# data[].attributes.body
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef015438b60ba1970c-800wi

# data[].attributes.body
http://ujsciencelibrarian.pbworks.com/w/page/25452469/Online%20Books

# data[].attributes.body
http://bookhurricane.com/printed-books-vs-ereaders/

# data[].attributes.body
I strongly agree with what's been exposed in that article. Indeed, we can make reading a lot more convivial and enjoyable.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Wattpad is the best place to read and share stories.

# data[].attributes.body
One suggestion is that the author should be notified how many people are discussing their books, and be able to access this conversations by asking the group if he can join in. This could create many false profiles, so the website should find a way to differentiate the real authors so the users can know if they are fake or not

# data[].attributes.body
Im worried that we are going to lose the traditional sensation given by paper books that can not be transmitted through a display. The marked of book can also be considered in danger, editors, libraries and book shops are amazing environments that might be lost in the future.

# data[].attributes.body
Literature may get to a whole new level. If everyone puts his opinion on "what the author thought while writing ", we'd get so many different perspectives that we could actually have one of the most balanced point of view on any book available.

# data[].attributes.body
It is a good idea. However, some people that didn't buy the book would be able to read it due to the sharing. I would suggest that everyone participating had already purchased the book on their own

# data[].attributes.body
what excites me is that this advanced technology helps

the e-book readers to be close to each other in a way that

makes them open minded about the issues that they discuss.

# data[].attributes.body
It's a good idea for those who attend to book clubs. The could improve their club to an international level, where people from around the world connect together to read and share

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it will make up people's mind. People will get to see so many points of view that they won't be able to know what to think anymore.

# data[].attributes.body
As a teacher, will this encourage academic dishonesty?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Deception is providing false information to a teacher/instructor concerning a formal academic exercise. Examples of this include taking more time on a take-home test than is allowed, giving a dishonest excuse when asking for a deadline extension, or falsely claiming to have submitted work.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology can surely be a push towards the fusion of individuals with the world wide community.

However the information that are too easy to get can sometimes be ignored and underrated, the massive use of technology can in fact affect new generation way of learning and exploring the world

# data[].attributes.body
Would this be great for studying? You could see other people's ideas and it might help with assignments...

# data[].attributes.body
the article should define the concept of

"social book" more clearly, because its meaning

remain very vague. What is a "social book" in specific?

# data[].attributes.body
It worries me that sometimes we won't

be able to read the book peacefully, or

that someone will ruin a good convesation.

The article doesn't specify if the host is able

to block those who are not cooperating with

the conversation. Also, most people prefer

reading alone. It is their "alone time". So,

there would be no profit

# data[].attributes.body
From what I read in the article, my view on the issue

is that technology and the Social Networks facilitate our

way to communicate with others.

referring to the SocialBook I believe is an improvement

that does not make us very anti-social

because we have the opportunity to share with

others our thoughts and opinions on a certain book and not just to keep it to ourselves.

# data[].attributes.body
What's going on legally speaking? Isn't that violating the privacy bubble? How about authors ? Should they allow the publication of their books?

# data[].attributes.body
the article should define the concept of "social book" more clearly, because its meaning remain very vague. What is a "social book" in specific? How many people use it? how does it look like?

These are the kind of details that the article should present.

# data[].attributes.body
What WORRIES you about the ideas

and issues in the article?

# data[].attributes.body
What EXCITES you about the ideas and issues in the article?

# data[].attributes.body
What is your STANCE (view) on the issues

presented in this article? What SUGGESTIONS

do you have about the issues & ideas?

# data[].attributes.body
What do you NEED to know more

about in relation to the ideas presented in the article?