# data[].attributes.headline
Group 3 (Naomi)Ya You;Xinyun Cao;Zhenghua Zhao 

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 3 (Naomi)Ya You;Xinyun Cao;Zhenghua Zhao 

# data[].attributes.body
Link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1znKYApkfbaMJdXU6-2P3kK_SaUrC0zoe/edit

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Group 4 3.1 Activity 3 & 3.2 Activity 1 

# data[].attributes.headline
Group1(Yinge Liu, Huini Li, Ziqi Cao, Kaiwen Zhou)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group1(Yinge Liu, Huini Li, Ziqi Cao, Kaiwen Zhou)

# data[].attributes.headline
GROUP 6 YECHUN WANG; JINHUAN ZHONG; YINGKANG LI

# data[].attributes.subject
GROUP 6 YECHUN WANG; JINHUAN ZHONG; YINGKANG LI

# data[].attributes.headline
Group8 Chen Zheng, Xiaohan Huang, Shan Zhang

# data[].attributes.subject
Group8 Chen Zheng, Xiaohan Huang, Shan Zhang

# data[].attributes.body
for group 5
1.yes
2.yes
3.yes
4.yes
5.yes

# data[].attributes.headline
Group2 (Jingwen Shi, Shuchang Wang, Huafan Li)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group2 (Jingwen Shi, Shuchang Wang, Huafan Li)

# data[].attributes.body
Link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-Mc90CpzhC8m-akfGz7_vlG7HARVhfqPGtsImtufls/edit

Group 2 for Group 5
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Yes
5. Yes

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 5 Jingxuan Nan,Boyang Bai, Chen Zhong, Mengying Li

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 5 Jingxuan Nan,Boyang Bai, Chen Zhong, Mengying Li

# data[].attributes.body
Group 5 for Group8
1
Yes
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
3.1 Activity 3  Jingxuan Nan, Boyang Bai, Chen Zhong

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 4 Mengying Li,Chen Zhong,Shan Zhang 

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 4 Mengying Li,Chen Zhong,Shan Zhang 

# data[].attributes.body
1. purple  green  orange
2.moreover, in addition
3 . first supporting claim 2;
second supporting claim 1
4.good
This paragraph cites more than two sources;
Include a clear topic sentence at the beginning;
Different perceptions of herbal medicines in older adults were compared.

# data[].attributes.body
1. academic support purple
Main claim/topic sentence green
Supporting statements orange
2. signifying language
3. 3 sources are used to support the first supporting claim and 1 is used for the second supporting statement.
4. we think this is a good example of synthesis.

# data[].attributes.body
1.
Purple : academic support
Green : main claim/ topic sentence
Orange  : supporting claim

2.
moreover, in addition

3.
first source: 2
second source: 1

4.
Not good enough. The structure of this paragraph is good, and use different sources to support the view. However, it doesn't have the concluding sentence, and the supporting source of second view is not enough.

# data[].attributes.headline
Group1 Ziqi Cao Jingxuan Nan Xiaohan Huang

# data[].attributes.subject
Group1 Ziqi Cao Jingxuan Nan Xiaohan Huang

# data[].attributes.body
1.
The academic support: Purple
The topic sentence: Green
The supporting claims: Orange
2. According to..., In addition, Moreover, However
3. The first: 4
The second: 1
4. We think this is a good example because there is enough evidence to support this paragraph, and he presents two different points of view.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Purple Green Orange
2.  moreover; in addition; however; for example
3. 4; 1
4. Good example. There are different sources and similar sources as well as comparison and evaluation.

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 5 (Jingwen Shi, Mingyang Liu, Yinge Liu)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 5 (Jingwen Shi, Mingyang Liu, Yinge Liu)

# data[].attributes.body
1.

The academic support (purple)

The main claim / topic sentence (green)

The supporting claims (orange)

2.
Moreover, ...
In addition, ...

3.
The first supporting claim: 2
The second supporting claim: 1

4.
Good example
Because the structure of this example is complete, a topic sentence is given. And every claim is backed by sources. A link language is also given to link between each source.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Purple  Green  Orange
2. According to / Moreover / For instance / In addition / However / For example
3. 3  1
4. Good, because it uses multiple literatures to prove the view, and there are comparisons and explanations for the literatures.
5. The second claim just have one source, a literature can be appropriately added to form a comparative argument.

