# data[].attributes.body
This graph is good because it clearly and accurately shows the differences in that data. It starts at zero and doesn't has disproportionate differences. Its easy to read and understand.

# data[].attributes.body
This graph is good because there are bar's to match up with each month and it is very clear which bar goes with which month in the picture. The graph is also labeled correctly and very understandable for students to read.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a good graph due to multiple reasons. Each bar is clearly labeled, equal in size, and clearly colored, thus easily presenting the information that was gathered.

# data[].attributes.body
This graph is bad because the topics at the bottom don't match up with the number of bar's there are in the graph. This graph also isn't accurate because there are more bar's than topics at the bottom of the graph

# data[].attributes.body
This graph isn't good because it shows a huge difference between 87 and 83. There is also no source shown for the information presented. Another mistake the graph makes is that it does not start at 0.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a good graph because I can clearly see that the rainfall is what is being measured and that it is being done in inches and it starts at zero
The graph also clearly shows each region with the colors and the labels.
The months are equal in size and separation which makes them easy to compare.

# data[].attributes.body
This is not a good graph because the scale is misleading. The lower value starts on 34 and the top goes to 42, thus causing a seemingly larger gap between the two values. There is also no source presented in the image.

# data[].attributes.body
This is not a good graph because I don't know what court case they are talking about.
I also don't know how many people were surveyed for this graph so I don't understand the percentages.
The graphs labels on the y-axis are confusing and I don't know what the graph data means and it doesn't start at zero.