# data[].attributes.body
They’re two different ways a country can respond to foreign crises, one will get more involved when dealing with their problems while the isolation View does not interact unless they are affected.

# data[].attributes.body
I think isolationism is when a country remains out of foreign conflicts. Interventionism is the process when you talk to someone about a bad habit so that might have to do with a country

# data[].attributes.body
It’s the difference between a country secluding themselves from foreign issues or intervening in foreign issues. It reminds me of post WW1 America

# data[].attributes.body
Isolationism is when you isolate yourself.  For example Charles Lindbergh was a big advocate for this after ww two. Intervención is taking action

# data[].attributes.body
The best example to my knowledge of this debate would be the argument over US isolationism preceding world war 2, and it has become a more important topic today than some realize because we encounter similar dilemmas involving countries which house terrorist groups

# data[].attributes.body
To me it is the question of protection. Is help necessary or is it better just to leave be. In these cases the most important part is keeping your own people safe. If that’s possible then it is warranted to help others and create safety and peace nationwide

# data[].attributes.body
Isolationism to me means locking down the borders and only focusing on domestic issues. Maybe working with other countries for trade but that’s about it. Interventionism to me is like the US, we are the self acclaimed world police force. We feel a responsibility to everyone around the world who might need assistance and we will leave our own country to make sure they are helped.

# data[].attributes.body
Isolationism is when you don’t intervene with foreign conflicts and “isolate” yourself from it. Intervention is when the country goes in to another and takes action

# data[].attributes.body
I think of the United States staying isolated in WW1 and avoiding conflict and spending because they had just come out of the Great Depression. It also reminds me of the debate over involvement in Vietnam.

# data[].attributes.body
Interventionism can be impactful in situations where there’s an authoritarian or oppressive government, but sometimes interventionism goes too far and hurts more than it helps.  In Guatemala the US stepped in due to issues with the United Fruit Company & the Guatemalan president at the time, so they ousted him and replaced him with colonel Castillo, this type of intervention delayed progress in Latin American countries.

# data[].attributes.headline
Isolationism to me means the country’s policy keeps them out of conflict and remains to focus on domestic issues while interventionism means a country is more apt to get involved in conflicts and chooses to intervene in international issues

# data[].attributes.subject
Isolationism to me means the country’s policy keeps them out of conflict and remains to focus on domestic issues while interventionism means a country is more apt to get involved in conflicts and chooses to intervene in international issues

# data[].attributes.body
Isolationism refers to distancing yourself (a singular country) from others to avoid foreign consequences. Conversely, interventionism is deliberately involving yourself (a singular country) with foreign affairs.

# data[].attributes.body
Isolationism is the idea that we should worry solely about American problems and only involve ourselves in foreign conflicts when absolutely necessary to America. Interventionism is the idea that if there is an issue some where in the world it’s our responsibility to fix it during almost any circumstance.

# data[].attributes.body
isolationism makes me think of a country’s attempt to refrain from being involved with foreign conflicts (the united states practiced this at the beginning of WW1)

# data[].attributes.body
When I think of isolationism vs interventionism I first think of the Cold War and conflicts between going into foreign countries to establish either communism or capitalism for personal benefit in fear of the domino effect. I also think of Vietnam and the time when intervention was a complete failure for the US.