# data[].attributes.body
Evidence card E is a strong piece of evidence because it goes into detail about the observations. Evidence card F isn't as detailed as E, but still has important details and observations. Evidence card D doesn't go into to much detail it explains what we already can see instead of breaking it down.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence Card G: is the weakest evidence card because it does graze the surface of all the info in the evidence card but there could be more said and the part where it says each toe has several bones is incorrect because even the toe with the most bones has less than several bones.

Evidence Card H: is the strongest evidence card because it goes in depth on the card and includes more info than evidence card g by breaking the info down into bullet points.

Evidence Card I:is the second strongest evidence card because compared to the other 2 evidence cards, evidence card I only has two bones in the card and still describes a lot of the image.

# data[].attributes.body
Card G: is a strong evidence card because it describes everything we need to know about the foot but it isn't descriptive.
Card H: it is a stronger evidence card because it goes more in depth with each individual thing about the foot and it provides more information about it.
Card I: this evidence card is not very strong because it describes the shoulder bone but it could have been more descriptive.

# data[].attributes.body
Card G is not very detailed and is not strong, it only talks about the size and number of toes the Tometti Feet has, it is not detailed in it's description.
Card H is a strong piece of evidence because it shows in detail the structure of the foot and provide us with good information.
Card I is strong evidence and really detailed because the evidence explains that the tometti foot has four toes on each foot and that the toes on the left are smaller than the toes on the right.

# data[].attributes.body
Card G is not a strong piece of evidence because it is weak and is not  very informative.
Card H :Strong evidence and really detailed because the evidence explains that the tometti foot has four toes on each foot and that the toes on the left are smaller than the toes on the right.  The evidence is numbered like the evidence on how many bones there are in each toe like 2,3,4,5 from left to right also ends off that the toes ar point on the end.
Card I: is not very detailed or strong, it only talks about the appearance of the Tometti Shoulder Bone and is not specific at all. Card I also barely elaborates on the size and shape of the Tometti Shoulder Bone.

# data[].attributes.body
Card G: Is not very detailed and is not strong, it only talks about the size and number of toes the Tometti Feet has, it is not detailed in it's description.

Card H: is very detailed and strong, it talks about the number of foot bones and toe bones that are in the Tometti Feet, and also talks about the appearance of the Tometti Feet in a clear and detailed way. For example Card H says "The Tometti fossil has four toes on each foot
(back limb). The bones on the left toe are very small."

Card I: is not very detailed or strong, it only talks about the appearance of the Tometti Shoulder Bone and is not specific at all. Card I also barely elaborates on the size and shape of the Tometti Shoulder Bone. For instance, Card I does not talk about how many bones are in the Tometti Shoulder Bone.

Strongest to weakest: Card H is the strongest card because it has more than two pieces of evidence about the Tometti feet than Card I and G have. Although card I talks about the Tometti shoulder bone, which is a different body structure from card H and G, card H still has more descriptive details. Card G is the second strongest, although card G does not have a lot of evidence, card G talks about the size and number of toes the Tometti Feet has, whereas, the weakest card, card I only talks about the appearance of the Tometti Shoulder Bone and is not specific.

# data[].attributes.body
i dont think that card g is strong it docent even make that much sense.
Card h is really strong and gives a strong understanding of the foot.
card i is okay its in the middle because its giving us okay information.

# data[].attributes.body
Card G is not a strong piece of evidence because it is weak and is not  very informative.
Card H is a strong piece of evidence because it shows in detail the structure of the foot and provide us with good information.
Card I is somewhat informative and it is kind of detailed and gives us information we did not know.

# data[].attributes.body
card d: i dont think its strong enough because it doesnt really support or talks into details about the bones.
card e: i think it supports because it strong and it goes into more details about bones and explains everything
card f: it kinda in between because it shows details but it doesnt explain anything

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Card E is a strong and detailed card because it explains and shows the differences of size between the three fingers with lots of detail.

# data[].attributes.body
Card E: Strong and detailed because it specifically describes the differences of size between the three fingers with lots of detail.

Card F: Less strong and detailed than card E because it tries to describe the differences between fingers but it does with little to no detail and without any measurements.

Card D: Less strong and detailed because it gives a very vague and under described description of the new fossils tail without any measurements.

From strongest to weakest, the order is E,F,D. I put E first because it specifically describes the differences of size between the three fingers with lots of detail. The other two evidence cards attempt to describe a certain structure, whether its the tail or the fingers. But they give very vague explanation and the reader gains little to no knowledge from reading the descriptions.

# data[].attributes.body
Card A talks about the holes in the skull card B is more detailed in talking abot the skull and card C is te mos detailing in talking about the tailbone and how long it is and stuff

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Evidence Card E is the best observation for many reasons. For 1, it is the most descriptive and it gives you the most information. It also identifies the name of the picture and it describes what you are seeing. Second, it gives a lot of detail while D and F do not since they just include the basics. D and F do not give as much clear and specific information as E does and that is why I believe that Evidence Card E is the best observation because it gives you the best information in the best way possible.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Evidence Card E And is the most detailed card than the two other D and E because there a lot of compares and contrast and we need that and it’s more specific Like it talk the size of bones the type/kind And also Evidence Card F it’s very simple and very unique it not that much details. So this why I think card E is very strong and detailed card!!

# data[].attributes.body
Card G is the weak evidence and not detailed because because the evidence explains that the tometti foot has four toes and that each toe has different  sizes

Card H is the strongest and detailed because it explain how tometti foot has four toes on each foot and that the toes on the left are smaller than the toes on the right.

