# data[].attributes.body
If the French and Indian War had not occurred then the continental army would not have had enough experience to fight the British army. The Continental army got experience from fighting against British soldiers in the French and Indian War. The Experience of fighting the soldiers would help the Americans fight against the British army.

# data[].attributes.headline
The Continental Army was experienced enough to fight in the French and Indian War because many soldiers in the Continental Army had gained experience while fighting as British soldiers in the French and Indian War. If the French and Indian War had not occurred, then the Continental Army wouldn’t have any experience to fight in a War. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The Continental Army was experienced enough to fight in the French and Indian War because many soldiers in the Continental Army had gained experience while fighting as British soldiers in the French and Indian War. If the French and Indian War had not occurred, then the Continental Army wouldn’t have any experience to fight in a War. 

# data[].attributes.headline
No, The Continental army would have been trained and experienced enough to fight the British army. The Continental Army would not have had any training or experience fighting because they didn’t fight before in a War. That would have never happened if the war had never happened.

# data[].attributes.subject
No, The Continental army would have been trained and experienced enough to fight the British army. The Continental Army would not have had any training or experience fighting because they didn’t fight before in a War. That would have never happened if the war had never happened.

# data[].attributes.body
Anthony

I believe that if the French and Indian war had not occurred the continental Amry. The Continental Amry would not likely fight the British army. Reason one the British were way more powerful than the American Army. Also, the British had a better geographic land than the American Army.

# data[].attributes.body
If the French and Indian War had not occurred the Continental Army would not have had enough experience to fight the British. When the French and Indian war occurred the continental army got experience in fighting in a war, the British were very strong so without that experience they had they couldn't have fought against the British

# data[].attributes.body
The Continental Army would not have been able to fight the British army. The Continental Army Had gained experience from the French and Indian War to help them fight and if they didn’t have the French and Indian war they wouldn’t know how to beat the British army. The Continental Army was fighting as the British Soldiers in the French and Indian war so they know how to fight the British Army.

# data[].attributes.body
Matthew Pagano- No, the Continental Army would not have had enough experience to fight the British army if the French and Indian War had not occurred. One reason is that the Continental Army would have not been in any other war which meant they had no training and no experience fighting in a war. Another reason is that when they fought in the French and Indian War, the Continental Army saw how the British attacked and what battle tactics they used. But if they never fought in the war, the Continental Army wouldn’t know anything about how the British fight. As stated, the Continental Army would not have had enough experience.

# data[].attributes.body
If the French and Indian War did not occur then the Continental Army would not have been prepared to fight the British Army.  If the war didn’t take place the Continental Army wouldn’t be ready to fight and would be taken over since the British Army is much bigger and stronger than them.  The army would not know many strategies and any knowledge about War and fighting.

# data[].attributes.body
If the French and Indian War had not occurred the Continental Army would not have been experienced enough to fight the British Army. The Continental Army wouldn’t have been able to fight the British Army because they got more fighting skills while fighting the French and Indian War and they wouldn’t know better ways to do it if the French and Indian War didn’t happen.

# data[].attributes.body
If the French and Indian War had not occurred, then the Continental Army would have not been experienced enough to fight the British army. The continental army gained experience from the French and Indian War so if it hadn’t occurred, the army would have never been properly trained on how to fight in a war.

# data[].attributes.body
If the French and Indian War had not occurred, the Continental Army would not have been experienced enough to beat the British army. The British army was a very powerful army, the Continental Army needed all the knowledge and experience they could get. If the French and Indian War had never happened the Continental Army would not have been experienced enough to beat the British army.

# data[].attributes.body
The Continental Army would have been experienced enough to fight the British because the British were bigger, stronger and more powerful. The Americans would not have known the British strategies to over power them. The Americans would not have the same ability as the British and therefore not be able to attack in a smarter way or win the war.

# data[].attributes.body
The Continental Army should have gone through the French and Indian War.  It would be a lot more beneficial fighting somebody that is not who the French usually train against.  This would also be another good thing for the French because they could also see how good their weapons are against other people. So they could see what they need to improve on their guns or anything about their own army.  The French would have been benefited by fighting in the French and Indian War.

