# data[].attributes.headline
the start (griswold vs connecticut) 1879

# data[].attributes.subject
the start (griswold vs connecticut) 1879

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/496 two people opened an abortion clinic and were arrested for violating the anti abortion laws of the time.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1970/84 the district of columbia had an abortion statue that was challenged for being unconstitutionally vague.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1971/70-17  baird was arrested for  providing contraceptives to unmarried women. at the time of this case only licensed doctors could prescribe contraceptives only to married women.

# data[].attributes.body
the case was made that the abortion laws violated the constitutional right to privacy.  https://www.oyez.org/cases/1971/70-18

# data[].attributes.body
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/179/
a woman was denied an abortion for failure to meet any of the requirements specified by georgia law.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/194/bigelow-v-virginia
a man who ran an abortion clinic in new york was convicted in virginia for printing abortion advertisements. the argument was made that the advertising fell under the protection of the first amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellotti_v._Baird_(1979)
this case was about whether or not minors could obtain an abortion without parental consent. the decision was made not to extend this right to minors. this was done on the emphasis that they lack critical thinking skills.

# data[].attributes.body
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/448/297/
this case was started with the hyde amendment which prevented medicaid funds being used for abortions.

# data[].attributes.headline
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health 1983

# data[].attributes.subject
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health 1983

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1982/81-746 the case was whether or not the akron ordinance violated the women's reproductive rights granted in roe vs wade.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.american.edu/cas/news/roe-v-wade-overturned-what-it-means-whats-next.cfm
the roe vs wade decison was over turned by the supreme court on the basis of protecting the potentiality of human life.

# data[].attributes.body
the turning point of the timeline was roe vs wade overturned because out of nowhere the supreme court decided to undo years of civil rights work.