# data[].attributes.headline
The questions coming from the defending team should have been more accurate when relating to history.

# data[].attributes.subject
The questions coming from the defending team should have been more accurate when relating to history.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think Ben played Aristotle's role perfectly and answered the questions in detail.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Ben played Aristotle's role perfectly and answered the questions in detail.

# data[].attributes.headline
I could have looked to the audience more.

# data[].attributes.subject
I could have looked to the audience more.

# data[].attributes.body
Parth did a good job with asking questions that helped the prosecution with evidence

# data[].attributes.body
Answers that the character would feel is right and including more personal experiences than information that anyone could include

# data[].attributes.headline
I love the way Alex organized and expressed his thoughts and acted as the Ghost of Caesar. He should try out forthe play next year.

# data[].attributes.subject
I love the way Alex organized and expressed his thoughts and acted as the Ghost of Caesar. He should try out forthe play next year.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the questions we asked very creative. I think that I could have talked louder, and I could have been more prepared. I do wish that I could have objected though.

# data[].attributes.body
Though I had some questions for the witnesses prepared, I was able to make up some more questions along the way that I thought were relatively strong.

# data[].attributes.body
I could have acted upset about being dead instead of being fine with it.

# data[].attributes.body
Aidan spoke loud enough for everyone to hear -Tarun

# data[].attributes.body
Aidan and Shruti had good comebacks, but they should've been more as questions than statements.

# data[].attributes.body
I should have made more eye contact with the audience and use better word choice.

# data[].attributes.body
I could have made more eye contact during my statement, instead of reading directly of my chromebook.

# data[].attributes.body
Soothsayer did a really good job portraying the character and what the character would think. They answered the questions well and made me believe they felt like they were treated the same way.

# data[].attributes.body
BUT... I think Sarah F. did really good by relating her topic to Julius Caesar. I think that what I did good with my choice of vocabulary which strongly supported my argument.

# data[].attributes.body
I think I paced myself, and I think my crying and sniffling was a good touch.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Sarah F did a good job in the tone in which she read her witness statement.

# data[].attributes.body
the soothsayer was well prepared with responses to the defendant's questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Shruti had nice comebacks

# data[].attributes.body
I think I need to improve on pronouncing Philosopher.

# data[].attributes.body
I could have thought of something more convincing when the defenders asked me their questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Guiding the witnesses by making a correct statement followed by "correct?" to admitting that they are wrong and guilty of doing something wrong

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Aidan, I have one piece of advice for you. Please get to the question and not have too many statements when asking questions so people can understand what you are trying to say.

# data[].attributes.headline
Shruti did great!!! :) She gave specific questions that made the prosecution side think.

# data[].attributes.subject
Shruti did great!!! :) She gave specific questions that made the prosecution side think.

# data[].attributes.body
I did not go today but someone who I thought did well was Shruti. She was prepared with questions to ask the witnesses. The questions made the witnesses think about their character and what they would do if put in the situation.

# data[].attributes.body
I could have talked louder or looked up from my chromebook more.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that our questions were very good

# data[].attributes.body
I liked how the second question on the defense side usually went off of the response of the first question which made it so that the second question challenged the first question's response.

# data[].attributes.body
Comment with one of the following:

Your personal strength in today's trial (Be specific. Don't just write "acting like my part" or "reading my witness statement"

What do you think you could have improved on?

Highlight something someone else did well (Don't just write: Shout out to Shruti, who nailed it just like she is Michelle Obama!)

# data[].attributes.body
My vocabulary and ability to stay in character while responding to the defense was pretty good. I need to improve in my ability to understand complicated questions without correct facts. I think that the prosecutors and defense attorneys did a good job of acting as attorneys but their questions should be more definitive in the sense not proving character but the facts of what happened. Less statements more questions.

# data[].attributes.headline
Aidan did a good job leading up to his question.

# data[].attributes.subject
Aidan did a good job leading up to his question.

# data[].attributes.body
-Spencer C