# data[].attributes.body
Demoted the ones that contained 2 elements to the bottom of the list as they would be lower probabilities. Then tried to put them in order of what would be relevant

# data[].attributes.headline
As soon as I read the statements, I categorised them quickly based on a formula: outspoken + philosophy = some sort of activism. My life experiences and context help me to organise those statements. I start to think that my experiences and life have helped to build a frame of biases and assumptions, which is scary to realise.

# data[].attributes.subject
As soon as I read the statements, I categorised them quickly based on a formula: outspoken + philosophy = some sort of activism. My life experiences and context help me to organise those statements. I start to think that my experiences and life have helped to build a frame of biases and assumptions, which is scary to realise.

# data[].attributes.body
I have completely based my response on the level of activism, social justice and area of study. A feminist I would assume is easier to predict than her actual job profession. If she was strong enough in opinion to go to rallies, working at a bank may conflict with views against capitalism, which is emphasised as an issue pretty heavily in social science degrees, trough the course content and the shared perspectives of the lecturers. She has identified credentials in psychology, an interest in social issues hence social work, and teaching influences the next generation for change. I am expecting to be told I was wrong, but this would be my honest assumption.

# data[].attributes.body
I answered this question with 2 thoughts in mind - don't be biased by 'assumptions' of character and beware of probabilities outside the story. Hence I started with single statement and fiished with dual statements

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
That's what I think Linda would be, taking into consideration the probabilities, I also left whatever was double assumptions for last. I think my 3 should be 2.