# data[].attributes.headline
Group7 Chen Zheng, Hongxin Zhou, (Naomi)Ya You

# data[].attributes.subject
Group7 Chen Zheng, Hongxin Zhou, (Naomi)Ya You

# data[].attributes.body
1.
-purple

-green

-orange

2. According to.../Moreover/For example,  also highlight that.../This may be due to/in addition/evidence suggests that...
3.
The first: 2
The second: 1
4.Good example
yes it is a good example. because it have more than 2 academic source and includes agree and disagree points to combined. as well as it have main sentence at the the beginning. It also includes clear topic sentences, supporting claims, and academic support.

# data[].attributes.body
1.

The academic support (purple)

The main claim / topic sentence (green)

The supporting claims (orange)

2.
Moreover, ...
In addition, ...

3.
The first supporting claim: 2
The second supporting claim: 1

4.
Good example
Because the structure of this example is complete, a topic sentence is given. And every claim is backed by sources. A link language is also given to link between each source.

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 3 Mingyang Liu；Zhenghua Zhao； Huafan Li；Kaiwen Zhou

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 3 Mingyang Liu；Zhenghua Zhao； Huafan Li；Kaiwen Zhou

# data[].attributes.body
Q1:
A -- lV
B -- lll
C -- ll
D -- V
E -- l

Q2:
EBDCA

Q3：
ACD

Q4：
all YES except C

# data[].attributes.body
1. A4 B3 C2 D5 E1
2. ECBDA
3. CDE
4. YES YES NO NO NO
5. C
6. A Shelton, Lane & Waldhart, 1999
B Perry and Hosade-Curlin, 1998

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 6 Qi Xia, Shan Zhang, Xinyun Cao, Yingkang Li

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 6 Qi Xia, Shan Zhang, Xinyun Cao, Yingkang Li

# data[].attributes.body
1. A-IV; B-iii; C-ii; D-v; E-I

2. Data and statistics (Quantitative Support)
Specific examples (Qualitative Support)
Quotes (Expert Opinion)
Citations without details (Agreement from expert)
Logical explanation (usually talking about research gap)

3. ADE

4.yes yes no yes no

5. C

6.the primary source: ( Lane & Waldhart, 1999 )
the secondary source: Perry and Hosade-Curlin, 1998 cited in Shelton

# data[].attributes.body
Q1:
A -- lV
B -- lll
C -- ll
D -- V
E -- l

Q2:
1. E
2. B
3. C
4. D
5. A

Q3:
ACD

Q4:
A. Yes
B. Yes
C. No
D. Yes
E. No

Q5:
C

Q6:
1. Primary source: Shelton, Lane & Waldhart, 1999
2. Secondary source: Perry and Hosade-Curlin, 1998

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(12)(1)

# data[].attributes.headline
Group4 Chen Zheng, Hongxin Zhou, (Naomi)Ya You, Yechun Wang

# data[].attributes.subject
Group4 Chen Zheng, Hongxin Zhou, (Naomi)Ya You, Yechun Wang

# data[].attributes.body
1.A-Ⅳ
B-Ⅲ
C-Ⅱ
D-Ⅴ
E-Ⅰ
2.
(1).E
(2).B
(3).C
(4).D
(5).A
3.
B
C
D
4.A. yes B. yes C.no D. yes E. yes
5.C
6.The primary source is Shelton, Lane & Waldhart,1999. The secondary source is Perry and Hosade-Curlin, 1998

# data[].attributes.body
(1)A-4; B-3; C-2; D-5; E-1

(2)EBCDA

(3)ABE

4. A  YES.  B  YES.  C  YES.  D  YES.  E  YES.

5. C

6. primary: Shelton, Lane & Waldhart (1999)

secondary: Perry and Hosade-Curlin (1998)

