# data[].attributes.body
Revisit the Criteria for various disciplines - for exampled in MYP science there is not an obvious category to assess a students ability to communicate

# data[].attributes.headline
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
How would you enhance the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What do you like about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is difficult/challenging about the current version?

# data[].attributes.headline
Evaluation report: A study of the implementation and impact of the MYP: Next chapter (2020)

# data[].attributes.subject
Evaluation report: A study of the implementation and impact of the MYP: Next chapter (2020)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Tarek Azzam, Megan Mansfield and Devin Larsen-Claremont Evaluation Center

In 2013, the International Baccalaureate (IB) launched the MYP: Next chapter, which was intended to enhance the Middle Years Programme (MYP), making it "better for students, easier for teachers, and more flexible for schools". This report summarizes findings from the final phase of a longitudinal study that examined schools' implementation of MYP: Next chapter strategies. The evaluation report combines qualitative case study visits, quantitative performance monitoring framework (PMF) teacher and student surveys, and eAssessment data to report on student outcomes. Findings suggest that most schools appear to be implementing MYP: Next chapter in a way that meets IB expectations. The study indicates that high levels of MYP implementation are associated with better non-academic outcomes, such as active community membership and international-mindedness. Teachers valued programme strategies like concept-based learning, Global Contexts and Approaches to Learning, and these strategies also seemed to have notable effects on student non-academic outcomes. There was not enough evidence to determine if implementation strengths led to a change in students' academic performance, as measured by eAssessment data. To learn more about this study's results, the retrospective executive summary presents collective findings from across the multi-year evaluation of MYP: Next chapter.
Evaluation report executive summary (PDF, 405 KB) Evaluation report (PDF, 2.8 MB) Retrospective executive summary (PDF, 823 KB)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Evaluation report: A study of the implementation and impact of the MYP: Next chapter (2020)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Tarek Azzam, Megan Mansfield and Devin Larsen-Claremont Evaluation Center