# data[].attributes.body
21 NOV 2017, 10.26am

# data[].attributes.body
e-portfolio

# data[].attributes.body
Thank you all.. had a great time cracking ideas with all of you :)

# data[].attributes.body
updated 21 Nov 2017, 8.45am

# data[].attributes.body
An Assessment FOR Learning

# data[].attributes.body
APA Format
Lorenzo, G., & Ittleson, J. (2005). Demonstrating and assessing student learning with eportfolios. EDUCAUSE-ELI Paper 3, 2005.

Lorenzo, G., & Ittleson, J. (2005). Demonstrating and assessing student learning with eportfolios. EDUCAUSE-ELI Paper 3, 2005.

Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT Initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436–449. http://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2

Beck, R. J., Livne, N. L., & Bear, S. L. (2005). Teachers’ self assessmentof the effects of formative and summative electronic portfolios on professional development. , 28(3), 221-244. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 221–244. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619760500268733

# data[].attributes.headline
Things to consider when implementing E-Portfolio

# data[].attributes.subject
Things to consider when implementing E-Portfolio

# data[].attributes.body
Just an ideas....
1. Learning Objective
2. Problem/Project Focus
3. Instruction
4. Reflect and Access

# data[].attributes.body
Syamsul Nor Azlan

# data[].attributes.body
1. Low self-concept

2. Reponses and reflective rate among lecturer and students

3. Lack of appropriate pedagogy and learning strategies

4. Time consuming for lecturer to organize and evaluate

5. Content overloaded

6. Difficulty converting qualitative information into quantitative data
7. Possible procedural problems with implementation.

# data[].attributes.body
1. overcome time-space limitation and ease storing problems
2. Providing ongoing communication and exchanges of information

3. Promote shift in ownership

4. Assessing more complex and important aspect of learning

5. Promote student self assessment

6. Promotes collaborative assessment

7. Focus on improvement not comparison with others

8. Assessment process is individualized

9. Flexibility and adaptability