Card I is a weak and not detailed evidence because Weak evidence and not detailed because the evidence just explains the sholder of the bone of the tometti is curved at the point where the arm meets the sholder bone also that the sholder is the bone that connects the sholder to the rest of the body.

The Strongest to weakest Card is H, G, I because evidence card H was the most detailed card out of the three than G is detailed but not a lot and last I is the weakest because is not detailed.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence card E is the most detailed card than cards D and F. Evidence cards D and F are just telling how the picture looks like. While, card E is more creative and more detailed. So card E is the strongest then Card F and the weak card is D.

# data[].attributes.body
i think is card B because it explains more mof where are the holes in the skull and it explains more about  how big they are. and card A is the less strong because it talks about the holes in the skull but it doesn't say much about it.

# data[].attributes.body
evidence card E is the most detailed because cards D and F are just pointing out the obvious and isnt putting much detail into their cards. card E gives a lot of thought into the card. The person who has card E was observing the bones and comparing it.

# data[].attributes.body
i think evidence card A

# data[].attributes.body
I think evidence card E provides the most detail because it talks about what kind of bones it has and the number of bones. Card E also gives more information the cards D and F. I also know this because cards D and F just talk about how the bones are different sizes and doesn't really give good information.

# data[].attributes.body
E because it not only goes into detail it even explains it. Card f is a little descriptive but not enough and card d just talks about important parts and isnt as descriptive

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence card E is the most detailed evidence card. It provides a very detailed description of the picture and points out important points to take away from the image. Evidence card D is second because it is not as descriptive but it mentions all the important parts of the picture and gives a well enough summary for you to understand the overall concept. Evidence card F is last because it is very vague and does not give much detail on the image. Much of the words used in the description are very vague and can be used to describe anything.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence Card E is the most strongest piece of evidence between cards D, E, and F. Since evidence card E is very detailed compared to D and F. I would day that D is the second most useful since it is informing us about the tail and it can be very similar to things like a crocodile tail. While I put F at last because the information given is very vague and is information you can already know by just looking at the fossil itself.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence Card E is the most strongest piece of evidence between Cards D and F. Evidence Card E is the strongest piece of evidence, because it is the most detailed piece. Though Evidence Cards D and F describes how the bone structures look like but it does not fully describe the exact sizes, the structure and the amount of bones.

# data[].attributes.body
Card G: Weak evidence and not detailed because the evidence explains that the tometti foot has four toes and that each toe has different  sizes and that the end of the toes are pointy also that each toe has lots of bones.
Card H :Strong evidence and really detailed because the evidence explains that the tometti foot has four toes on each foot and that the toes on the left are smaller than the toes on the right.  The evidence is numbered like the evidence on how many bones there are in each toe like 2,3,4,5 from left to right also ends off that the toes ar point on the end.
Card I : Weak evidence and not detailed because the evidence just explains the sholder bone of the tometti is curved at the point where the arm meets the sholder bone also that the sholder is the bone that connects the sholder to the rest of the body.

Strongest to weakest: Card H, G, I
because evidence card H was the most detailed card out of the three so that would make it the strongest. Then card G is second because G has some detail but not too much and does have evidence for the tometti. Finally card I is last because it was just poor evidence to explain the tometti's sholder bone.

# data[].attributes.body
Card D: I think it isn't the strongest card since it doesn't explain all the parts of the tail and how it functions like the evidence card could explain how long the tail is.
And for evidence card E and F these are strong evidence cards since they are more detailed and explained so when we compare the fossil with the ostriches and crocodiles we can make a prediction

# data[].attributes.body
card D: not very strong evidence because its says the tail is long and compares the bone sizes but doesn't give the actual bone sizes and doesn't give the number of numbers on the tail.
card E :strong because it talks about the size of the bones on the fingers and how many bones are i each finger.
card F: this evidence is not strong because it doesn't talk about the the size of the bones on the finger and how many bones are in each finger like evidence card E.

# data[].attributes.body
For evidence card D, which talks about the tail, is strong because the tail can be something useful when differentiating between two species. Was it well detailed? No not at all but it told me the bear minimum of what I need to know. Now for evidence cards E & F, which talks about the hands, these pieces were benificial because they were well detailed and very specific. I believe it is strong because there are numeral things that could be off between the mystery fossils hands and the the other spicies. Overall evidence card D was the strongest piece of evidence, second is E because it tells more and shows more than card F leaving card F as the weakest piece of evidence out of the 3.

# data[].attributes.headline
For each of the 3 cards your class is assigned decide if it provides an observation that is detailed and strong, or one that is less strong and not as detailed and WHY you think this. Then order the cards strongest to weakest and explain your choices.

# data[].attributes.subject
For each of the 3 cards your class is assigned decide if it provides an observation that is detailed and strong, or one that is less strong and not as detailed and WHY you think this. Then order the cards strongest to weakest and explain your choices.

# data[].attributes.body
DONT FORGET TO WRITE YOUR NAME :)

# data[].attributes.body
Card X: Strong and detailed because it specifically talks about the number and shape of holes in the skull

Card Y: less strong and less detailed because it only talks about the size of the teeth and that is not as helpful as the number or shape of the teeth.

Card Z: strong and detailed because it talks about the number of bones in the tail

Strongest to weakest: card x, card z, card y. I put card y last because it is the least strong evidence and is not detailed at all. While cards x and z were both detailed card x was more detailed because it talked about size and shape of the skull holes. While card z only talks about number of bones in the tail. So card z only has 1 very detailed piece of evidence while card x has 2 detailed pieces of evidence.