# data[].attributes.body
Nifty Fox

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Compass Plus Impact Forum Summary Newsletter lo

# data[].attributes.headline
How we are capturing information from the event: graphic facilitation and rapporteurs

# data[].attributes.subject
How we are capturing information from the event: graphic facilitation and rapporteurs

# data[].attributes.body
In addition to the skills of Laura and Chris in capturing images of the event we will also have a team of 5 rapportuers who will be taking notes during the sessions and using these to produce a summary.
Rachael Kirwan will be taking photographs of the outputs and activities and posting them onto the Padlet so that throughout the day you will be able to see the materials generated.

# data[].attributes.headline
Rebooting Global International Society Change, Contestation, and Resilience 

# data[].attributes.subject
Rebooting Global International Society Change, Contestation, and Resilience 

# data[].attributes.body
Trine Flockhart discussing the interlocking of the concepts. How are they changed ? Are they resilient?

# data[].attributes.body
Cornelia Navari (university of Birmingham) shares thoughts about the chapters including motivations : principles, practise and power. Is contestation community reinforcing? Legitimacy gaps - norms cycle theory ? And should we look for a common culture at all?

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.menti.com/alzovvcrqpkb

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Your browser either doesn't support Javascript, or you've turned it off. To vote with Mentimeter, please make sure to turn Javascript on. How do I enable Javascript?

Click the button to participate!

# data[].attributes.headline
Nifty fox digital scribing - key note session 

# data[].attributes.subject
Nifty fox digital scribing - key note session 

# data[].attributes.body
This was created live by the phenomenally talented Chris who is a designer from Nifty Fox creative.

# data[].attributes.body
You can find every illustration created today at the following link:

https://niftyfoxcreative.pixieset.com/gcrfcompassresearchimpactforum/

# data[].attributes.body
GCRF project Compass + welcome to all our invited experts

# data[].attributes.body
Key note addressing resilience. Consequences of the world's saturation is the main driver of the problems that we are, and will face in the future decades. 9 limits that we should not cross. Arthur suggests that we have already crossed 6 of these to date.

# data[].attributes.headline
The age of big questions the age of poly-crisis 

# data[].attributes.subject
The age of big questions the age of poly-crisis 

# data[].attributes.body
Trine Flockhart asks the question of the dealing with the crisis individually and how they relate collectively. The change process can offer improvements but this can accelerate the impact on us and not always at a positive local level. Such as technology improvements that untimely cause the loss of jobs. What is most important local, regional and wider?

# data[].attributes.headline
Trine - resilience adaptation to stay fit for purpose 

# data[].attributes.subject
Trine - resilience adaptation to stay fit for purpose 

# data[].attributes.body
Not just bouncing back after a crisis. It we just bounce back then we are not moving forwards. The good life is the values and visions that a society has at it s core. The ordering domain is held together by ‘the good life’. Adjustments and reflections are necessary to move us forwards. The good life won’t really change. There needs to be a cooperation and discovery of areas of diversity that you can agree on. Differences will be accelerated with the poly crisis and we need the institutional frameworks to recognise this and accept the challenges we are facing in order to build resilience as diversity governance.

# data[].attributes.body
Awesome interactive cafe discussions was introduced)

# data[].attributes.body
Thanks, dear Elena for gathering all together!

# data[].attributes.body
Over the past two decades, the concepts of community resilience and local ownership have proliferated in policy-making. However, the way these concepts have been applied in practice and in policy programmes is widely criticised by the scholarly community for rigid thinking and premeditated solutions (Joseph 2013; Petrova and Delcour 2019; Korosteleva and Flockhart 2019). These roundtable discussions aims to explore the potential of the concept ‘community resilience’ as a new ‘ways of being, knowing, and doing’ (Escobar 2018:19), which is situational, context-specific, local, relational, and emergent. By referencing research findings from Central Eurasia, the roundtable aims to identify what makes communities resilient, i.e. unpack local identities, philosophies, perceptions of the good life, local resources and support infrastructures, and social capital more broadly. What motivates people to stay resilient in times of crisis, war, adversity; and how the international community can support them.

1. What makes communities resilient?
2. What do communities need to nurture resilience?
3. How has thinking about resilience changed over time?

# data[].attributes.headline
How can communities achieve ontological security and sense of a good life through resilience?

