# data[].attributes.body
1. We checked other pages. He also recommended slathering your skin in insecticide.

2. Attempts to use enough jargon to trick people into buying a product. 'Dr' Axe misunderstands all of the journal articles he includes.

# data[].attributes.body
Gives some good general info and background but it is not useable as a cited source.

# data[].attributes.body
No proven oral benefits

Not an essential mineral: The body has no known function or use for silver, and it is not an essential mineral like iron or zinc.

No evidence for internal treatment: There is no reliable scientific or clinical evidence to support claims that ingesting colloidal silver can prevent or treat any disease, including cancer, viruses, or infections.

Ineffective as an antibiotic: When ingested, colloidal silver is not absorbed in high enough concentrations to act as an antibiotic throughout the body. The antimicrobial properties seen in lab settings do not translate to effective internal treatment.

Significant health risks

Argyria: The most common and visible side effect is argyria, a permanent, bluish-gray discoloration of the skin, eyes, and internal organs. This is caused by silver accumulating in the body's tissues over time.

Organ damage: Ingesting colloidal silver can cause severe, long-lasting problems, including damage to the kidneys, liver, and nervous system.

Drug interactions: It can interfere with the absorption and effectiveness of certain medications, including antibiotics and thyroid medications.

Heavy metal toxicity: As a heavy metal, silver can be toxic at high doses. The FDA does not regulate colloidal silver products as heavily as prescription drugs, so the actual silver concentration can vary widely and unpredictably.

(Anu, Matt)

# data[].attributes.body
There are no known benefits

The FDA has warned consumers that this is not effective

It was used to “treat” infection before the creation of antibiotics

It has not been proven to be safe

(Matt, Anu)

# data[].attributes.body
Human error is a morally better option than using a robot that sounds like a human.

# data[].attributes.body
Has some reliable source, some that do not seem reliable. It doesn't specifically discuss colloidal silver. I would not cite this source in my paper.

# data[].attributes.body
- The content comes from a combination of different places. Would not cite this source in a paper but some of the places it lists like the FDA or NIH can be valid sources.

# data[].attributes.body
While probably not the best resource to rely on for research or an answer, I would say it's a good starting point to think about the pros and cons of colloidal silver. Overall, would not use to form a proper opinion

# data[].attributes.headline
Sketchy and biased the recommended other articles also were questionable

# data[].attributes.subject
Sketchy and biased the recommended other articles also were questionable

# data[].attributes.body
AI has the ability to cite sources that do not exist and make up information that sounds extremely believable when it is not in reality, making it an unreliable source. AI is also known to be bad at responding to scientific questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Website is formatted in a way that appears like an ad, data is provided and cited but not described, making it easier to be convinced that the product is desirable.

# data[].attributes.body
created by Dr. John Axe from TN (MD nutritionist)

References the NIH, however only certain information is communicated

There is a transactional motivation for supplement sales

No because there is too much opinion and little facts in his posts

# data[].attributes.body
Not a good source

Does not give in depth analysis and only summarizes

# data[].attributes.body
1. NIH

2. FDA, Federal Trade Commission

3. To determine whether it is safe, effective, and should be used

4. Yes, because it is a government website, has a lot of credibility, and provides in depth information

(Jimmy, Courtney A, Annie N, Mackenzie Levi, Stuart)

# data[].attributes.body
While its direct answer may not be immediately trustworthy, it provides links to its resources to verify its information, and those sources can be very helpful.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Google AI Mode gave us information from the NIH, WebMD, and Mayo Clinic

2. From the above sources, they pulled information about the dangers of ingesting and the lack of medical evidence for certain health claims.

# data[].attributes.body
Has some reliable sources and other less reliable sources

# data[].attributes.body
The data collected is cherry-picked to persuade you into buying the product. This information isn't necessarily false, but it can be misleading due to the lack of proper data.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Dr. Josh Axe

2. Research papers from PubMed

3. Sell products

4. No seems like a cash grab

# data[].attributes.body
Provides believable information, but does not provide sources for its claims. Would not use.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think that I would be able to pull scientific findings from AI. I think I can only get simple, standard information about colloidal silver. Google mode AI also pulled online sources from magazines/fake health blogs.

# data[].attributes.body
The guvernmint 🇺🇸

Peer-reviewed scientific papers based on data

To be a database for accurate, peer-reviewed scientific findings based on data

Yeah probably I think so

(Alexis, Markham, Luke, Shelby, & Annabelle)

# data[].attributes.body
High variability for inaccuracy that sounds believable. Not backed up by multiple real sources.

# data[].attributes.body
Who created this content?

What kind of evidence is used?

What’s the purpose or motivation behind it?

Would you cite this resource in a paper? Why/why not?

# data[].attributes.body
Who created this content?

What kind of evidence is used?

What’s the purpose or motivation behind it?

Would you cite this resource in a paper? Why/why not?

# data[].attributes.body
Who created this content?

What kind of evidence is used?

What’s the purpose or motivation behind it?

Would you cite this resource in a paper? Why/why not?

# data[].attributes.body
Who created this content?

What kind of evidence is used?

What’s the purpose or motivation behind it?

Would you cite this resource in a paper? Why/why not?