# data[].attributes.body
I think the author leaves the punishment up to the readers imagination so that you can imagine how badly beaten Pavel was. It makes you think of all the possibilities more than reading it.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author purposely left out Pavel´s punishment to show how brutal and horrifying it was.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe is to leave to the readers mind on how brutal this Kurt does to someone he hates cause sometimes its more brutal if the reader thinks about it.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the author left out Pavel's punishment because he wants us to infer what happened. We are supposed to infer what happened using the whole families' reactions, especially Bruno and Gretels. Another reason why the author didn't directly state what happened could be because it was to graphic and intense for young audiences to handle.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the Author leaves out the part where Kotler does something to Pavel so that the readers can use their imagination. Maybe the author wants the reader to infer what happened to Pavel because of Shmuel's thoughts on Kotler.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author left it out so the reader can choose to imagine the horrific details or not.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the author left that part out because it was probably pretty gruesome to hear details about. Using our imagination, we can depict based off the feelings of Gretel and Bruno that it was a pretty horrific event that took place.

# data[].attributes.body
The author may have left it out because it could be very graphic to describe he left it up to the reader to imagine to their comfort level.

# data[].attributes.body
It could to graphic, or upsetting to write or read about, and leaving it up to the imagination allows for it to be however graphic you would like.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that he leaves it up to the reader because he wants use to imagine it because everyone will think of it differently.

# data[].attributes.body
Might have been to bad to write about or say.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author leaves it to our imagination because we can pieace all the things we know about Lieutenant and Pavel and we can imagine what had happened in our own ways.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it was to leave it up to our imagination. For us to evaluate how evil we think Kotler is. To go over Kotler's past actions for us to imagine how brutal he was. I think this was to make the experience stick with us more. If the author just told us it would leave our mind a lot faster. Instead we ponder and imagine what happened to Pavel. Making it a lot more impactful.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author lets us imagine how the punishment went because we are the ones reading it so I feel like everyone reading it is going to have a different way they feel about it and how they imagine the punishment.
Christian T

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the author leaves what happens to Pavel to the reader's imagination because then the reader can decide for themselves how bad it was. The reader could be many different ages, so this lets it only be as harsh as what the reader wants to imagine. Sam A

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author left it up to the readers imagination because not only would it have been terrible it also uses it as a literary device to keep you reading more and to show how terrible the Nazi's punishments were for small mistakes. -Talon R.

# data[].attributes.body
The author does this to keep the readers imagination going. The author doesn't explain exactly what the punishment was but also makes it seem like it was harsh so that the reader can make up what they thought happen in their mind. Jonathan D.

# data[].attributes.body
This allows the reader to use imagination and knowledge to fill in the blank. We know how much Nazis hate Jews and we know what they'll do to them. Also no description is specific enough to describe the punishment. Its up to the reader to determine how much discipline was put into it.
~Brynlee E

# data[].attributes.body
If the author would have explained what happened to Pavel, then it would just be that—a simple explanation. Instead, the author is allowing us to use our current knowledge along with Bruno's reaction to what happened to come up with our own interpretation of the event. Allowing the reader to use context clues and their imagination encourages the reader to pay more attention to the small details and even the lack of details.
- Dejah-Jade R.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author does this because they want us to make it ourselves because they think we can make it more out there and get our attention more.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the author leaves it to use to imagine because we can imagine something far worse than they can describe. If they had described it we would know what he did. However by not saying what he did and just telling us the reactions makes us think he did something unspeakable. So thus we can possibly imagine something far worse than they can describe.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the author left it to the reader's imagination to decide what happened to Pavel because I think our imaginations can make some scenarios more powerful and from everyone's expressions, it's not hard to understand how Pavel was treated after spilling the wine.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the author left it to the reader's imagination to decide what happened to Pavel because I think our imaginations can make some scenarios more powerful and from everyone's expressions, it's not hard to understand how Pavel was treated after spilling the wine.

# data[].attributes.body
-Serena F.

# data[].attributes.headline
We see what happens at the mention of Lieutenant Kotler in Shmuel's reactions so we can assume that he is not so nice to anyone even if their kids.

# data[].attributes.subject
We see what happens at the mention of Lieutenant Kotler in Shmuel's reactions so we can assume that he is not so nice to anyone even if their kids.

# data[].attributes.body
Amaya M

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the author leave Pavel’s punishment up to the reader's imagination rather than describing in detail what Lieutenant Kotler does to him because sometimes we can think of knew ways to imagine things.

# data[].attributes.body
We already know how badly the Jews are treated in the camp, so it's not hard to imagine the punishment Lt. Kotler gave Pavel. I think a lot of times it's better to leave things to the reader's imagination because we already have pictures in our mind of what's going on or how characters look and act.

# data[].attributes.body
Submit your response to the following question: Why does the author leave Pavel’s punishment up to the reader's imagination rather than describing in detail what Lieutenant Kotler does to him? & respond to at least one classmate. Please remember that your feedback must be kind and thoughtful as well as constructive. This means I’m looking for more than “This is Great!” Some sentence starters might be: I was impressed by.... OR Did you notice that....... OR What did you mean when you wrote.....