# data[].attributes.subject
How can communities achieve ontological security and sense of a good life through resilience?

# data[].attributes.body
The conversations are starting ……..

# data[].attributes.body
Lively discussions addressing the second question ; horizontal links and grass roots activities. How can they be supported and sustained in circumstances of repression, war and other forms of crises.

# data[].attributes.body
What are the mechanisms? And what is the theoretical concept?

# data[].attributes.body
Resilience being approached from a bottom up approach. Identity as a sense of belonging. How is it driven ? Culture, language, beliefs? Understanding the why ? One size can’t fit all. Sense of exclusion can be a source of negativity and unrest. The first duty of a government to protect their community. If they don’t - can we say they have failed? Can we say we have one solution ? There are multiple economic interests.

# data[].attributes.body
How can we measure this? What are the metrics? Assessment of communities and facilitation of support to communities. Societies expressing their needs and participatory engagement. What happens if there is conflict within this? Dialogues and conflicts are normal, it is the way that they are resolved. How shall we address this conflict ? Frameworks for policy to make them more efficient. Dialogues are Powerful tools which can be used to help learn from other experiences; Looking internationally and spheres of influence. Build from previous learnings. But what are the actions following from this? What if huge contradictions are discovered? It might help understanding but not necessarily able to adopt.

# data[].attributes.headline
Colloque Two: Exploring Regional Challenges

# data[].attributes.subject
Colloque Two: Exploring Regional Challenges

# data[].attributes.body
‘Community’ is precisely ‘where ordering takes place’ and where change is constituted in the pursuit of set goals, whereby power is manifested in a specific social identity, in principles which specify the norms and rules that define appropriate behaviour and social sanctions, and in practices which could be habitual and/or reflexive to ‘bring about transformation and renewal’. In a complex life, if change were to affect one element of the ordering domain, it would necessitate adaptation in the other two, to remain ‘fit for purpose’ and responsive to a constantly changing environment. Central to a responsive ordering domain - a community of relations - is resilience as a governing modality and a foundational principle of the local, enabling a complex system to self-organise in the most adaptive ways in response to change. These communities, drawing on common traditions, philosophy, intergenerational knowledge, and aspirations for the good life, may exceed state borders and develop intra- and inter-regional dynamics (e.g. CA)  around common challenges, or fight against injustice (e.g. Ukraine, Belarus & Georgia conjointly but not as a state)

Are there any best practice examples to share about nurturing resilience on a regional level? Can resilience be seen as ‘borderless’?

Is there any evidence to show how regions can overcome adversity and crisis through resilience on a regional scale?

How can our understanding of local communities in the region help to nurture resilience upwards - from the local to the global?

# data[].attributes.body
"Does it make sense to study resilience on the regional level?"

“In what ways more resilient regional orders lead to a more sustainable global environment?”

# data[].attributes.headline
Colloque 2 regional challenges to sustainable growth and how to tackle them through resilience - building in central Eurasia. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Colloque 2 regional challenges to sustainable growth and how to tackle them through resilience - building in central Eurasia. 

# data[].attributes.headline
What does resilience look like on a regional level? 

# data[].attributes.subject
What does resilience look like on a regional level? 

# data[].attributes.body
Divisions and revivals. Shared values - creating this concept and bringing it into existence. Regional level occupies this middle ground between global and international possibly forming a ‘bridge’. Practically regions can have divides which are in place physically. Close proximity, shared values with neighbouring countries. if your neighbour us peaceful and stable then you will feel peaceful and stable. This will make the country more attractive to the outside world and have more positive impacts that are further reaching. Looking at certain areas the Regional conflicts puts increased stresses on the boarders which is not unique. Pressures on water seems to be most felt in Central Asia. How do we understand resilient communities and can this be transferred to the regional resilience? Regional connectivity and collaborations rather than competition. Integrating learnings from the local level and adapting to suit the needs of the region. Not just copying but adjusting to be fit for the regional purpose.

# data[].attributes.headline
Best practise and complexity in your regions. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Best practise and complexity in your regions. 

# data[].attributes.body
Capturing the similarities and differences.

# data[].attributes.body
Exploring the emergence of resilience in communities to help capacity building and unity.

# data[].attributes.body
Resilience vs sustainability

# data[].attributes.body
Communities and informal networks supporting each other when the state can’t, won’t or are unable to.

