# data[].attributes.body
More advantages.

# data[].attributes.headline
4. Patients whose family has been pushed into poverty by costly cancer treatments walk away with hope for the future. But I will still judge he is illegal, maybe a light sentence. As I can't promote this atmosphere in the society of making smuggling medicine

# data[].attributes.subject
4. Patients whose family has been pushed into poverty by costly cancer treatments walk away with hope for the future. But I will still judge he is illegal, maybe a light sentence. As I can't promote this atmosphere in the society of making smuggling medicine

# data[].attributes.body
(chan man kwan, kaka
19633793)

# data[].attributes.body
Q4I think there's still a legal decision to be made. Even in legal decisions morality is an important factor, but this is not a reason to pardon everything. But at the same time, because he was saving lives, he was able to get lighter sentences, and he was able to fight for certain changes in the new law, and that's what happened.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q4:If you were a judge, what kind of ruling would you give Cheng Yong? How should society balance law and morality?

# data[].attributes.subject
Q4:If you were a judge, what kind of ruling would you give Cheng Yong? How should society balance law and morality?

# data[].attributes.body
Q4.Maybe just Social Service Order,because he has help a lot of low class people to maintain their life.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q3.more advantageous, because it could protect the right of the patient. However, the setting of law should balance the rich and poor people. Don't  tend to rich guys. Otherwise it's meaningless.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q3.more advantageous, because it could protect the right of the patient. However, the setting of law should balance the rich and poor people. Don't  tend to rich guys. Otherwise it's meaningless.

# data[].attributes.body
(Chan Man Kwan, Kaka 19633793)

# data[].attributes.body
Q1:
From a utilitarian perspective, imitation/smuggling of medicine is acceptable if the result of the behavior can achieve the goal of saving people. Successfully saving people will bring good results to rescuers, to the people being saved, and to the society.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantage more than disadvantages. This can help lower class people

# data[].attributes.body
Q3.The advantages must more,because the lower class people can buy the medicine in their affordable price.

# data[].attributes.body
Q3.At the moment, there are many flaws. Although drug companies invest a lot of energy and money in drug development, which keeps their prices high, the protection policy protects their legitimate rights and interests, preventing people from pirating and harming the company. But this would upset the market balance of medicines, which the poor could not afford, while the rich had a better chance of survival.

# data[].attributes.headline
2. Government and Hospital Authority (醫院管理局) should control the reasonable price or the government can provide an allowance for the people who can't afford medical prices.Otherwise, the "black heart" businessman may set a super high price and people may die if they don't have $$$ :(

# data[].attributes.subject
2. Government and Hospital Authority (醫院管理局) should control the reasonable price or the government can provide an allowance for the people who can't afford medical prices.Otherwise, the "black heart" businessman may set a super high price and people may die if they don't have $$$ :(

# data[].attributes.body
(chan man Kwan, kaka
19633793)

# data[].attributes.body
I think this is acceptable when the patient is in danger. It is not possible to force the poor to pay an expensive price for the medicine. However, government should pay more attention to monitor this system. Otherwise, the abuse of resources will occurred.

# data[].attributes.body
Q2.No,free economic market is difficult to control,people can make their own choice.

# data[].attributes.body
Q2.I think the government should do it. First, the government can talk to the drug companies about not setting prices too high, and if necessary, the government can pay to fill the gap in drug development by the drug companies, and the money will of course be collected from the tax. In this way, the rights of corporations are not infringed upon, but the interests of the poor can be protected legally.

# data[].attributes.body
Q2.I think both of them should be entitled to make a country's medical pricing policy. The country's medical pricing policy should not lean to one side because it do not good for anyone.

Q3. Yes. I think it can encourage the drug company produce more drug for public cause they can earn money on it.

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe it is the government. At the same time, the government need to do some researches to get the true reactions of patients. Also, the government can cooperate with the social group by which it can get the latest news and useful suggestions.

