# data[].attributes.headline
Hi, may I know where can I find past year paper for this subject? I couldn't find it in the link provided in the moodle outline

# data[].attributes.subject
Hi, may I know where can I find past year paper for this subject? I couldn't find it in the link provided in the moodle outline

# data[].attributes.headline
Would you like us to put the references in-text next to the information we used it for, or just in the references at the end?

# data[].attributes.subject
Would you like us to put the references in-text next to the information we used it for, or just in the references at the end?

# data[].attributes.headline
Do you want us to submit team contract and evaluation form in the cover sheet or just the meeting minutes?

# data[].attributes.subject
Do you want us to submit team contract and evaluation form in the cover sheet or just the meeting minutes?

# data[].attributes.body
In the marking rubric, we are asked to research regulation and competition issues in the UK market, is this referring to the argument we have to make about the relevance of the Invisible hand in regulating MNEs today, or is this another topic we have to address?
Thank you

# data[].attributes.body
Where can we find data for market share ect for the concentration ratio..I cannot find any legitimate sites
Thank you

# data[].attributes.headline
For the 2nd part of the question, where we are we arguing whether we think the invisible hand is still relevant in regulating the MNE's. Are we using empirical data/reports to come to our own conclusion of whether we think they are self regulating (i.e., the invisible hand is working) or should it be more theoretical and theory based? In other words is there a right or wrong answer or is it based off our interpretation as long as it has evidence to back it up. Thank-you

# data[].attributes.subject
For the 2nd part of the question, where we are we arguing whether we think the invisible hand is still relevant in regulating the MNE's. Are we using empirical data/reports to come to our own conclusion of whether we think they are self regulating (i.e., the invisible hand is working) or should it be more theoretical and theory based? In other words is there a right or wrong answer or is it based off our interpretation as long as it has evidence to back it up. Thank-you

# data[].attributes.headline
Would you be able to upload the recording for the lecture on the group project from 31/03. No worries if it was not recorded

# data[].attributes.subject
Would you be able to upload the recording for the lecture on the group project from 31/03. No worries if it was not recorded

# data[].attributes.body
Just wondering if it would be possible for you to provide some previous examples of successful presentations. So we have some more guidance on how to deliver to a high standard.

# data[].attributes.body
For the impact portion of the project where the rubric emphasized on discussing the impacts. Are we suppose to take sides or take a stance? For example we’re suppose to discuss pros of apple coming to the UK and cons? Or are we recommended to discuss one side and emphasize upon it.

# data[].attributes.body
In the grading rubric and brief we’re recommended to sourcd multiple data sources. I would like to ask where do you recommend us to find quality data sources?

# data[].attributes.body
I would like to ask if lecture 6 and 7 is the final resources we're given for the group project?

# data[].attributes.body
Under presentation and submission guideline, on step 5, its unclear for me.

Say for example my group were to record a regular video with our upper body showing our face and using narrations from that video. If we were to place it on a corner of the slide presentation within the video is that alright? because we have never used PowerPoint voice-over or PowerPoint files with embedded audio before.

# data[].attributes.headline
is the 2023 version of the textbook better reading material (as it includes more recent e.g. Brexit perspectives)

# data[].attributes.subject
is the 2023 version of the textbook better reading material (as it includes more recent e.g. Brexit perspectives)