# data[].attributes.body
If the French and Indian War had not occurred, the Continental Army would not have been experienced enough to fight the British army. The Continental Army would have not had enough skill if they had not fought in the French and Indian War. The Continental Army would not have learned the strategies and skills they had learned in the French and Indian War leaving them knowing less, fighting against the British Army. This would make the Continental Army weaker, making them lose the fight against the British Army.

# data[].attributes.body
The Continental Army would not have been experienced enough to fight the British army.  The British soldiers were a much smaller group than the army.  The Continental Army would not have been ready for the size of the army.  The British army was also more powerful than the soldiers.  The Continental Army would not have been experienced enough to fight the British army.

# data[].attributes.body
If the French and Indian War had not occurred, the Continental Army would not have been experienced enough to fight the British army. The Continental Army probably learned how to survive during a war, and strategies on how to defeat their enemies during the French and Indian War. If that war had not happened, the Continental Army would not be able to survive during the war, and would have not known any battle tactics, making them easier to kill. The Continental Army did not have as mighty and powerful weapons as the British army did, so if they did not have previous training in the French and Indian War, they would not have been able to fight as well as they did in the American Revolution.

# data[].attributes.headline
The Continental Army would not have had enough experience to fight the British if the French and Indian War had not occurred. The army would not have enough experience because they would not know the structure of War and strategies to use to win against Britain. Therefore the Continental army would most likely lose. -Addison Miller.

# data[].attributes.subject
The Continental Army would not have had enough experience to fight the British if the French and Indian War had not occurred. The army would not have enough experience because they would not know the structure of War and strategies to use to win against Britain. Therefore the Continental army would most likely lose. -Addison Miller.

# data[].attributes.body
No, the Continental army would not be experienced enough to fight the British army. The reason was that the Continental army would not have had any training or experience fighting in a War if the French and Indian War had never occured.

# data[].attributes.body
It was unfair for the British government to tax the American colonist's in order to pay for soldiers who were protecting the American Colonies. The American Colonists didn’t have a choice to pay the taxes.  The colonists didn’t have anyone to represent them in the British government and fight for their rights.

# data[].attributes.body
It was not fair for the British Government to tax the American colonists.  The British Government borrowed money and needed money to pay back the money.  The British Government stationed its soldiers in former French forts and that was expensive for the Government.  It was the British Government’s fault that they did that and should have payed it by trading and working instead of using the American colonist’s money.

more_vertical

# data[].attributes.body
It was not fair for the British government to tax the American colonists. One reason this was not fair is that the American colonists were not fighting against the British, and it was the British’s fault for spending a large amount of money on war. Another reason this was not fair was that the British Government did not have any elected representatives. It was not fair for the British government to tax the American colonists so the British could pay their soldiers.

# data[].attributes.body
It was not fair that the British government taxed the American colonists. It was not fair because the American colonists had no elected representatives in the British government. Also, some American colonists could not afford taxes because they were already taxed by their own colony.

# data[].attributes.body
It wasn’t fair for the British government to tax the American colonists to pay the soldiers. It wasn’t fair because the American colonists had never been taxed by the British government before and it wasn’t fair to ambush them like this. Also, since there were no elected representatives in the British government, there was no one to speak on the behalf of the American colonists.

# data[].attributes.body
The British government taxing the colonists was not fair. The colonists were paying taxes with no one in a political position to help them or lower the taxes. The colonists should have a say in what they are paying more money for. The colonists should be able to elect representatives in the British government to have someone saying what the colonists want or feel about taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
The British government was was fair. The British government was fair because the British were taxing in order to pay for soldiers. The soldiers were protecting the American colonies.  The British did not have enough money for the French and Indian war. They needed to borrow the money and were going to pay it back for the French and Indian war. The British paid money for soldiers in order to protect the American colonies. The British government was fair.

# data[].attributes.body
Matthew Pagano- It was fair for the British government to tax the American colonists. The British government was taxing the American colonists so that they could pay for soldiers who would protect the American Colonies. This meant the American Colonies were paying taxes so that they could be protected, so they were not paying taxes for no reason. It was also fair because the American Colonists were living in the American colonies and it shouldn’t be free. As stated, it was fair the British government was taxing the American colonists.

# data[].attributes.body
Anthony - It was fair for the British government to tax the American colonists in order to pay for soldiers who were protecting the American colonies. One reason is that the soldiers were protecting them from anyone that tried to invade the American colonies. Also, they were in dept of money so the British government had to start taxing American colonists.

