# data[].attributes.headline
Could we allow Progress 1 submission be within a window, i.e. Feb-16 to Mar-01, so campuses that are ready to submit, with their progress data, submit earlier so we could expand our review window time?

# data[].attributes.subject
Could we allow Progress 1 submission be within a window, i.e. Feb-16 to Mar-01, so campuses that are ready to submit, with their progress data, submit earlier so we could expand our review window time?

# data[].attributes.body
Curious how many districts will be questioning their ACCT status in the fall and if that will take up time or if ACCT will have last minute changes?

# data[].attributes.headline
It looks like we could get more campus visits in between the touchpoint windows.  Are campus visits going to be encouraged, is there funding, will there be a certain number of campuses to visit?

# data[].attributes.subject
It looks like we could get more campus visits in between the touchpoint windows.  Are campus visits going to be encouraged, is there funding, will there be a certain number of campuses to visit?

# data[].attributes.body
When the ESC does the training at BOY, would it be possible to attend the ESC training, this could serve as the DCSI touchpoint.

# data[].attributes.body
Alot of confusion with new campuses at the beginning of the year and ESCs will have to support more than us.

# data[].attributes.body
Positive: dropping one touch point; emphasis on campus visits; addresses later STAAR results

# data[].attributes.body
How will this effect training? Training often occurs in the summer, especially foundational training. With last BOY, would this force campuses to begin initial training after the year has started? How will this effect capacity, etc.? Would this challenge the quality and pacing of training? Rural campuses even more so.

# data[].attributes.body
What would be the focus of the first campus visits since it will before the BOY? Will this not be an implementation visit?

# data[].attributes.body
Will we need to rely on partnerships ESCs and VIPs for implementation since there are not as many touchpoints?

# data[].attributes.body
There could be some district calendar challenges with holidays and breaks that the new touchpoints currently are during some of these times.

# data[].attributes.headline
Will Pathway 1's continue with ESCs?  As I review my applications, the majority of my load are Pathway 1's.

# data[].attributes.subject
Will Pathway 1's continue with ESCs?  As I review my applications, the majority of my load are Pathway 1's.

# data[].attributes.body
For campus visits, with campuses visited before BOY, will they still receive a 2nd call since they didn't receive feedback?

# data[].attributes.body
Will the priority of campuses and criteria of qualifying a visit change since it is before BOY?

# data[].attributes.headline
If ESF FSG campuses definition is defined before the 2023 Accountability numbers are released, could we have a submission window for these campuses earlier, so we can release review time for all other campuses? 

# data[].attributes.subject
If ESF FSG campuses definition is defined before the 2023 Accountability numbers are released, could we have a submission window for these campuses earlier, so we can release review time for all other campuses? 

# data[].attributes.body
With the focus on 4.1, will the later implementation date challenge implementation of HQIM and RBIS since it is a robust EA which requires an entire year for fully implementation of an Annual Outcome?

# data[].attributes.headline
Board Approval date of TIP is kind of late, could we move it up earlier?

# data[].attributes.subject
Board Approval date of TIP is kind of late, could we move it up earlier?

# data[].attributes.body
Will there be a 2nd timeline for campuses already in SI since they have been working on it during the summer, the new timeline might not account for this and instead address only new campuses to SI?

# data[].attributes.body
Should there be a process of consistent criteria and rationale for campus visits, especially when a TIP will not be in place for 1st visits?

# data[].attributes.body
As we work at finalizing our work we need to keep in mind the impact our work will have on the ESC staff

# data[].attributes.body
With fewer touchpoints, potentially more evaluative campus visits, and fewer conversations to understand context, this could pose a challenge to building relationships and buy-in between TEA and districts/ESCs.

# data[].attributes.headline
We are going to have revamp resources (TIP, TIP Rubric, 806 platform, etc. to adjust for fewer cycles)

# data[].attributes.subject
We are going to have revamp resources (TIP, TIP Rubric, 806 platform, etc. to adjust for fewer cycles)

# data[].attributes.body
Extending the window more if workload numbers are significantly different.

# data[].attributes.headline
I understand that the ESCs can't get into Qualtrics, but can they score PW1s on the rubric for us to enter into Qual?

# data[].attributes.subject
I understand that the ESCs can't get into Qualtrics, but can they score PW1s on the rubric for us to enter into Qual?