# data[].attributes.body
Mountain chains can be used as evidence for plate tectonics because you can see where some places go together. As an example, North America and Europe mountains look like they were together but got torn apart. Also Scandes and Greenland and Appalachian mountains were formed at the same time without tectonic plates we wouldn't have different continets and mountains.

# data[].attributes.body
Glacial deposits can be used as evidence of plate tectonics because of where the glaciers were found. For example the only way to explain that glaciers being found in Africa and South America from the same time period would be that they were connected at one point. Without plate tectonics these two continents would still be connected.

# data[].attributes.body
Glaciers can be used as evidence for plate tectonics because there are glacial deposits in diffrent places on diffrent continents and they are the sam glacial deposits so obviosuly they were once connected. Without plate tectonics eveerything wouldnot have been connected.

# data[].attributes.body
Mountains can be used as evidence of plate tectonics because North America and Europe were formed at the same time and they also consist of the same sediments.The Scandes are made up of volcanic and seafloor sedimentary rock. The Appalachian mountains have a combination of igneous and sedimentary rock. Without plate tectonics we wouldn't really understand why and how places were connected.

# data[].attributes.body
Miguel, Hernán and Logan

# data[].attributes.body
Mountains can be used as evidence of plate tectonics because some mountains were formed around the same time and now they're in different place in the world. For example, the only way to explain the formation of the mountains is that the mountains that were once together are now split up. Without plate tectonics, the mountains wouldn't be formed.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Fossils did the best because they have the best picture and concept of what's happening.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the glaciers he closest due to the way the glaciers  are in  the right positions .

# data[].attributes.body
Fossils was the closest.

# data[].attributes.body
i think sommer"s group in the mountains group was the best because it has the closest shape to a pangea.

# data[].attributes.body
i think that glaciers are the best evidence for Pangaea because they connect better than everything else

# data[].attributes.body
i think mountains represent Pangaea the best because it shows how mountains are in different countries and how they are the same that they were once unified.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the glaciers were the closets because they connect better then any other evidence

# data[].attributes.body
Mountains were evidence becuase they all connect right

# data[].attributes.body
Charlie,Juan, Issac.
The continents are in the correct order.

# data[].attributes.body
i thought the glaciers was the most closest to pangea

# data[].attributes.body
Most of the fossils were found in different areas but they were the same and they could swim which leads use to think the contintents were connected. SoSowwithout plate tectonics we wouldn't have the different fossils in the different areas.

# data[].attributes.body
i think windell

# data[].attributes.body
i think glaciers because they are mire closer together.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that fossils did the best because they look like they got the closest to looking like pangea