# data[].attributes.body
It was fair for the British government to tax the American Colonists in order to pay for soldiers who were protecting the American Colonies. Not everything about the American Colonists being taxed was right but the reason makes sense. If the people in the colonies wanted to stay protected then they needed a way to get the soldiers what they needed. The soldiers should have also had some type of payment for what they have been doing to protect the colonies and  the people that were being protected should definitely contribute. It should not be a lot  being taxed but a little bit of money from each person at least seems reasonable depending on how much money they have and make. -Natasha

# data[].attributes.headline
Addison Miller: It was fair that the British had to pay the American taxes because the British owed the Americas because the Americans have lent them money, forts, and land which cost them a lot of money. Also, the British were not just paying taxes for the American soldiers but after the war, British soldiers were also stationed there. So this was only fair because the British is just paying the Americans back for what they gave them.

# data[].attributes.subject
Addison Miller: It was fair that the British had to pay the American taxes because the British owed the Americas because the Americans have lent them money, forts, and land which cost them a lot of money. Also, the British were not just paying taxes for the American soldiers but after the war, British soldiers were also stationed there. So this was only fair because the British is just paying the Americans back for what they gave them.

# data[].attributes.headline
Dominc - It was not fair to the colonist that The British taxed them. The British taxed the American colonist for the pay of Britians soldiers is unfair because the colonist had no way to say no we don’t want to pay these taxes for Britain. It is also unfair to the colonist that they had no colonist representative in the British parliament to state that the colonist did not want to be taxed for the soldiers to be paid. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Dominc - It was not fair to the colonist that The British taxed them. The British taxed the American colonist for the pay of Britians soldiers is unfair because the colonist had no way to say no we don’t want to pay these taxes for Britain. It is also unfair to the colonist that they had no colonist representative in the British parliament to state that the colonist did not want to be taxed for the soldiers to be paid. 

# data[].attributes.body
It was not fair for the British to tax the American Colonists. The British should have gotten their own money by trading and working instead of taxing the American Colonists.  The British should have known how much money they were going to spend.  And based on what number they get based on how everything is going to cost that would make the choice if could they afford to get into the French and Indian war, or can’t afford to go into the French and Indian.  The British taxing the Colonists was wrong and it was something that the British should have thought about doing.

# data[].attributes.body
It was unfair to tax the American colonists. The American colonists did not have a say in what the British government was doing, nor did they have any elected representatives that could disagree with taxing the colonists. This was unfair because there was nothing and nobody that could stop the British government from taxing the American colonists.

# data[].attributes.body
It was not fair for the British government to tax the American colonists in order to pay for soldiers who were protecting the American Colonies. Even though the soldiers were protecting the colonies, they shouldn’t have taxed the American colonists to pay for British soldiers, they should have taxed the citizens living in Britain. It wouldn’t be fair for the British Parliament to tax people who don’t have a representative in the government. That is called taxation without representation, and is definitely not fair.

# data[].attributes.headline
Noah - The taxes were fair because the British government needed money to give the soldiers for protecting the American Colonies, and they needed to get more money because the government bought a lot of lands and they needed to make the money back.

# data[].attributes.subject
Noah - The taxes were fair because the British government needed money to give the soldiers for protecting the American Colonies, and they needed to get more money because the government bought a lot of lands and they needed to make the money back.

# data[].attributes.headline
Alana Prenner: It was not fair for the British government to tax the American colonists because the colonists were being imposed by a government in which colonists had no say. The war had not benefited the colonies as much as it had benefited England. The American colonists felt they should not pay the taxes because they were passed in England’s parliament. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Alana Prenner: It was not fair for the British government to tax the American colonists because the colonists were being imposed by a government in which colonists had no say. The war had not benefited the colonies as much as it had benefited England. The American colonists felt they should not pay the taxes because they were passed in England’s parliament. 

# data[].attributes.body
After the French and Indian War, the British had to tax the American colonists to regain the money that was spent from stationing British soldiers to protect the American colonies. The colonists thought that it was completely unfair for them, and the Colonists had a right to be upset, but it was mostly fair for the British to be taxing them. One example is the British had been protecting them, the taxes would have been exchange for their protection.