# data[].attributes.headline
source 1 was a lot more information based on the ingredence  

# data[].attributes.subject
source 1 was a lot more information based on the ingredence  

# data[].attributes.body
coffee> energy drinks

# data[].attributes.body
Looking at each article in black and white, Source 2 is more credible than that of Source 1 due to the lack of detail and proper presentation of facts. Although Source 1 is not wrong on its claims.

# data[].attributes.body
It was set up in a professional manor, it had credible sources and had tons of information.

# data[].attributes.body
The statements are supported by facts and studies

# data[].attributes.headline
source 2 was more informative and used a database 

# data[].attributes.subject
source 2 was more informative and used a database 

# data[].attributes.headline
Source 2 was more credible to me. There was history involved and many references to support information.

# data[].attributes.subject
Source 2 was more credible to me. There was history involved and many references to support information.

# data[].attributes.body
It does not go into detail about what is in energy drinks

# data[].attributes.body
Source 2 is more credible because it provides a substantial amount of information on the topic. Source 1 was more of a fun facts page.

# data[].attributes.body
Source 2 is written by someone with a PhD.

Clinical trials have been done for source 2.

# data[].attributes.headline
Source 2 seems more credible. Its based on a study & its been worked on by professionals (PhD, MA, MD)

# data[].attributes.subject
Source 2 seems more credible. Its based on a study & its been worked on by professionals (PhD, MA, MD)

# data[].attributes.body
They give credit to their facts.

# data[].attributes.body
more credible and academically sound

# data[].attributes.headline
The first source was produced by a trade organization, which could mean it has a persuasive agenda. No credit to any particular author was obvious.

# data[].attributes.subject
The first source was produced by a trade organization, which could mean it has a persuasive agenda. No credit to any particular author was obvious.

# data[].attributes.body
The second was an article in an academic journal with a credited author. The article was detailed and written professionally. Furthermore, as a research article, it would be more reliable as content to cite than the first.

# data[].attributes.headline
Source 2 by far research data not biased 

# data[].attributes.subject
Source 2 by far research data not biased 

# data[].attributes.headline
Source 2 was the more informative and credible of the two. Source one is an energy drink  company looking to get you to buy into their product. Source two has actual research behind it .

# data[].attributes.subject
Source 2 was the more informative and credible of the two. Source one is an energy drink  company looking to get you to buy into their product. Source two has actual research behind it .

# data[].attributes.headline
Definitely source 2 it has credible sources listed on ever page. Also source two has links leading back to where the author found this credible information and page numbers.  

# data[].attributes.subject
Definitely source 2 it has credible sources listed on ever page. Also source two has links leading back to where the author found this credible information and page numbers.  

# data[].attributes.body
Source one only had flashy pictures that would be suitable for a 3rd grade presentation but not for college level

# data[].attributes.body
Sour

# data[].attributes.body
Source 2 for sure is the more credible option. There is also more information, and it is much more specific then the first source

# data[].attributes.body
its from a database

# data[].attributes.body
It is from a data base and it has an author who wrote it and a date that it was published.

# data[].attributes.body
Energy Drinks Europe, Top 10 Facts Page
http://www.energydrinkseurope.org/facts/

# data[].attributes.body
The Benefits & Risks of Energy Drinks in Young Adults and Military Service Members
https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.hacc.edu/central/docview/1917823506/fulltextPDF/6736D5750129478EPQ/1?accountid=11302