had people build the wall for him they often died because of starvation and exhaustion. He could have gave them breaks but, the got too tired, they got hungry ,and died for either one of those things.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Shi Huangdi is not a good leader because he killed many people for nothing and he wanted everything (greedy) to start with him so he burned all the others books that did have him the books he burned. Even he made people build the Great Wall and made people sick or ill and die. People say the workers that build the Wall have bones in them from the workers.