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 5 Jingwen Shi, Huini Li, Boyang Bai, (Bella) Jingxuan Nan

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 5 Jingwen Shi, Huini Li, Boyang Bai, (Bella) Jingxuan Nan

# data[].attributes.body
Q1
A 4

B 3

C 2

D 5

E 1

Q2
EBCDA

Q3
ACD

Q4
Yes, Yes, No, No, No

Q5
C

Q6
Shelton, Lane & Waldhart, 1999
Perry and Hosade-Curlin, 1998

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(12)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(12)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(15)(1)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(13)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(12)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
W2 L2 Literature Review Plan & Partial Template

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(15)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(12)

# data[].attributes.body
It still needs to be improved.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(11)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(12)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
RP L1W2-Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(12)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(12)

# data[].attributes.body
only headings and subheadings. I have some trouble to find the sources as they are all news rather than articles.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template123

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(13)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literature Review Plan & Partial Template(7) (1)

# data[].attributes.headline
G2 Yingkang  Naomi  Zhenghua Yangyan  Mengying  Hongxin

# data[].attributes.subject
G2 Yingkang  Naomi  Zhenghua Yangyan  Mengying  Hongxin

# data[].attributes.body
Q1: A.yes   B.yes   C.yes
Q2:Yes
Q3:Yes

# data[].attributes.headline
Group1 Jinghuan Zhong, Chen Zheng, Ruidong Jiang, Jingxuan Nan, Qi Xia, Yongqi Wei

# data[].attributes.subject
Group1 Jinghuan Zhong, Chen Zheng, Ruidong Jiang, Jingxuan Nan, Qi Xia, Yongqi Wei

# data[].attributes.body
1.a. yes
b. yes
c. yes

2. yes

3. yes
4.Make the contents in the resources column correspond to the contents in the notes column as far as possible, which helps others to view and browse, and makes it more intuitive and clear

A large portion of the resources are old and may not be relatively new sources

Similar content can be merged

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 4 Xiaohan Huang Mingyang Liu Huini Li Huafan Li Ziqi Cao(Section 3)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 4 Xiaohan Huang Mingyang Liu Huini Li Huafan Li Ziqi Cao(Section 3)

# data[].attributes.body
1.
a. Yes
b. No
C. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Using the literature less than ten years old

# data[].attributes.headline
Group5: Boyang, Shuchang, Shan Zhang, Hanyun, Hebe

# data[].attributes.subject
Group5: Boyang, Shuchang, Shan Zhang, Hanyun, Hebe

# data[].attributes.body
1. Y  Y  Y
2. Y
3. N. Only 11.
4. Too much reliance on a single resource.

# data[].attributes.headline
Correct answers to activity 3 week 2 lesson 1

# data[].attributes.subject
Correct answers to activity 3 week 2 lesson 1

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 1 Huini Li, Jinhuan Zhong, Boyang Bai

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 1 Huini Li, Jinhuan Zhong, Boyang Bai

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
EXAMPLE Part A incomplete main body plan (1)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
EXAMPLE Part A incomplete main body plan

# data[].attributes.headline
Group2 Chen Zheng, Chen Zhong, Shuchang Wang, Yinge Liu 

# data[].attributes.subject
Group2 Chen Zheng, Chen Zhong, Shuchang Wang, Yinge Liu 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
EXAMPLE Part A incomplete main body plan

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 4(RuiDong Jiang/ZhengHua Zhao/YeChun Wang)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 4(RuiDong Jiang/ZhengHua Zhao/YeChun Wang)

# data[].attributes.body
1. C 2. E 3. D 4. F 5. H 6. A 7. I 8. G 9. J 10 .B

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
EXAMPLE Part A incomplete main body plan

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 6 Jingwen Shi  Mingyang Liu Ziqi Cao

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 6 Jingwen Shi  Mingyang Liu Ziqi Cao

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
EXAMPLE Part A incomplete main body plan