# data[].attributes.body
We don’t concur with the opinion that Coke and Pepsi join hands with the condom distribution program because their field is in F&B and we can not find the connection between drink and condoms. Instead, they can donate money to the HIV/AIDS prevention program to show their social responsibility.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I think it is a great idea, because Pepsi and Coke are large corporations that can let people know while drinking their coke or Pepsi.

# data[].attributes.body
We agree on the approaches described in Indian because they had the distribution of condoms on the barbers, the people who are trusted by the man going there to have their hair cut, to give advise on safe sex through condoms. But the idea of persuading people to have sex like in the carnival in Brazil shows the whole difference in culture, showing its inappropriation in approaching the US culture.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the Brazilian government’s strategies are good because they are allowing the prevention of contract AIDS because they are getting closer to a big part of Brazilian people that could be at high risk of contracting or that are already infected with the incurable ailment; however, it's necessary that the government makes another strategy for an attack in an effective way. That’s why I think it is necessary to make programs of sexual education for all the Brazilian population especially in the poor sector and the youth, which are the most vulnerable ones.
Unlike the Brazilian strategies, the Indian government is making a good campaign according to their culture and religious beliefs. It would be a very good strategy to look at the open-minded cities to bring them AIDS education from high schools to universities and the rest of the society and in this way start to create a responsible consciousness about sexually transmitted diseases.

# data[].attributes.body
Our group believes it is a good idea for Coke and Pepsi to participate in a condom distribution program in India, Brazil, and the United States. Coke and Pepsi are two well world-known brands with significant brand power and influence. This influence could be a good ally in terms of publicity to help promote the use of condoms and consequently the revelation of AIDS in these targeted countries. However, Both companies should consider performing some serious research on how this topic is approached in both countries and see what has worked previously before taking any concrete steps and compromising their image in this particular touchy subject.

# data[].attributes.body
In terms of religion, people in India strongly believe in gods and the use of condoms to prevent conception is unacceptable. But in the US, people take it for granted that it has nothing to do with their faith or beliefs. And as for medical fields, U.S. medicine is thriving, so it's a rapid way to inhibit the development of HIV/AIDS, whereas India and Brazil face patent restrictions.

# data[].attributes.body
Our group supposes that Coke and Pepsi should participate in the condom distribution program because their brand is well-known all over the world. With their help, the program will be successful soon so that their fame and images will reach every corner of the world.

# data[].attributes.body
We agree because Coke and Pepsi have a big target market around the world. So if these brands are going to make advertising, it is most likely that people will use condoms in the relationship.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q5. Do you think it would be a good idea for Coke and Pepsi to participate in a condom distribution program in India, Brazil, and the United States?

# data[].attributes.subject
Q5. Do you think it would be a good idea for Coke and Pepsi to participate in a condom distribution program in India, Brazil, and the United States?

# data[].attributes.body
We agree on the approaches applied by the Indian government since the distribution of condoms to the barbers, a place where they can promote the idea of safe sex. But we disagree with the carnival of condoms in Brazil because there were too unhealthy activities that occurred as a mean of persuasion to have sex.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, there are two obvious differences. The first is cultural; because Americans' minds are so open, it is easy to carry condoms in your wallet, handbag, or anywhere else. However, India and Brazil are apprehensive about condom use. Theother is education, in India, sex education for high school is not really popular and men are quite embarrassed to talk to relatives and relatives. On the contrary, children have been mentioned by their parents to defend themselves from elementary school in the US.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q1. Comment on the Brazilian and Indian governments’ strategies for the prevention of AIDS via the marketing of condoms.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q1. Comment on the Brazilian and Indian governments’ strategies for the prevention of AIDS via the marketing of condoms.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q3. Would the approaches described in Brazil and India work in the United States? Why or why not?

# data[].attributes.subject
Q3. Would the approaches described in Brazil and India work in the United States? Why or why not?

# data[].attributes.headline
Q2. How is the AIDS problem different in the United States compared with Brazil and India?

# data[].attributes.subject
Q2. How is the AIDS problem different in the United States compared with Brazil and India?