# data[].attributes.body
Alexander the gree was not an effective leader...... because he was mean to his dad and hiss warrios army alexander the greee ......also very selfish taking and celebrating his fathers death....... and comander,persia...also But at the same time Alexander controlled. And even him and his mthar.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Alexander the Great wasn’t a success leader. I think that because he controlled alot  of places and didn’t even ask his people if they liked the way that he ruled his people. He thought that he was earning respect from his people but he was only getting hatred form them.

# data[].attributes.body
Alexander the Great was an effective leader beffc

# data[].attributes.body
Alexander was a great leader because he helped people come together and him in his army was very strong and they had victory.

# data[].attributes.body
I don’t think he was that great cause he did bring people togetherness but once he died they all went into war again. This shows that they really didn’t

like eachother when they worked together.his changes were Not permanent. So I not think he was a effective leader. All of the things he didn’t were changed

# data[].attributes.body
Alexander was a great leader because he had lead many army’s to victory.and he looks good cause of everything he had done

# data[].attributes.body
He was not an effective leader because he was mean to his dad and his warriors/ Army. Alexander the Great was also very selfish taking and celebrating his fathers death. But at the same time Alexander controlled. And even he was very selfish and only cared about himself. He grew up in Macedonia . That effected his childhood. Also Persia  was also a respected and wealthy place.

# data[].attributes.body
A good leader and he was a lea

# data[].attributes.body
Alexander was a great leader because he learned about warfare,politics and sports and as he got older he conquered the Greek city states

# data[].attributes.body
I think that he was a affective leader because there was many important things and he did great things for his envirment and I think he was a effective leader

# data[].attributes.body
Alexander the Great was pretty great. because he controlled what happened in Macedonia. He was respectful bacuse he listened. He was a commander because he commanded people to do things. And he expanded his empire an army

# data[].attributes.body
Alexander the Great was great and he was an effective leader. I think he was a effective leader because he expanded his kingdom and he conquered. He also made his army stronger. So that’s why I think he was a effected leader.

# data[].attributes.body
Alexander the Great was born on 356 BCE,300 year more then Jesus of Nasareth

# data[].attributes.body
Alexander the Great was pretty great. He was great because he knew how to take control. He also expanded his territory, so his “group” could gain more land. He was also very respected and looked up to. His army was also very strong and armored. He lived in Macedonia, Persia was a respected, “wealthy” place that he wanted to “take over”, he wanted to expand more. He didn’t care about what happened he wanted to do good things for his “group”.

# data[].attributes.body
Alexander the Great was an effective leader because he effected the world in a good way. He grew up in Macedonia. Aristotle said “Oh Alexander,you should grow up to be a legend. I have a story to read to you. It is called Homer’s Illad and it will teach you how a real hero is supposed to act or do.” It mattered once he died. His empire collapsed,and his phalax gave up when he died. It brought tears to Julius Caesar.

# data[].attributes.body
Alexander the Great was not an effective leader. Sure, he was inspiring to others who lived after him,(for example, Julius Ceaser wept at how successful he was at such a young age), and he was respected, but the first thing he did was try to conquer Persia. When he became a commander, that’s the first thing he set out to do, just to expand Macedonia. He did many things that were selfish or something worse.
*Taking Darius’ daughter as his second wife, just so he was an heir to the throne of Persia
*Kiling Cleopatra’s daughter, driving Cleopatra to ....you know what.. (even if he didn’t do it, it was done for him.)
Jeez, what did this guy have against daughters?
Many other things as well.
Therefore, in my opinion, Alexander the Great was not an effective leader.

# data[].attributes.headline
Alexander the Great was not an effective leader.

# data[].attributes.subject
Alexander the Great was not an effective leader.

# data[].attributes.body
Alexander was an effective leader because he was a great commondar and  respected others. He also defeated the Persia empire with his other troops. He controlled his people in a respectful way, people thought of him like a leader and that what he is. A great leader.