# data[].attributes.body
What is the role of global actors ?

# data[].attributes.body
How can we deal with the state? Change of leadership/narrative to promote a commonality. Has the invasion encouraged cooperation? Maybe in some situations. Empathy and how do you build this into the society and in policy making? If we have different historical memories and experiences how we can empathise? Globalisation was thought to be wonderful for some and problematic for others. Who gets the benefit? Who bears the impact? Regional trading blocks that dominate and power blocks with trade wars. Regional cooperation can support global cooperation.

# data[].attributes.body
From your research/experience, what does it mean to be ‘resilient’ on a global level

Does 'fit-for-purpose' mean to be 'resilient'?

What needs to change for global structures to be responsive to change, and 'fit-for-purpose'?

What can we learn from resilience as 'analytic of governance' (or governance of uncertainty)?

# data[].attributes.body
How to ensure a learning loop between resilience as self-governance, and resilience as diversity-governance?

How can we nurture the responsive environment of learning premised on the bottom-up and horizontal systems' response?

# data[].attributes.body
How can we support resilience as self- and diversity-governance in the context of scarcity and precarity?

What kind of behavioural change is needed to accept the primacy of 'community of relations’ as a foundation for a more sustainable and complex global life?

What kind of new structures, including on the global level, are needed to support it?

# data[].attributes.body
Rethinking international support and global governance in a pluriversal world: how to make it more resilient and fit-for-purpose?

# data[].attributes.body
Local - Dealing with and coping with uncertainty. How can we survive and transform and be in control?
Regional - can we come together and be stronger toegther?
Global - resilience on the global level. A Concept that should help us
1 helps to give more attention at the local level. If we don’t capture at the local level then it can’t be captured globally. But what is local?
2 resilience helps us notion of resilience. Not just regaining the same shape, but discovering what is in a and around us. Withstanding the challenges and tackle them coherently.
3 if we now realise the challenges with tall the uncertainties how do we react to change? Can I live with uncertainty ? What needs to change within myself to cope? Behavioural changes to support our resilience. Resilience within and between the orders? How do we govern? What does this mean globally?

# data[].attributes.body
Question of being fit for purpose - should we be judging on their level? Irrational is not necessarily the opposite of ration. It’s All too human! If there was an emergency would we be making judgment calls ?
at a global level is resilience separate from the institution? It is argued that these are inescapable. Bringing two communities together with their own agendas and by the institution which also has it s own agenda.
Discussions show that there resilience is wholistic.  When resilience is discussed with different meanings - uncertainty, challenges and threats.  What are the main global uncertainties, challenges and threats? Governance plays a part in this. How should governance be recognised and what part should it play. Global community doesn’t seem to be apparent. Participation in global resilience needs to stem from a togetherness and community.  Without this it is impossible to get a sense of global resilience. Quantum regulations and creation of interdependence to promote a feeling of global society. Community at global level. Between the local regional and global residence are so closely linked. Revision and rethinking of the future of governance and interconnections making a new view of the world!
Reconcile diversity of Resilient orders suggests that they should be or are built into the global scale.

# data[].attributes.body
Connecting the within with the between. Goal of resilience as a self governance. Where does it leave the challenges and how will they transform and will they be addressed? Will the fundamental question of climate change be very different in 10 years compared to now? Universalism in international realism. Does it exist ? And does the global impact on the individual ? Which is the most important ?

# data[].attributes.body
What should we take away and what should we share and present to the policy makers?

# data[].attributes.body
Communities link between the local and recognition of this.
Regional and global institutions once you start mentioning and directing.  Identifying areas of commonality. What is possible?
Case studies on good examples of resilience on all three levels. Examples of reactions uncertainty, challenge and threat. Develop to pro activity rather than just reacting. New models of narratives which shows what real life cases do we have.
possibility of universalism. It is not just about disagreement. Beauty that you see in me is your reflection. Unification of us - diversity. Readiness for risk. Remind each other of humanity and human relations.

# data[].attributes.headline
Beauty you see in me is reflection of you. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Beauty you see in me is reflection of you. 

# data[].attributes.body
1. Why are neoliberal interpretations of resilience flawed?

2. Are there alternatives we could explore?

3. What was emerging from these conversations that might direct future policy or research initiatives?