# data[].attributes.body
when looking at accidental object / plinth relationships in urban life i decided that what differentiated plinth from object was its ability to move. plinths having a set location and objects being free moving. to me the ability to remain grounded and be free moving is equally as significant.

# data[].attributes.headline
ACCIDENTAL OBJECT AND PLINTH RELATIONSHIPS?

# data[].attributes.subject
ACCIDENTAL OBJECT AND PLINTH RELATIONSHIPS?

# data[].attributes.body
on the other end of the spectrum, but equally as interesting to me. also does a good job of erasing object hierarchy.

what makes it accidental?

is anything ever really done by accident?

when people give objects a place, do they always, at least a bit, or subconsciously, consider where they put it aesthetically?

# data[].attributes.body
in this piece i think it is debatable who is art and who is plinth. i think this is as direct the relationship between the two can get, it blurs the hierarchy between them and forces equality in aesthetic appeal and purpose.

# data[].attributes.headline
TRADITIONAL PLINTH & STATUE RELATIONSHIP

# data[].attributes.subject
TRADITIONAL PLINTH & STATUE RELATIONSHIP

# data[].attributes.body
this relationship serves its purpose and portrays the hierarchy of the statue, but i found the accidental objects to be more interesting, i.e. the cone and the birds. they unintentionally erase the significance of the statue and force it to become the plinth. it is definitely more appealing to me when a plinth and its artwork interact and have a more developed relationship. i like when the art really uses its plinth.