# data[].attributes.body
Who do you think should be entitled to make a country's medical pricing policy?

Patient? Government? Or other social groups?

Why? What are the consequences of doing this?

# data[].attributes.body
Q1 ：Smuggling of drugs may give poor people a chance to get treatment, but on the other hand, it also means that they need to bear the risk of drugs, because it is difficult to know the ingredients and source of these drugs, so if the patient takes it, it is difficult to hold accountable

Q3:  Yes, because researchers devote a lot of time and energy to research new drugs,this is their achievement, because researching new drugs requires a long time and money investment

# data[].attributes.body
Q1. Yes I agree, saving a human life is more important. not all of us are able to afford such expensive medicine to get treated.

Q2. I believe the government should place a pricing policy for medicine. Because they have the resourses to know what everyone's average income is. And have the power  to make it affordable to everyone in the country.

Q3. From medical point of view, the patent protection law stops medical centre from overproducing a type of medicine. However, it brings disadvantages for consumers, because the supply is low and price tends to increase.

# data[].attributes.body
Q1：Imitation/smuggling of medicine motivated by saving people is acceptable.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? why?

# data[].attributes.body
I agree cause it can save more people’s life.

# data[].attributes.body
1)In my point of view , yes if the people can use a lower price , and it can save lot of people , because not of all us can afford the money .

2) I think the government should make the lead .

3) I think it is a advantage , it can protect the people who had explore it .

# data[].attributes.body
Q1: To a large extent I agree that imitation/smuggling of medicine is acceptable as patients living in poverty could hardly afford the expensive price of licensed medicine. Without the help of imitation/smuggling of medicine, these poor patients would simply give up and refuse to get cured in order to avoid the burden. However, I could not 100% agree with it since imitation/smuggling of medicine has lots of potential risks. Though its price is relatively cheap and affordable, it might not be as effective as the licensed one. It is also possible for these medicines to have serious side effects.

Q2: I believe that the government or Hospital Authority should be entitled in this case. They are able to use resources wisely in an effective way.

Q3: In my point of view, the patent protective law brings more advantages than disadvantages. The law could motivate medical factories to create new drugs since they can earn money by inventing new medicine. This shows that the patent protective law facilitates the development of medicine, which allows more curing method to be invented.

Q4: I would still sentence him to prison as it is the fact that he had broken the law. If the judge let him go, the law would lose its credibility and medical factories would lose its motivation of inventing new drugs as well. It could be one of the factors that hinders the development of medicine.

# data[].attributes.body
Q1.On the moral level, I think saving lives is the first thing, but on the legal level, it does violate the rights of legitimate drug companies, and it's not entirely just.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, if the medicine is work, and able to save people life, patients can afford these medicines and being saved

# data[].attributes.body
Yes. If there are enough examinations which prove the effectiveness of the smuggling of medicine, it can be accepted.

# data[].attributes.body
Q1: I agree smuggling medicine can save more people, because the interests of the majority are more important than those of the minority.

Q2:
I think the Government should be entitled to make a country's medical pricing policy because this is their responsibility, The Corrupt Government has to change the unfair situation of the underprivileged.Therefore, they have to contribute and consider the life of human beings.

Q3.Undoubtedly, the patent protection law has more advantages than disadvantages. It's because the protection law can supervision and control medical malpractice. Also, enhancing the medical quality and helping the  underprivileged.

Q4. I just need him to compensate for a reasonable amount if i were a judge. Because the judge require to adjust the social norms, even he save a lot of people.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. yes. If the medicine could provide a cheaper price and save more people. Why not ? In my cognitive, proprietary medicines is very expensive not many people can afford it.

# data[].attributes.subject
1. yes. If the medicine could provide a cheaper price and save more people. Why not ? In my cognitive, proprietary medicines is very expensive not many people can afford it.

# data[].attributes.body
(chan man kwan, kaka 19633793)

# data[].attributes.body
Q1.I’m agree ,because it still can save people life.