# data[].attributes.body
Proposal lacks relevance and originality. Research questions are missing or inappropriate.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal shows limited relevance or originality. Research questions are unclear or poorly developed.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal demonstrates adequate relevance and some originality. Research questions are present but could be more clearly defined.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal shows clear relevance and originality. Research questions are well-defined with good potential for contribution to the field.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal fails to address social justice implications or shows misunderstanding of equity issues.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal shows limited connection to social justice outcomes. Superficial understanding of equity issues.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal shows moderate potential for social justice impact. Basic understanding of equity issues with some implementation ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal demonstrates good potential for social justice impact. Shows clear understanding of equity issues with viable implementation strategies.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal clearly articulates significant potential impact on social justice issues. Shows deep understanding of equity, inclusion, and systemic change. Includes concrete strategies for implementation.

# data[].attributes.body
Methodology is missing or severely flawed. No clear timeline or resource consideration.

# data[].attributes.body
Methodology is vague or inappropriate. Timeline and resources are unclear or unrealistic.

# data[].attributes.body
Methodology is present but needs more detail. Timeline and resources are mentioned but need more clarity.

# data[].attributes.body
Methodology is well-planned and mostly appropriate. Timeline and resources are adequately outlined with good feasibility.

# data[].attributes.body
Methodology is thoroughly detailed, appropriate, and realistic. Timeline and resources are clearly outlined and feasible. Strong alignment between goals and methods.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal is poorly written and disorganized. Numerous errors that severely impact comprehension.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal has significant writing or organizational issues. Multiple errors that impact understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal is adequately written with some organizational issues. Contains some errors but maintains basic clarity.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal is well-written and organized with minimal errors. Ideas are presented clearly with good academic writing style.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal is exceptionally well-written, logically organized, and free of errors. Ideas flow seamlessly with professional academic writing style.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal lacks clear thematic connection. Would not fit well within any panel grouping.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal has weak thematic alignment. Difficult to place within panel groupings.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal shows adequate thematic connection. Could potentially fit into panel groupings with some adjustment.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal demonstrates good thematic alignment and panel potential. Topic would fit well within probable panel groupings.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal shows exceptional potential for thematic grouping. Topic aligns perfectly with likely panel themes and would contribute significantly to scholarly discourse.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposal demonstrates exceptional originality and relevance to scholarship and social justice. Research questions are clearly articulated and innovative. Shows strong potential for meaningful contribution to the field.